My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
02/09/2005 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 1:29:42 PM
Creation date
6/18/2014 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/09/2005
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oakwood View Page 3 January 20, 2005 <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />• <br />the emergency overflow location. Any additional RCWD freeboard requirements over onsite wetland <br />basins must also be met. <br />3. Revised Hydro -Cad calculations have been received and comments are as follows: <br />a) The existing conditions models an area of 737,930 square feet, while the proposed conditions <br />models an area of 726,909 square feet. Thus, 11,021 square feet is missing for the proposed <br />calculations and should be accounted for. <br />b) The calculations utilize infiltration characteristics that use NRCS Soils Type "A ". Existing <br />condition curve number computations use NRCS Soils Type "B ". The existing soil types <br />utilized must be consistent. If the existing soils are Type A, then existing condition <br />computations must use Type A soils. Proposed condition numbers shall use Type B soils in <br />all disturbed areas where Type A soils exist. Otherwise, if Type B soils do exist, the <br />infiltration rate will need to correspond to Type B soils accordingly. According to the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District (RCWD) stormwater infiltration packet, this rate is 0.25 in. per hr. <br />Revised calculations must be provided as the results are critical for assuring that low floor <br />building requirements are met. <br />4. Per the previous review, the City received a Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes <br />(CAPROC) from RCWD. All remaining conditions of the CAPROC must be completed as required <br />by RCWD. <br />5. An NPDES Phase II permit has been forwarded to the MPCA. All requirements of the Permit, <br />including the submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City, shall be <br />completed prior to engaging in grading activities. <br />Utilities <br />1. Previous reviews expressed a concern with regards to adequate pressures and circulation for the long <br />dead end line to the Church and enabling facility. In the event that additional pressure may be <br />required, the applicant shall be responsible for any boosters as may be necessary. Insulation must be <br />provided for any water and sewer pipe where a minimum 8 feet of cover cannot be attained. <br />2. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum <br />Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum <br />Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. <br />3. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. <br />4. At least 2 gate valves must be provided on the new 8 -inch diameter watermain. It is suggested that <br />they be provided at the northerly connection point (Oakwood Lane), and on the south side of the tee <br />at the end of the new Oakwood Lane street extension. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.