My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/05/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
04/05/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2014 11:10:59 AM
Creation date
3/24/2014 11:01:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • After discussion, it was agreed that the number of accessory buildings allowed is <br />to remain the same. <br />• <br />• <br />The changes made were minimal, condensing the smaller properties into one category <br />(Less than 1.25 acres) and increasing the allowance for those properties from 1,120 to <br />1,200 square feet. <br />Obviously there can be no end to variety of sizes for accessory structures, but the three <br />sizes listed below provide enough space for the use they are intended to serve, namely <br />storage of vehicles and tools /equipment for maintaining a home /property. <br />One car garage <br />Two car garage <br />Three car garage <br />24 x 12 <br />24 x 24 <br />24 x 34 <br />288 square feet <br />576 square feet <br />1,008 square feet <br />In other words, any property (with a dwelling) in the city regardless of size can now <br />have 1,200 square feet of accessory structure. That equates to an attached three car <br />garage and a 10 x 12 tool shed in the yard. Or an attached two car garage and another <br />two car garage in the yard. <br />Are the current area alloances too restrictive? <br />It may be possible to answer Question 1 (Are the current area allowances too <br />restrictive ?), by looking at how different properties within each of the current levels are <br />treated. One drawback to using property size and only having six categories is that the <br />city is allowing those who just make it past a threshold (1.25 acres, 2.5 acres, 5 acres, <br />10 acres and 20 acres) to have a far higher percentage of accessory structures than <br />someone who just falls short of each threshold. The table on the following page depicts <br />a parcel (Parcel A) that is the minimum acreage for each level, and a second parcel <br />(Parcel B) that is a tenth of an acre short of reaching the level above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.