03/13/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board February 13, 2002 Page 7 • floor area. Mr. Grochala stated this would be something they would need to address in the future. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he or his engineer would like to make comment. Mike Kraft from Shea Architects, Inc. stated they came up with a look that is compatible with what the Board was looking for. The building will have a standing seam metal roof, stucco pattern material around cornice facing, and pillars. The building color will be beige which is compatible with the neighborhood. He also stated the brick colors will be the same as the other brick work in the development. Mr. Kraft stated they would be able to make up for the 3% difference in green space by taking 300 feet away from the drive up area. Mr. Kraft stated one of the differences with TCF Bank is that it is built for customer convenience. He stated TCF Bank has more employees than the average bank and this would account for more parking spaces. He stated there ld always be an available parking space for customers also He stated people h her expectations for service from TCF Bank. Mr. Rafferty asked if the colored floor plan show being shown. Mr. Kraft stated the revised a.._��y is s where another proposed entrance would be. as consistent with the color elevation on the north side of the building Mr. Rafferty asked if the cornice would not be actual stucco; it wo cco on it. Mr. Kraft stated the cornice -like in appearance. Mr. Rafferty asked if th . '`, would ° a ` ay to detract from the drive -thru. Mr. Kraft stated the colonial form of bui ; ing brings attention to the building and not to the drive —thru. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:08 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to recommend approval of the TCF Bank Site Plan with the following conditions: 1. That a site development agreement be executed by and between the City of Lino Lakes and TCF Bank. 2. Revised Site Plan be submitted that satisfies the impervious surface coverage requirements. • 3. Revised Floor Plan and Details be submitted that reflects the change in building entrance. The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty.