My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/11/2010 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2010
>
08/11/2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2014 4:14:50 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 1:48:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/11/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />WS — Item 8 <br />WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />Work Session Item 8 <br />Date: August 11, 2010 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Mary Alice Divine <br />Re: Legacy Update <br />Background <br />Earlier this Spring city staff reviewed the status of the Legacy project with the city <br />council and a proposal to Anoka County to purchase the land that was due to be forfeited <br />in July 2010. The goal was to by -pass the extended repurchase process and attempt to get <br />the property back into private ownership in the timeliest manner. <br />The city made the case that the value of the property was essentially the amount equal to <br />the delinquent taxes that the County would have received absent forfeiture. The city also <br />requested that the purchase be paid for as panels were sold to private parties. <br />The County responded that it was unable to follow the process the city requested. The <br />County is required to sell the property for the appraised value. The County does not take <br />into account the assessments attached to the property, and therefore has placed a <br />significantly higher value on the property. The County also does not statutory process <br />that would allow the City to pay the County on an installment method that the city had <br />requested. <br />Alternatively, staff was working with the loan servicer to come to an agreement to sign <br />over the deed to the city before forfeiture. The banks concluded they wanted to be paid <br />for the property and the properties have been forfeited. <br />Since the property is now in the repurchase phase of the process, staff and consultants <br />have considered other options available. Legislation passed this session which now <br />allows a County to sell property for less than the appraised value for the purpose of <br />redevelopment of blighted properties and affordable housing. The consulting attorney <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.