My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/12/2006 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
04/12/2006 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 4:15:28 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 4:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
04/12/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&ZoningBoard <br />April12,2006 <br />Page 7 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />60days ,notingthatthesame contractorshouldconstructall ofthe units.Mr.Janes <br />addedthatHartford willprovidequalitycontrolfromarchitecturalstandpoint. <br />Mr.Janes wentontosaythatHartfordGroupwill stillownthepropertyandse lltheunits <br />forbuild.Hartford willbeinspectingtheproductanditwillbeintheirbestinterestto <br />makesurewhatisbuiltiswhatisonpaper ,hoping forbestprojectLinoLakeshasever <br />seen.HartfordGroup willmonitortheproject. <br />Mr.Raff erty agreedw iththeimportanceof checks and balancesonaproject. <br />Mr.T ralle madeaMOTIONto table thePlannedUnitDevelopmentFinalPlanfor <br />LegacyTownhomes.MotionwassupportedbyMr.Nelson .Motioncarried 6 –0 . <br />VI.DISCUSSIONITEMS <br />A.GTSTraining <br />S taff reminded the board tocontactDawnBuggeiftheyareinterestedinregisteringfora <br />trainingsession.Staffconfirmedthattheregistrationcostwouldbepaidforbythecity <br />priortotheevent. <br />B.HardwoodCreek <br />Mr.Smyser summarizedthattherewas ajointmeetingofthecitycouncilandallofthe <br />advisoryboardstodiscusstheHardwoodCreekproject.Mr.Smyserasked if the board <br />membershadfurthercommentsor if thosewho hadnotattendedthemeeting hadany <br />questions. <br />Mr.Raffertycommended th e masterplan ningoftheproject .Hec ommentedonthe <br />importanceof p ark land .Heexpressedappreciationforthe op portunitytohavethejoint <br />meeting. <br />Mr.Tralle statedthathehad attended the openhouse ,andwasimpressedwiththe <br />proposed underg r oun dwatering system. <br />Mr.Rootagreedthatlargescaleplanning is best for allsituations.Hisonlyconcernwas <br />the positioningofbigboxstores andthetransitionbetween commercialand r esidential <br />uses. <br />Mr.Ladenagreed withMr.R oot’scomments.Hee xpressedthe projectbringsinnovative <br />ideas,exceptinthecommercialarea.Hew ouldliketoseesomethingdifferentinthe <br />commercialarea. <br />Staff commentedthatthe amountofparklandisanimportantpartof the design.Mr. <br />Smysernotedthatthe ECSs ystemisbeingdeterminedtoseeifitwouldworkonthis <br />site ,and probably only incommercialareas.Thecityisloo kingformoreecologically <br />friendlywaterm anagement .Mr.Smyserstatedthatthec ommercialareas are stillbeing <br />determined andwillre main onholduntil the roadaccessissueisset.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.