Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />October 8, 1997 <br />Page 12 <br />J. The southern 117 feet, more or less, of Outlot A be combined with <br />adjacent Lot 24, Block 6. <br />K. The right -of -way of the east /west townhome street be extended to <br />the eastern border of the subject site. <br />L. Consideration is given to relocating the easternmost access to the <br />4.8 -acre park (from 79th Street) between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4. <br />M. Public street access is provided to the excepted lot lying north of <br />Outlot C. <br />N. The developer is responsible for the upgrade of 79th Street east of <br />the subject site. This issue should be subject to further comment by the <br />City Engineer. <br />Mr. Johnson inquired as to responsibility for a cone - shaped portion of land on the west <br />side of the project. Mr. Brixius was unable to provide the requested information, but <br />suggested that perhaps the lot lines should be extended making the property owners <br />responsible for that section. <br />Bruce Kerber, representing the developer, explained that the trail system was planned to <br />run all the way to 4th Avenue. Next to the pond, park benches are proposed. The open <br />area referred to previously is proposed for use as a "tot lot ". With the use of a detailed <br />map, Mr. Kerber explained revisions to the original plan, addressing previous issues. <br />Mr. Kerber indicated that the home located at 686 Main Street cannot be rearranged in <br />accordance with the balance of the properties. Additionally, he stated that he would rather <br />Outlot A remain an outlot, as it may be needed at some point for a utility easement. Mr. <br />Kerber mentioned the limitation of not being able to go beyond the area designated for this <br />phase into that designated for Phase 3. <br />With respect to the triangular lots, Mr. Kerber indicated that there are no plans to <br />reconfigure those areas at this time. <br />Chair Schaps asked if the 79th Street road upgrade would extend to Highway 23. Mr. <br />Ahrens responded in the affirmative. <br />Mr. Johnson asked what the Comprehensive Plan suggests for the area between the <br />townhomes and Highway 23. Ms. Wyland explained that the existing Plan designates that <br />area as residential. Mr. Johnson expressed the opinion that the townhomes would present <br />a good case for medium - density residential in that segment, if not commercial along <br />Highway 23; but that single- family residential would be inappropriate. Ms. Wyland <br />indicated that careful consideration would be given to these issues. <br />Ms. Wyland asked for clarification as to the proposed trail. Mr. Kerber responded that at <br />present the trail is designed to stop short of Main Street with use of an easement until the <br />development progresses into the next phase. Mr. Brixius stated that this plat cannot show <br />