My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/12/2000 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2000
>
07/12/2000 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2014 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
6/30/2014 2:30:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
07/12/2000
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Marmon Keystone <br />July 12, 2000 <br />page 3 <br />• Landscaping <br />Marmon Keystone and TC Fab to the east are coordinating their landscape plans. The <br />landscaping plan was not finished in time to be reviewed for this report. We expect to <br />have the landscaping plan in time for the P & Z meeting. <br />• Utilities <br />Sanitary sewer and water service exist on the north edge of the site. This site should <br />connect to the existing facilities there. (The City vacated the 74th St. right of way on May <br />22 but retained a drainage and utility easement.) <br />Stormwater management on this site includes a pond shared by the property on the east. <br />This common pond will serve both sites. Grading on this site, the TC Fab site to the east, <br />and the unsold property to the west is interrelated. <br />Because of this, the design and review of these two sites requires coordination. <br />Unfortunately, the design of each site and the coordination between them is not at a point <br />where staff can recommend approval. <br />(City Hall lost power on Friday, July 7, due to a storm. This interfered with finalizing the <br />City Engineer's memo. The attached memo was preliminary, but gives some indication <br />of the unresolved issues. We will send a final memo before the meeting.) <br />• Parking <br />For light manufacturing, our code requires at least one parking spaces per 2000 sf of <br />gross floor area or one space per employee, whichever is greater. The office area <br />requires 3 spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For the purposes of calculating parking <br />spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />gross <br />area <br />90% <br />code <br />requirement <br />required <br />spaces <br />total footprint <br />19,200 sf <br />office <br />2,048 sf <br />1843 <br />3 plus <br />one space per 200 sf <br />12 <br />mfg /warehouse <br />81,000 sf <br />72,900 <br />one space per 2000 sf <br />36 <br />TOTAL <br />48 <br />The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for <br />24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that <br />previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing <br />unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If <br />parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.