My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/13/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
02/13/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2014 1:25:46 PM
Creation date
6/4/2014 12:56:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/13/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />January 9, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br />Pastor Gilbertson stated the trusses had been ordered to be used in the construction of the <br />picnic shelter. <br />Pastor Gilbertson stated the proposed picnic shelter would appear similar to a park <br />shelter. He stated the structure would not be enclosed and the roof material would match <br />the color of the parsonage roof. <br />Mr. Lyden stated at times when working with specific and detailed ordinances, it is <br />necessary to make compromises, which at times can be beneficial. However, when <br />discussing compromises such as attaching existing structures, the City ends up with a <br />compromised product, which is not in anyone's best interest. He stated he would like to <br />see a quality product constructed and would prefer the elimination of the tool shed and <br />approval of a variance to allow the additional 80 square feet for the picnic shelter. <br />Chair Schaps questioned whether the items stored in the tool shed could be stored <br />elsewhere. Pastor Gilbertson stated a local day care leas . ace from the Church and the <br />items stored in the tool shed are the property of the d <br />Chair Schaps asked if the items being stored by <br />garage. Pastor Gilbertson stated the space inside <br />storage of tables and chairs, as well as ad. nal <br />Church could work out the storage situatio <br />care ld be stored inside the <br />garage has been maxed out with the <br />e materials. However, he felt the <br />Mr. Matson suggested that the g d with a floating addition, similar to an <br />addition for a fireplace, to proved . ce for the day care. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated if th uare -f ta_` of buildings are measured according to the size <br />of a foundation, he agreed ' . ate E _ addition may be a reasonable solution. He <br />questioned whether this additi .I storage space could be added without a foundation <br />while still meeting the total square- footage measurement of the ordinance. <br />Chair Schaps stated this would depend upon the meaning of a detached structure. <br />Mr. Matson noted the square- footage of the picnic shelter could be reduced. Chair <br />Schaps agreed this may be the best option. <br />Mr. Corson asked if reducing the square- footage of the picnic shelter would still meet the <br />Church's needs. Pastor Gilbertson responded affirmatively. <br />Ms. Lane questioned whether the trusses ordered for the picnic shelter would still work if <br />the shelter was reduced in size. Pastor Gilbertson stated he would have to review the <br />plans but he believed the trusses would still work. <br />Mr. Rafferty questioned if the applicant would still require approval of the proposed <br />picnic shelter if the square- footage of the shelter was reduced and the tool shed was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.