My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/26/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
07/26/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 12:34:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
07/26/2010
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of <br />the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not <br />limited to, the following factors: <br />1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific <br />policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with <br />the official City Comprehensive Plan. <br />For this rezoning to be consistent, the proposed and use <br />amendment, or the 2030 Comprehensive Plan would need to <br />be adopted by the City Council and accepted by the <br />Metropolitan Council. <br />2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future <br />and uses of the area. <br />The site is adjacent to properties that are guided, zoned, and <br />developed with single family dwellings. The General Business <br />zoning district allows the most intensive commercial uses <br />under the zoning ordinance. As this site has no room for <br />buffering of the residential uses, one of the other commercial <br />zoning districts would be more appropriate. <br />3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards <br />contained herein. <br />The site is currently deficient in regards to several of the <br />conditions of the existing conditional use permit, including the <br />lack of pollution control measures, the lack of a curb along the <br />west side of the building, and the lack of a hood on the <br />exterior lighting. The addition of auto sales would also push <br />them well below the parking requirements of the ordinance. <br />4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public <br />services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. <br />As the site is not served by city utilities, it will not overburden <br />the city's service capacities in that regard. <br />5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of <br />streets serving the property. <br />Maple Street is not developed to an urban street standard. It <br />does not have curb and gutter and is only 22 feet in width. <br />While this can handle the traffic of the two businesses and 9 <br />homes that are present on Maple Street, it is not conducive to <br />adding additional commercial uses. Additionally, all on- street <br />parking is actually occurring on pervious surfacing that may <br />be allowing pollutants to permeate the soil. <br />-56- <br />KI Auto <br />Page 5 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.