09/11/2002 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2002 Page 15 Additionally, a master landscaping plan, encompassing the entire subdivision, should be submitted for City review and approval. The plan should demonstrate conformance with the tree replacement requirements for the development. With respect to trash enclosures, staff noted, according to Section 3, Subd. 4.G of the Ordinance, all refuse and recyclable materials must be stored within the principal building or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear yard) that is totally screened from eye level view from neighboring uses and public rights of way. As shown on the submitted site plan, trash enclosures have been proposed on east and west sides of the building. While the proposed locations technically meet the s pir concern exists in regard to the placement of th the visibility of the enclosure from Apollo suggested that it be shifted to the south and building. Staff indicated while the multi -tenant buildi design guidelines are specific to buildi requirements should likewise be applie consistency. In this regard, wall sign with the following: ents of the Ordinance, some cture. Of specific concern is asize the enclosure, it is de of the principal Mats of the Marketplace PDO pollb Drive, it is believed the building in order to maintain area ilding should be in accordance 1. Building fronts should maximum width equal exceed 36 a maxiMutti7laverage sign height of 30 inch and a cent of the lease width. Capitol letters should not 2. Building a maximum average sign height of 24 inches and a maxim width equals k 0% of the lease width. Capitol letters should not excee' 3. In no case s building fronts al sign area, per business, exceed 100 square feet for square feet for building rears. Staff indicated the applicant is proposing one freestanding sign in the southwest corner of the development. Such sign location is considered acceptable but should not exceed 25 feet in height, consistent with other signs in the Marketplace development. As required by ordinance, a lighting plan identifying illumination levels on the subject site has been provided. The proposed illumination levels and fixture details have been found to be acceptable. Details regarding fixture type have not been submitted. As a condition of site and building plan approval, specific fixture details should be submitted subject to review and approval by staff. According to the Ordinance, the source of lights should be hooded and controlled so as not to illuminate adjacent properties or public rights -of -way. DRAFT MINUTES