My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/11/1998 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
03/11/1998 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 11:21:19 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 8:41:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
03/11/1998
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 11, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />7. All trash handling equipment is fully enclosed and screened from view of <br />neighboring properties. <br />8. In compliance with Town Center design guidelines, site light fixture selection <br />give attention to both function and aesthetics. <br />9. Site wetlands be specifically delineated and protected. (A delineation has been <br />completed) <br />10. A grading and drainage plan be submitted which is subject to review and approval <br />by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. (In process) <br />11. That all site signage comply with applicable Sign Ordinance requirements. <br />Mr. Wessel addressed the group, explaining that the first phase of the subdivision was <br />accomplished last year with the second phase delayed due to awaiting approval from the <br />Metropolitan Council. Through use of visual aids, Mr. Wessel pointed out the proposed <br />second -phase development. He pointed out the need to obtain Board approval at this time <br />contingent upon subdivision approval in April, in order to keep the overall project on <br />track. <br />Mr. Johnson requested clarification regarding use of the Early Childhood Learning Center <br />after it is no longer occupied by the School District. Mr. Wessel explained that this <br />facility is intended to accommodate expansion needs following the School District's 10- <br />year lease period. <br />Chair Schaps asked about the difference between the size of the current City Hall and the <br />planned facility. Mr. Wessel indicated that the new City Hall will be approximately three <br />times as large as the current facility, allowing for consolidation of the majority of City <br />services. <br />Mr. Dunn asked about specific approval expectations. Mr. Wessel stated that overall <br />response to the design has been favorable; however, there has been controversy about the <br />architectural guidelines in general. He added that materials have been defined as brick, <br />metal roof, and glass, with some wood accents. The specific brick, roof color, and wood <br />finishes will be determined by the Town Center Committee. <br />Mr. Dunn then asked about the architectural style. Mr. Wessel explained that the design <br />is meant to feel more rural than urban; more informal than institutional. Mr. Reese of <br />LPA stated that the Town Center design does not coincide with any particular style <br />definition; but, if he had to make a comparison, it would be a vernacular, barn-like style, <br />intended to be friendly and comfortable. He added that the proposed materials will be <br />long - lasting and appropriate for a civic -type building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.