My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
09/11/2002 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 3:36:22 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 12:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
09/11/2002
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Page 14 <br />The architectural appearance of the building, finish materials and color selections are <br />considered consistent with the Marketplace PDO design guidelines. <br />With respect to parking, the standards for calculating the off -street parking requirements <br />for shopping centers are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code. For the <br />purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the <br />gross building area. <br />Staff stated a total of 70 off -street parking stalls are required for the proposed shopping <br />center. The applicant's plan calls for 72 stalls and exceeds the minimum off -street <br />parking supply requirement. To be noted howe er, is that one additional handicap <br />parking stall (totaling three spaces) should be <br />requirements. <br />to satisfy applicable State <br />At 18 feet in depth and 9 feet in width, all ,p aria. ave been found to <br />meet the minimum dimensional requirements ` -ction 3, of the Ordinance. <br />Likewise, the proposed 24 -foot wide driv-'so meet minimum Ordinance <br />requirements. <br />With respect to landscaping, staff noted <br />tree replacement plan was required to <br />for one replacement was intended f'p <br />the applicant identified 217 si <br />subdivision. Of these trees, <br />trees to be provided as part of <br />t <br />tre <br />with the original PDO approval, a <br />operation with City Staff. A one <br />e inventory previously prepared by <br />es or greater) within the proposed <br />intender» preserved. This would require 201 <br />opment of the entire site. <br />Staff indicated <br />Specifically, <br />have been <br />have been p <br />proposed along <br />mature of S "ct c <br />ed along the I <br />along Ap <br />'LL wetl, <br />Ian, a variety of trees are proposed on site. <br />ine, ilorado Blue Spruce and Cranberry Viburnum <br />tate corridor while a row of Little Leaf Linden trees <br />Drive. Additionally, row of Dogwoods has been <br />In review of the landsca <br />staff recommends the following: <br />1. The Little Leaf Linden trees along Apollo Drive be changed to a Red or White <br />Oak and spaced at 50 feet. <br />2. Overstory trees be incorporated into the plaza fronting the building replacing the <br />proposed unidentified plantings. <br />3. The coniferous trees along I -35 be changed to Austrian Pine and White Spruce. <br />4. The proposed Purpleleaf Plum trees be changed to disease resistant ornamental <br />crab trees. <br />5. Plantings within the limits of the east ponding area be eliminated. <br />6. Tamerack Trees be provided around the east ponding area (to tie into the <br />Marketplace development) and be located above the 100 year HWL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.