My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/14/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
04/14/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:28:32 AM
Creation date
5/7/2014 11:47:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/14/2008
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />AGENDA ITEM 3 E <br />STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration <br />DATE 14 April 2008 <br />SUBJECT 2008 -2009 Non -Union Salaries <br />VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Each year the council is asked to consider non -union salaries. Two components of our <br />review are to provide an Annual Adjustment to all employees in order to maintain our <br />internal equity. We also look at the external market to determine if we are maintaining <br />our marketability. <br />City staff is working with Springsted Inc. to audit certain pay program functions <br />including a review of internal equity, development of a pay program philosophy and a <br />review of pay for performance. <br />Until that is completed, staff is reluctant to make a recommendation on market increases <br />for this group — althon • h a couple appear to be warranted as in the case with AFSCME. <br />Instead, we would recommend the same 3% Annual Adjustment that all employees are <br />scheduled to received in 2008 and is that percentage that is consistent with the <br />metropolitan area. <br />We would ask the council to review the Pay Program after completion of the audit. <br />As with all other employee groups the city proposes an increase of the employers <br />percentage of health insurance contributions by up to 2 %, depending on what happens to <br />our rates. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Approve non -union salaries <br />2. Not approve non -union salaries <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Number One. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.