Laserfiche WebLink
preliminary Plat <br />Lots: The lots meet requirements for lot depth, lot width, and road frontage, but fall short of the 10,800 square <br />feet of upland required for R -1 lots. Lot 1 is 166 square feet under the requirement and Lot 2 is 1,072 square <br />feet under the requirement. This would result in a deviation of approximately 1.5% and 9.5% respectively. <br />State law requires the following finings to be made in order to grant the approval of a variance. Staff has <br />completed the findings in regards to the upland lot area reduction based on the revised submittal: <br />FINDINGS <br />In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a <br />finding of fact: <br />a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls. <br />With the upland lot area requirements of the zoning ordinance this parcel would only be able to be <br />developed with one single family dwelling. A parcel of this size could normally be developed with <br />multiple homes if it wasn't for the wetlands that occupy the majority of the site. While it could <br />still be developed with a single family dwelling, a deviation of less than six percent from the strict <br />enforcement of the ordinance is minor reduction. <br />b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not <br />created by the landowner. <br />Other land in the same district is required to meet minimum lot sizes of 10, 800 square feet. In this <br />instance the lots being created are nearly three times that size. The plight of the landowner is due <br />to the nearly seventy five percent of the land that is covered by wetland area. Because of this the <br />applicant is requesting to reduce the upland lot area requirements by less than six percent. <br />c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />Other land in the same district is required to meet minimum lot sizes of 10, 800 square feet. In this <br />instance the lots being created are nearly three times that size. While the site could easily be used <br />for one single family dwelling, the reduction of upland lot area of less than six percent is <br />considered minor and reasonable. <br />d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege <br />that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same <br />district. <br />Other land in the same district is required to meet minimum lot sizes of 10, 800 square feet. In this <br />instance the lots being created are nearly three times that size. A minor deviation of less than six <br />percent will not give the applicant any special privilege. <br />e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />The lots proposed will exceed the lot area requirements nearly three times over, therefore the spirit <br />and intent of the ordinance will not be violated by a minor deviation in the upland lot area of less <br />than six percent. <br />