Laserfiche WebLink
Main Street Village <br />page 8 <br />this project is that if the existing LOS outside of the proposed project is A or B, the traffic <br />generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one <br />grade. The traffic study submitted by the developer shows that the existing LOS for the <br />Otter Lake Road/Main Street intersection is A and phase one of Main Street Village will <br />decrease it to C. This must be addressed. <br />A number of road improvements will be needed to accommodate additional development <br />(phase two) of the development. These include additional traffic lanes, turn lanes, and a <br />median. Anoka County prepared a preliminary design for needed improvements as part of <br />the project that improved Main Street and constructed the signals at the intersection. In <br />order to address the LOS of the intersection, the conditions of approval for Main Street <br />Village include the requirement that the approval of any additional development of the site <br />will include the Otter Lake Road improvements. <br />7) Lino Lakes has a joint powers agreement with Anoka County that limits the number of <br />accesses that will be allowed on Otter Lake Road (Co. Rd. 84) between Main Street. and <br />Cedar Street. We can have a total of six driveways and three roads. There are five <br />driveways now and two roads. The City must use the allocation wisely. The new <br />southern access on this development site is planned to allow for access to the City's water <br />tower. This will allow the water tower driveway to be on the project's southern access <br />road when it gets built. Then we can eliminate the existing driveway on Otter Lake Road <br />and have one for a future location. An easement to allow City access to the private road is <br />needed and is a condition of approval. <br />Parking: The site plans show the lot layouts and parking. The zoning ordinance does <br />allow for a reduction in the number of required parking stalls in a shared parking situation if <br />the applicant demonstrates throng} a peak parking analysis that the peak demand is less than <br />the normally required number of stalls. A submitted peak parking analysis supports the <br />reduced number of parking stalls. The gas station/car wash lot is not considered in the shared <br />parking analysis, as this lot stands alone for parking, but it has sufficient parking to meet the <br />City requirement. <br />Buildings: The proposal includes four buildings on four separate lots. All the buildings <br />are attractive with brick, rock face block, stucco, EIFS, and metal peaks. A variety of colors <br />and design elements are proposed. <br />The original submittal included "Architectural Design Criteria." We have been working with <br />the developer's team to ensure that the design criteria comply with the City's architectural <br />requirements for commercial buildings. This is included in the approval of the project. <br />*Lot 1, Block 1, Retail: The proposed 6500 sf retail building includes rock face block <br />and precolored 4" block along with EIFS. The tallest parapet on this building is 22' high. <br />The building was revised since the first submittal to include glass windows on the north <br />elevation rather than a solid brick wall. This is a great improvement to the visual <br />attractiveness of the project site. The building colors and materials establish a visual base - <br />middle -top as required_ <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />