Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING <br />June 14, 1989 <br />Greg Kopiski addressed City Engineer's, Ron Stahlberg's <br />comments. #7 states: Lot 1, Block 1 does not meet current <br />design standards for R -1X Zoning, however it is adjacent to <br />existing Lot 1 of Lakes Addition No. 3 on Crystal Court, <br />which has previously been reviewed and accepted by the Lino <br />Lakes City Council. <br />Mr. Kopiski stated that this lot meets the standards of a R -1 <br />zoning, the lot right below Lot 1 Block 1 is R -1 and the <br />board felt that this would be allowable. <br />#8 of Mr. Stahlberg's letter states: Lot 20, Block 2 does <br />not meet current design standards after the area shown as a <br />drainage easement is subtracted from the total lot area. <br />The board felt that the applicant has increased storm water <br />storage in this area, and the applicant will allow special <br />considerations in the design of the home on this lot. The <br />board felt that this was also allowable. <br />Discussion turned to the fact that this is a long cul -de -sac, <br />and there are no plans for another access from the north into <br />this development. The board decided to go ahead with <br />approval of the plat, and address the issue of an additional <br />entrance at a later date. <br />After considerable discussion a motion was made. <br />MOTION: Mr. Chase moved to recommend to City Council <br />approval of Reshanau Park Estates, Application #89 -15 to <br />include TKDA's comments listed below with exception of #7 <br />because there is a hardship with this lot, and #8 because the <br />lot does allow enough area above the high water mark. This <br />plat is pending park board review, and #10 of TKDA's letter <br />should be addressed at the park board. <br />TKDA comments are as follows: <br />1. The existing parcels known as Outlot A and Outlot B <br />from Lakes Addition No. 3 should be labeled as such <br />underneath the proposed Lots 1 -3 of Block 1 and <br />Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2. <br />2. The existing homes on Blackduck Drive, within 100' <br />of the proposed plat, should be shown. <br />3. The right -of -way width for Black Duck Drive should <br />be delineated. The minimum right -of -way width for <br />a local street is 60 feet. The cul -de -sac radius <br />should also be delineated (60 feet). <br />4. The drainage and utility easement between Lots 7 <br />and 8, Block 1 should be shown as 20 feet. This <br />easement will allow for construction and <br />