04/10/1985 P&Z Agenda & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Four Mr. Zelinka suggested that restrictions on portable signs address such things as setbacks, size and anchoring to make the signs comply with windload standards. He also felt that those businesses within the community which are now being affected by the sign ordinance as it relates to portable signs, should have been notified as part of the public hearing procedure when the sign ordinance was recently changed. A representative from the 49 Club said that he has permanently anchored his sign in cement and does not feel that he should have to remove it. The Board discussed the option of permanently anchoring the changeable signs as this person has done. It was the concensus of the Board that if a sign is permanently anchored, then it is no longer portable and is subject to the regulations of a permanent sign within the ordinance. Milt Jorgensen appeared saying that he, too, had anchored his changeable sign and the Board told him to check with the Build- ing Official as to what type of anchoring is acceptable. In summary, the Board reminded the audience that if they wish to permanently anchor their portable, changeable sign, they are still allowed to have only two signs for their business- - one on the building front and one ground sign. Permanently anchored signs are subject to a permit and a fee as has been the case for several years. Any questions with regard to any signs are to be referred to the Building Official. Mr. McLean stated that he felt that the Board had dealt with the issue of portable signs this evening, as directed by the City Council; and that the P & Z made their recommendations to the Council with regard to the sign ordinance and that the Council has the option of accepting or rejecting the P & Z's recommendation. Mr. Doocy asked what work has been done per the P & Z's request at their last meeting, as outlined in paragraph 3 under "Sign Ordinance - Amendment ", page four of March 13, 1985 minutes. Mr. Kluegel and Mr. Johnson stated that nothing has been done. The concensus of the Board was that any further review as had been discussed at the last meeting, need not take place- -the sign ordinance has been subjected to enough review. The Board took a recess at this time. BRUCE HANSON - SURFSIDE - AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW The specifics of Mr. Hanson's request were discussed resulting in the following motion. Mr. Cody moved to recommend to the City Council that the appli- cation of Bruce R. Hanson, 6980 Lake Drive, the owner of 107