My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/12/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
07/12/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 2:30:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/12/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
06/23/00 09:44 HERITAGE DEUELOPMENT,INC. 4 651 982 2499 <br />NO.484 P002/002 <br />4. Why does SECTION C paragraph (2) call for the replacement of similar trees <br />removed; however paragraph (7) does not allow certain species to be replanted? <br />If a tree is not worth replacing it is also not worth saving. i.e. Box elder is a <br />pioneer and invasive species and should be treated more as a weed than a tree to <br />be saved. <br />5. Trees located within a delineated wetland are already protected; why require <br />additional inventorying and preservation? <br />6. Why would boulevard trees added to the project not count as part of the <br />replacement? This seems punitive. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.