My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/26/2004 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2004
>
04/26/2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2014 10:07:42 AM
Creation date
2/28/2014 11:30:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/26/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Lake Drive/I -35W Interchange Study <br />April 26, 2004 <br />and construction staging concepts for the bridge as well as investigating options to <br />widen the existing bridge versus all new construction. Cost estimates would also be <br />provided for the proposed improvements. SEH is proposing to perform these services <br />at a cost not to exceed $22,500. <br />Generally, the improvement of the interchange in its entirety would serve the broader <br />public good and stimulate economic development efforts in the Town Center area both <br />north and south of I -35W. Due to the limited availability of county, state and federal <br />dollars for transportation improvements, and that the Lake Drive /I -35W interchange, has <br />not scored well, historically, in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) <br />process, it is extremely important to try and maximize opportunities when possible. <br />Given that Lake Drive improvements are necessary to facilitate the Legacy at Woods <br />Edge and YMCA projects, it is staffs opinion that any possibilities to incorporate the <br />improvements into a more comprehensive plan should be explored. <br />Staff has submitted a request to Anoka County for cost participation. While they have <br />not had the opportunity to formally respond, it is likely that they will provide, at a <br />minimum, some credit towards future project development. <br />Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04 -49. <br />e <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Resolution No. 04 -49 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.