10/08/1986 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Page 3 October 8, 1986 MOTION: Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council approval of the application #86 -29 from Ed Vaughn, dated 9/24/86 for a minor subdivision because it appears to comply with the transportation plan, park plan and housing plan for the City and meet the zoning ordinance requirements. Mrs. Klaus seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Mr. Kluegel is to inform the applicant that the Park Board will need to review the application and that final approval will have to come from the City Council. SCHWAN'S - MINOR SUBDIVISION & SITE AND BUILDING PLAN The Board reviewed the request for a minor subdivision. There was concern with regard to access to the proposed "Parcel B" in case of future sale of the property. The Board recommended that the applicant make arrangements by way of easements, etc. to protect future owner's access to the property. MOTION: Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council approval of the minor subdivision of Schwan's Sales ( #86 -29), dated 9/24/86, located in the GB zone to be used as a wholesale distributor and warehousing business because it appears to be consistent with the land use plan, transportation plan and sewer plan of the City and also appears to meet the zoning ordinance with regard to lot size and lot width. Mrs. Klaus seconded the motion which carried unanimously. The applicant handed out a revised site and building plan to the Board. In reviewing the plan, several questions arose as a result of confusion in interpreting the plan. The Board felt that the plan submitted was difficult to read and understand and the Board requested that a new submittal be made which could be more clearly understood. MOTION: Mr. Cody moved to table consideration of the request by Schwan's Sales ( #86 -31) dated 9/24/86 for a site and building plan on the basis that the applicant provide the following: 1) a site plan for location of the proposed buildings including landscape design to be done by a landscape professional; 2) the questions regarding septic system raised by the TKDA 10/2/86 memo be addressed; 3) the questions regarding green area, parking space dimensions, driveway width, screening, lighting, curbing, loading area, drainage, etc. raised by R. L. Wuornos & Associates on thier 10/2/86 memo be addressed; 4) a traffic flow pattern and indication that the narrow 32 foot strip of Parcel B be blocked as to not allow an access in that area. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion which carried unanimously.