My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/27/2003 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2003
>
01/27/2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 12:58:38 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/27/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Specific Highlights <br />Premature Subdivision Standards and MUSA Allocation Criteria: These are <br />included in the General Provisions, Sec. 1002. A proposed plat will be compared to these <br />standards to ensure there is adequate infrastructure to support the plat. <br />Several items refer to the City's growth management policy: this is Ordinance 01 -03, <br />which will set out specific methods to monitor growth and keep it at the desired level. <br />Sketch Plan Review: An informal sketch plan step has been added. It is not mandatory <br />but is strongly recommended. We expect most developers will participate. <br />Preliminary Plat: Requirements include a tree preservation plan and a phasing plan. <br />Tree Plan: The tree plan requirements do not mandate preserving a specified number <br />or percentage of trees. Rather, they require a complete inventory of all significant trees <br />on the site. The inventory will indicate which trees will be affected by the development. <br />City staff and the developer will discuss the potential for saving trees, and the plan will <br />then clearly list which trees will be lost and which will be saved. If trees are lost that <br />were designated to be saved, they must be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. <br />Phasing Plan: The required phasing plan for each plat will specify a schedule for <br />the final platting of portions of the development. We then can track exactly how many <br />lots will be created in each of several years in the future. This section links the ordinance <br />to the growth management policy. In fact, there is some overlap. <br />Final Plat: Requirements include bringing final plats through the Planning & Zoning <br />Board as well as the City Council. Because of the importance of the phasing plans, staff <br />thought it a good idea to have the P & Z aware of how the growth management system is <br />working. <br />Both the P & Z and City Council supported a requirement that a specified amount of <br />progress in building out the first phase before subsequent phases can be final platted. The <br />ordinance requires, on the bottom of page 1005.5, that building permits be issued for 40% <br />of the units in the previous phase. <br />Minor Subdivisions: An important change from our current procedures is that the draft <br />ordinance states that minor subdivisions would be reviewed administratively, rather than <br />go through the P & Z and City Council. This change is intended to reduce the time and <br />expense —for the applicant and the City —for relatively simple lot splits. With clear <br />requirements for lot dimensions, wastewater treatment and water facilities, upland <br />minimums, etc., it is clear whether or not a proposed lot split meets City requirements. If <br />the application meets the requirements, it should be approved with little delay. <br />Applicants always have the opportunity to request a variance from the requirements or <br />• appeal the staff decision. A variance or appeal would then go through the P & Z and City <br />Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.