Laserfiche WebLink
'Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 2 March 4, 2005 <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />• <br />2. The Traffic Study has been reviewed and comments are provided within this memorandum. <br />Generally, the data and conclusions provided in the report are not complete and the applicant has <br />been requested to re -work the study. <br />3. The utility plan provided is not considered to be complete for construction purposes at this time. <br />However, the utility plan as presented in concept is acceptable, and the comments provided herein are <br />based upon the extent of plans completed to date. For example, storm sewer pipe sizes and structure <br />invert and rim elevations are not provided. Standard utility plates, details, construction notes, <br />provisions for erosion control, etc. must all eventually be provided as well. <br />4. The applicant has provided copies of correspondence to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). <br />The applicant shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the RCWD accordingly. <br />5. The proposed site development is located adjacent to two County roadways. The plat and site plan <br />will therefore require the review and approval of Anoka County, both for the plat itself and with <br />regards to driveway and site access. It is likely that the County will have comments with regards to <br />right of way dedication and access from Apollo Drive. <br />6. Drainage and utility easements must be provided on the Preliminary Plat as described herein. <br />Drainage <br />1. The first floor elevations shown for the proposed buildings would appear to be acceptable based on <br />the information provided. However, because actual building plans are not provided, it is not known if <br />there are proposed to be basements, lower openings, etc. In accordance with City standards, the <br />lowest floor elevation must meet the City's minimum requirement of 2 feet above the 100 year flood <br />level, 4 feet above normal water elevations and groundwater, and at least one foot over the <br />emergency overflow elevation. The actual overflow location and elevation for Pond 1 must be <br />provided on the plan. <br />2. The full Hydro -Cad calculations must be provided by the applicant so that they can be verified <br />further against the previous design parameters provided in the S.E.H. calculations. At this time, only <br />portions have been provided. Support computations are also needed for the stage- discharge used in <br />the Hydro -Cad model <br />3. Floor and /or any low opening elevations for the existing building directly to the west must be verified <br />against the 100 -year and overflow elevations. Based on the information provided, it would appear <br />that the 100 -year elevation of the pond may be higher than the building's low floor. <br />4. Per correspondence provided with RCWD, the applicant is incorporating the use of infiltration basins <br />on the site prior to discharge to the pond. This will aid in providing effective stormwater <br />management and water quality, as discharge from the pond into the storm sewer system running <br />• south down Apollo Drive (as shown) shall be limited to the originally designed system limits. The <br />plans must ultimately receive final approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. <br />