My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/13/2003 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
08/13/2003 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2014 10:06:31 AM
Creation date
4/16/2014 10:06:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
08/13/2003
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 13, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />Mr. Grochala stated previously the C ity and County had disagreed on the road <br />improvements and the funding was used elsewhere. He stated what has transpired since <br />that time is that it was decided some impr ovements were needed and in November, 2002 <br />road design plans were given to Anoka C ounty. He stated Anoka County had reviewed <br />the plans and had made suggestions. He indica ted they had received a letter of credit to <br />cover Spirit Hills share of the improvements, with the rest of the funds coming from this <br />development. He stated Anoka County had ag reed to help fund the signalization of the <br />intersection. He noted in order to get the rest of the project done, they needed this project <br />to be approved. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if the taxpayers would pick up any of the cost. Mr. Grochala replied <br />they would not. If anything, if they needed to fill some gaps, it would come out of the <br />State Aid account, so no specific taxpayer dollars would pay for this improvement. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if the people living on Hodgson Road would be able to exit right or left <br />out of their driveways. Mr. Grochala replie d there would be no divider in the Road and <br />the homeowners would have full access both ways. <br />Mr. Corson asked if there was a concern a bout people trying to cross at Ware Road <br />during rush hour hours. Mr. Studenski stat ed they were improving the situation by <br />aligning the two roadways instead of having them offset. <br />Mr. Grochala noted with the signalization of Birch and Hodgson there would be gaps of <br />traffic. <br />Mr. Lyden asked if there would be any tra ffic control at Ware Road and Birch. Mr. <br />Grochala stated there would be stop signs, but in order to get a four way stop or a signal, <br />there were requirements that needed to be met and at this time, that intersection did not <br />meet those requirements, but they would be watching this area. <br />Chair Schaps invited appl icant to make comment. <br />Greg Schlink, 6564 Rollingview Drive, Bruggema n Properties, stated they could review <br />the issues now or comment after the public comments. <br />Chair Schaps invited anyone for or ag ainst the proposal to make comment. <br />Perry Laden, 6425 Hodgson Road, stated he was glad to see the changes with respect to <br />the commercial aspect and what they were proposing now was much more suitable for <br />the neighborhood. He stated they had done a nice job of transitioning between low and <br />medium density and he asked for the same consideration along the Hodgson side. He <br />expressed concern regarding the architecture and elevations of the townhomes. He noted <br />this would be a highly visibl e project and the image of it would have an impact on the <br />City and he hoped the City would want a qua lity project. He stated he believed the <br />proposed businesses fit better for a neighbo rhood business instead of a limited business <br />and encouraged a rezoning. He stated he di d not know if this development rose to the <br />expectations of neighborhood focal point and he asked the City to consider making the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.