04/10/1985 P&Z Agenda & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Two Consideration of the Audrey Burque request is continued from previous meetings. The accesss plan presented by Mr. Johnson outlined an east/ west collector street and a north /south collector street through this section in the southeastern quadrant of the City. The concensus and recommendation of the Board was that the east/ west collector be 80' wide and the north /south collector street be 60' wide. Mr. Prokop voiced his objection to the fact that the Park Board has not decided to take land in this area of the City for future park property. He feels that this area is physically cut off from the rest of the City by 35E and the residents will not have access to City park facilities. The representative for the Audrey Burque application voiced the fact that the $160 per unit park dedication fee was accept- able to his client. Mr. Kluegel stated that he was satisfied with the plat with regard to minimum sizes, frontages, etc. Mr. Prokop made a motion to recommend to Council that the petition by Audrey Burque, 1709 Main Street, Centerville, to subdivide by metes and bounds a parcel of land as described in the application by said individual be accepted as presented with the following stipulations: 1) (Note: This first stipulation of the motion was very un- clear. The following is Mr. Zack Johnson's interpretation of the road easements.) A 60' road easement, 30' on either side of the east boundaries of Lots H, I and J, extending from 64th St. north to the south boundary of parcel G, and then continuing in a northeasterly curve to an intersection of an 80' east /west collector street as described by the planner. 2) All particulars of the Lino Lakes Building Code, particu- larly Subdivision 35 be complied with, dealing with such things as future platting, etc. 3) For park land purposes, cash in lieu of land be accepted, however, recognizing that it may be necessary in the future with the development of the area and the area of tracts to the east, that land may have to be acquired to satisfy future park concerns. Motion was seconded by Mr. Cody and carried unanimously. Mr. McLean asked Mr. Johnson to graph for clarification this subdivision and the following subdivision for Paul Tubbs for the Council's convenience when they consider the two subdivi- sions. Mr. Doocy asked Mr. Johnson if he had a clear understanding of the road easement portion of Mr. Prokop's motion, since there was so much confusion and editorial changes taking place. Mr. Johnson assured the Board that he did. 105