Laserfiche WebLink
• 5. The surface water plan must be evaluated to determine environmental <br />impacts. <br />• <br />6. That at aany proposed lighting canopy is designed with recessed lights and with no <br />fascia Lighting. <br />7. That Gar kinaa be reduced to City minim <br />um stanU'ai Us. <br />lotion b:: Snyder, second t - f' ; A' .4s» All approved. <br />IY ®Cali Litt 0..y a�i �l1%6.]Gr , JGLL31 IiA by l UI i IV IIGi . j ii ai,p Li1%' <br />LIVID g 11i esters Lutheran 1 1011U1 Li 11 <br />The Environmental Board Recommended on January 29, 2003 that the ivposed <br />.i <br />Living Waters Lutheran Church Addition be approved with the folio ing comments: <br />1. There are hiah-priority protection areas to the North of the cxis+ii u path. This <br />area should not be disturbed. <br />2. it. '1GU be �s in proposed <br />iv L JtJl <br />landscape plan should include building lv <br />foundation giants. <br />4. _Dr i% iJ� r;d Ji:i ,d Jh Ir !r I .Y \L at I:uJ.+ t <br />into the ground. <br />•� <br />inches of topsoil <br />r' Any ':.�:- .6i: -..v h.- .::!.�! dam.!!• -...- !• +'. ' -,! '•i, . <br />8. A 1V new shut Itll lY should follow flu! Itil lu uuiueiil les it l <br />Ordi, lance. <br />and swale areas. The <br />s �;.. r..+..3-1 <br />i! Iv! SJUjJ iiy i7 iCiv! f 1L./: iwtva.I <br />+bar. f.'s:. <br />## -' <br />ti IC neV1� L)I aft LVl111lu <br />^ : � +�... plan ' R h � # Red Oaks. <br />Sugar maples in the Ulan should be changed to I led maple or Oaks. <br />Motion Lotion to approve by Haien, Second by Doniin. All approved. <br />® Page 2 <br />