Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 14, 2001 <br />Page 11 <br />Parks and Trails: The Park Board discussed the plan on March 5. This must be <br />replaced. They recommended that Outlot B and Lot 1 Block 4 be dedicated for park. The <br />Judds, who live immediately to the east of Lot 1, had expressed interest in acquiring part <br />of the parcel. <br />In addition, the existing Highland Meadows Park would lose some land to the new Arlo <br />Lane, which must be replaced. <br />A trail connection must be provided to Main St. <br />Typically, parkland was labeled on a final plat and dedicated to the City at the time of <br />recording the plat. TSM Development preferred to label the park as outlot and deed it to <br />the City. Staff agreed with this for the Highland Meadows West (first addition) plat. <br />However, the parklands had not been deeded to the City. This must be done before <br />further development occurs. <br />Natural Features: There was a historic oak savannah on the west side of the property. <br />There may be some small pocket wetlands on the site. There had not been a delineation <br />prepared. <br />Other Issues: There were several issues relating to the first two stages that would <br />need to be addressed before the 3`d Addn. could proceed. These included the association <br />document for the townhomes to the south; deeding several outlots to adjacent properties, <br />and documentation relating to the trail through the utilities easement. In addition, the <br />parkland had not yet been deeded to the City. These issues were being discussed with the <br />developer. <br />Joel Cooper, Developer, stated a wetland delineation had been done and an application <br />submitted to Rice Creek Watershed with the stipulation that the wetland be verified once <br />the snow was gone. He stated all of the lots conformed to R -1 zoning. He stated the oak <br />trees along the west line would be preserved. There would be no grading done to that <br />area. <br />Chair Schaps asked what the price range of the home were. Mr. Cooper replied <br />$180,000 up to $250,000. <br />Mr. Cooper stated the existing homes would stay in place, but those homes would <br />probably need to be remodeled. <br />Chair Schaps stated his concern with respect to their not being enough acreage set aside <br />for parkland. He asked if the Park Board had any concern about the parkland in the area. <br />Ms. Sherman replied the Board recommended Outlot B and Lot 1, Block 4 be dedicated <br />for park. <br />Mr. Lyden shared Chair Schaps concerns regarding the parks. He stated in the past the <br />parkland was always the left over piece instead of it being the most accessible piece and <br />that was a major drawback they had seen. <br />