Laserfiche WebLink
Marketplace 3rd Addition, page 2 <br />The comprehensive plan guides the site for Mixed Use land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) <br />owth area and a portion is within the existing MUSA boundary. Public water and sanitary sewer are available <br />within the surrounding street network. <br />Planned Unit Development <br />The revised layout will use the existing lot lines, but slightly change some of the building placements, and <br />designate the two lots adjacent to Apollo Drive for single user buildings. Specifically, the Design Guidelines <br />established for the entire Marketplace development as a part of Ordinance 16 -01 will need to be slightly <br />modified. <br />Setback Standards <br />Within a Planned Unit Development (or Planned Development Overlay) the setbacks are approved as a part of <br />the final development plans. The setbacks proposed are both appropriate for this type of development and in <br />keeping with the rest of the Marketplace development. <br />Lot Sizes <br />Within a Planned Unit Development (or Planned Development Overlay) each lot is designed to accommodate a <br />building pad and sufficient parking to serve the intended use of the lot. The proposed lot areas and widths are in <br />conformance with the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore appropriate. <br />Architectural Design Standards <br />Ordinance 16 -01 which rezoned this site to PDO (Planned Development Overlay), also established the design <br />standards for the buildings on site. The applicant is now proposing what staff feels is a significant improvement <br />to the overall design of the multi -tenant buildings. Staff does have a couple of concerns in regards to the <br />elevations, which are addressed below. The final design for the multi -tenant buildings will need to replace the <br />existing elevations within the design standards. Minimal changes will also need to be made to the text attached <br />to Ordinance 16 -01. None of the changes will be substantive changes, rather just correcting portions that refer <br />to the old building designations (A -F) and then designating which sections will apply to each of the new <br />building lots. <br />Building Materials/ Elevations <br />The elevations attached to this report are a result of ongoing discussions between staff and the applicant. <br />Improvements were made to the previously approved design, including more brick and variation to the facade <br />accomplished by stepping out the ends of the buildings. However, staff is recommending conditions of <br />approval that require the cornice be EIFS or better with flashing used only to maintain the integrity of the <br />cornice, not as an architectural element. <br />Building Height <br />The scale of the submitted elevations is not known; however it is a single story building and therefore would not <br />exceed the maximum height allowed within the zoning district. <br />