My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 1:29:42 PM
Creation date
6/18/2014 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oakwood View Page 2 January 20, 2005 <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Introduction <br />As explained in previous memorandums, the proposed Oakwood View plans provide for essentially two <br />different improvements on different sides of the property. This includes a new street and utilities that <br />provide for 10 single family units on the north side of the property, along with the construction of an <br />enabling residence (duplex) and parking area adjacent to the existing church on the south side of the <br />property. Remaining portions of the property (center and northeast) not proposed for improvements are <br />essentially wetland and/or wooded areas. <br />• <br />Geotechnical <br />1. A geotechnical report has been provided (GME, May 14, 2004). The report mentions that at the time <br />of the investigation (April 2004), the groundwater levels were probably lower than normal, and that <br />levels may be higher at the time of construction. This may have an impact on construction. Building <br />elevations (low floor, lowest opening, etc.) must be constructed in accordance with the minimum <br />requirements of the City of Lino Lakes as further described in this memorandum. <br />2. Per the geotechnical report, it is expected that dewatering will be required for installation of the <br />sanitary sewer and water. The applicant shall be responsible for attaining any permits as required for <br />de- watering. <br />3. The report indicated that much of the soil consists of silty sands. For the building and paved areas, <br />soft, loose, or unsuitable soils must be removed and replaced with granular materials per the <br />geotechnical engineer's recommendations in the report. Bedding for utility foundations shall also be <br />prepared in accordance with the report. It is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be retained <br />and consulted throughout the construction process. <br />Drainage <br />1. An outlet control structure is shown for Pond 11 (NW Pond) on the Utility Plan. However, the invert <br />elevation of the receiving manhole (STMH -6 on the Grading Plan) is 891.8 which is higher than the <br />invert of the existing CB 15 -2A on Oakwood Lane (889.24 as stated on the plan). Assuming that all <br />drainage is intended to flow to the west, this would result in back pitch (or flow to the east) to the <br />existing CB and result in standing water in the CB. It is suggested that the invert of the proposed <br />STMH 6 be lowered to match the invert of the existing pipe to allow proper flow to the west. <br />2. The Grading Plan provides floor elevations for the proposed housing units (3 -4 different elevations <br />are provided for each unit). A legend must be provided that clarifies what the individual elevations <br />refer to (i.e., walk -out, garage floor, first floor, etc.). This information is critical in order to verify <br />that City requirements are being met as follows: The lowest floor elevations must meet the City's <br />minimum requirement of 2 feet above the 100 year flood level, and 4 feet above normal water <br />elevations and groundwater. In addition, the lowest building opening must be at least one foot above <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.