My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/04/2008 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2008
>
08/04/2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2014 11:08:35 AM
Creation date
5/12/2014 12:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/04/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pat is well known in the legal community for his aggressive representation of municipal clients, and his <br />ability to resolve difficult cases successfully. <br />Thomas M. Sweeney <br />Thomas M. Sweeney has been licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota since 1964, and is <br />admitted to practice in the federal courts. Tom is a member of the American and Minnesota Bar <br />Associations. He is also a member of the Urban, State, and Local Government Law and Law Practice <br />Management Sections of the ABA. Tom is rated as an AV attorney in the Martindale- Hubbell Law <br />Directory, which is the highest rating of attorneys ranked by their peers in the United States. His formal <br />education includes the University of St. Thomas (B.A., 1961) and the University of Minnesota (J.D., <br />1964). <br />In 1964, Tom joined the law firm of Douglas, Sheets & Bell where he practiced in the area of municipal <br />law and represented the City of Shoreview from 1965 to 1975. Tom represented the City of Isle from <br />1976 to 2001 and from 2003 to the present. Tom has represented the City of Blaine since 1972, and the <br />City of Little Canada since 1982. Tom represented the City of Wahkon from 1977 until 1998. During <br />the past nineteen years, Tom has spent approximately 100 percent of his time in the practice of <br />municipal civil law. <br />Few firms have experience as extensive as ours with such favorable results representing cities before the <br />courts of this State. Tom represented the then Village of Shoreview in a special assessment case <br />entitled "In re: Mackubin Street ", in which the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the street assessment <br />levied by Shoreview for the improvement of Mackubin Street. Tom successfully defended special <br />assessment appeals in the Cities of Blaine and Shoreview in the Ramsey County and Dakota County <br />Courts, including a litigated assessment appeal case with the Mounds View School District. <br />Tom represented the City of Blaine in a rezoning case relative to the expansion of Restwood Terrace <br />Mobile Home Park in Anoka County District Court. The Minnesota Supreme Court remanded the case <br />to the trial court for further consideration of the propriety of the denial of the rezoning by the City of <br />Blaine. Tom represented the City of Blaine in a platting case in which the Anoka County District Court <br />upheld the granting of a plat in the Cloud Drive/Radisson Road area. <br />Tom has litigated several zoning cases, including Chandler v. Kroiss and Village of Shoreview. <br />Shoreview prevailed at the trial level in Ramsey County District Court. The Minnesota Supreme Court <br />upheld the issuance of a special use permit by the Shoreview Council for the construction of apartments. <br />Tom successfully represented the Village of Shoreview in several miscellaneous cases, including the <br />subdivision of property, and the collection of connection charges from an apartment complex. This <br />case entitled "McGlynn, Garmaker v. Shoreview" was tried in Ramsey County District Court. <br />Similarly, Tom successfully represented Shoreview in a Ramsey County Court action contesting the <br />results of a referendum relative to the construction of a new city hall. The Ramsey County District <br />Court held that the one vote margin in favor of the referendum was valid and construction of the city <br />hall was able to proceed. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.