Laserfiche WebLink
Bruggeman <br />page 8 <br />from three to eight or even twelve units. The area for each block was provided. The <br />average for all 27 blocks is just over 24,000 sf per block. This seems a reasonable means <br />of fulfilling the requirement. <br />Setbacks: The plan meets the standard 40' setbacks from Hodgson Rd. (minor <br />arterial), Birch St. (major collector), and Ware Rd. (minor collector). The plan proposes <br />25' setbacks from internal, local streets, rather than the standard 30'. <br />The applicant promotes the following reasons in support of the reduced setbacks: <br />The central, private recreational open space is a response to recommendations by the <br />P & Z and the City Council. Smaller building setbacks allow for a larger central open <br />area <br />Smaller setbacks allow for greater separation from adjacent properties on the southern <br />border of the site <br />Smaller setbacks allow for shorter driveways. With multiple driveways along the <br />street (some of which are shared and are 40' wide), the decrease in length has a <br />marked, positive visual effect. This also creates less impervious driveway pavement. <br />In considering these reasons, full 30' setbacks would compress the central open space <br />area and the open area on the southern border of the site. In both areas, the proposed <br />ponds would need to be reconfigured slightly. <br />On several buildings, patios built on the building ends would lie within the 25' setback. <br />Decks or balconies can be 20' from the right of way, and slab patios are not subject even <br />to that since they are not raised. As to the small privacy fence typically constructed <br />between such patios, fence height limitations in the zoning ordinance are aimed at single <br />family lots and don't translate well to townhome arrangements whose units do not front <br />on streets. There is no inherent danger with the proposed fence and patio arrangement, <br />though increasing the distance between patio and street would be desirable. <br />Staff recognizes the direct trade off between setbacks and the open areas. The site does <br />not include significant natural resource features to be saved by the additional open space, <br />e.g., oak stands or wetlands. However, the open space areas were incorporated at the <br />City's recommendation, and follow the purposes of a PUD in the creation of at least 50% <br />open space. This justifies the reduced setbacks. <br />Building Design: <br />Residential: The design of the townhomes typically is reviewed as part of the site and <br />building plan, which is an administrative review. Because the structures themselves may <br />be of interest as part of the PUD design, the information is presented here. <br />The front facades include vinyl siding and stone veneer with vinyl shakes on gable ends. <br />The sides and rears have no stone, and the sides have only vinyl siding. The zoning <br />ordinance requires 25% of the combined area of all facades of a structure to be brick, <br />