My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/11/2006 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
01/11/2006 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2014 12:45:10 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 1:07:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/11/2006
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 14, 2005 <br />Page 4 <br />Vice Chair Tralle opened the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. <br />Vice Chair Tralle invited applicant to make comment. <br />Mike Cashman, 1772 Midway Road, Wisconsin, representing Keller, stated originally <br />they followed the specs from the City of Lino Lakes and then in August the City changed <br />its specs and they changed their plan. He noted they met all of the criteria that the City <br />was looking for. He indicated they were on a cul -de -sac and not on a main street as their <br />neighbors were. He noted they would not see a lot of the building from the main road. <br />Mr. Rafferty stated he agreed with the cul -de -sac observation. He asked if he believed <br />they were putting in something comparable as the existing neighbors. He asked if <br />Summit had seen their plans. Mr. Cashman responded Summit had seen their plans. He <br />noted the back of Summit's building was facing the front of theirs. <br />Mr. Hyden inquired about the location of the trash enclosure. Mr. Bengston stated the <br />location could be worked out as a later time, but they wanted it closer to the building and <br />not open to the cul -de -sac. <br />Mr. Cashman responded he did not have any problem with that. <br />Mr. Hyden asked where the tires would be stored. Mr. Cashman responded all tires <br />would be stored inside the building. <br />Mr. Pogalz asked if tractor trailers would be parked at any one time outside of the <br />building. Mr. Cashman responded that would vary depending on the day, but in most <br />instances, the vehicles would be serviced the same day and would be gone by night fall. <br />He noted there might be a few instances once in awhile where a vehicle would be on the <br />lot overnight to be serviced the next day. <br />Mr. Tralle asked if all old tire storage would also be inside. Mr. Cashman responded they <br />would be. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked if they would move their trash enclosure to the north side of the <br />building. Mr. Cashman responded they could move it there. <br />Mr. Rafferty asked what would happen to the trash enclosure if they put on their addition. <br />Mr. Cashman responded they would either have to consider moving it, or putting it <br />inside. <br />Mr. Laden asked if they would want to strengthen their entrance for easier public access. <br />He indicated the front of this building lacked this. He requested the applicant think about <br />this. <br />Mr. Nelson agreed and noted an entrance more inviting would go a long way. <br />Mr. Hyden asked if they agreed to all of the conditions. Mr. Cashman responded they <br />were agreeable with the conditions. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.