01/10/2007 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2006 Page 8 Ms. Krall stated that the master plan describes a highly enhanced buffer as screening and landscaping that includes fencing, etc. to include light and noise buffering. Mr. Smyser explained that the city of Lino Lakes has a MUSA reserve in which the city is allowed to allocate the available MUSA as they see fit with each development. Board Members determined that they would like to remove the last two paragraphs on page 35 referring to big box. Mr. Tralle commented that the city will not be forcing anyone to sell but this master plan will allow those who want to develop an opportunity to do so. Core Development stated that if the amendment moves forward this evening, then their proposal will not fit into this proposed plan. He said they have a big project and are prepared to participate financially. Mr. Nelson asked how long they expect to need to work with the city and the county. Mr. Coyle replied the big box is prepared to go in immediately, would fit the access points, and would fit within the proposed traffic and confirmed that he would like to move the access point further north on Hodgson. He requested that the board table the item. Mr. Tralle asked when they need to move ahead. Mr. Smyser stated that the earlier they establish rules for development in this area the better. Mr. Coyle stated that the plan as presented forecloses opportunities that could be available to the city and he would like a chance to try and work on their proposed plan. Mr. Rafferty asked if it would be beneficial to wait to make their decision to ensure they have accommodated all parties involved. Mr. Smyser addressed that the location of the access point on Hodgson road is a critical piece of the master plan, that the issue has been addressed and all proposals have been looked at extensively for a long time, and that the proposed location is where the city firmly believes it should be. Mr. Rafferty expressed concern that all counties are not on board with each other at this point. Mr. Krall responded that the county has not acknowledged improvements in this area because no development plan is in order for this area. Ms. Krall said they are not able to move ahead with further planning until a plan is in order. She is not convinced there is as much foreclosure with potential business as is being stated tonight. Mr. Nelson appreciated staff's efforts over the years in the planning of this area. Mr. Nelson suggested that the board continue to discuss this further and that the board has not had adequate time to discuss the plan. Mr. Smyser stated that the city should not make decisions based on one applicant's submittal, adding it is the responsibility of the city to look at the big picture and not what DRAFT MINUTES • • •