Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />April 14, 1999 <br />Page 9 <br />Mr. Dunn stated the Planning and Zoning Board is going to be dealing with this a lot and <br />the old rules do not apply. Everything is now being driven by a PDO. Approval will be a <br />value judgment. The plan is limited by the number of acres available. Buffer zones and <br />how wetlands are treated need to be provided for in the developers agreement. The City <br />and staff have to try to define a typical building in an area like this. The price of the lot <br />will drive the cost of the home. The physical size of the home does not drive the price of <br />the lot. <br />Mr. Dunn expressed concern regarding the clarifications on page 3, Item 8. He stated a <br />more definitive determination needs to be made regarding tree preservation. He asked if <br />there will be any problem regarding assessments in the cul -de -sac arrangement if <br />improvements need to be made on 12th Avenue. Mr. Powell ad may be a problem <br />assessing those homes because they do not front 12th Avenue `�e sta that is a legal <br />determination. He added the City is not proposing a set a <br />Ms. Lane asked if the trail paving will be done to <br />trails will be paved prior to development of the lo <br />paved prior to development of the lots. The d <br />regarding the design of the trail. The tra <br />Mr. Dunn referred to page 5 of the <br />develop guidelines for R -1 and <br />be well advised to have those <br />Mr. Steve Arndorfer, <br />many different id <br />directly onto 1 <br />regarding the n <br />he also asked if the <br />stated the trails will be <br />ill b °= working with City staff <br />ccording to City standards. <br />rho �0, 19� , meeting minutes. He suggested staff <br />O. He stated again that the City would <br />eloped. <br />for' "''regrine Pass, stated the plan has gone through <br />tial layout called for 11 -12 lots. Three of those lots went <br />our lots on Holly to the south. Staff was concerned <br />f driveways going out onto the road. <br />Mr. Arndo <br />back and th <br />are six large <br />ed stating that on a regular plan the wetland would have been cut <br />would not have been room for a buffer. Lot #6 faces south/west but there <br />es in the backyard. He stated he likes the natural setting of the area and <br />does not want to lose that. A big priority is to work out a way to keep the buffer <br />easement in tact. It is easier to do that with a bigger buffer zone. It is possible to <br />permanently mark the buffers. Many plantings will be done possibly including wild <br />flowers. <br />Mr. Arndorfer continued stating that he is getting to the point that the development will <br />be cost prohibitive. He stated he is opposed to losing another lot. The lot price is <br />anticipated to be an average of $75,000. The goal is to stay in R -1X zoning. He noted <br />that the commercial materials will be removed. The house will be torn down also. All <br />homes are walk outs. <br />