My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/08/1986 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1986
>
10/08/1986 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 2:11:43 PM
Creation date
7/18/2014 11:42:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
10/08/1986
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD <br />Page 5 October 8, 1986 <br />After discussion, the Board felt that this may be too <br />restrictive, particularly in the rural zones, and that <br />it still may not solve the problem the Building <br />Official has experienced with complaints of <br />semi- trailers parked in open areas. <br />The Board suggested that this issue be resolved by <br />expanding Section 901.03(18) (the nuisance ordinance) <br />to address the potential problem. Mr. Kluegel was <br />asked to handle the issue in this manner and present an <br />proposed amendment to the P & Z Board. <br />C. Sign Ordinance - This item was tabled since it is still <br />being reviewed by the City Attorney. <br />D. Car Washes - Proposed Amendment ( #06 -86) <br />MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to approve the proposed <br />ordinance #06 -86 which permits car washes only in <br />city - sewered GB areas, based on the opinion of Roger <br />Machmeier, Extension Agricultural Engineer from the <br />University of Minnesota in his letter of 9/16/86. Mr. <br />Cody seconded the motion which carried unanimously. <br />COMMENT: Mrs. Klaus felt that in light of the fact <br />that a car wash facility has been found to be <br />appropriate only in city - sewered areas, that the City <br />Council also strongly consider permitting other similar <br />types of businesses only in city - sewered areas because <br />of their potential for contaminating groundwater. <br />Other members of the Board agreed with this suggestion. <br />E. Glare Ordinance - As requested at the 9/10/86 meeting, <br />Mr. Kluegel presented a proposed amendment to the <br />nuisance ordinance addressing the problem of glare from <br />lighting. Mr. Prokop submitted yet another revision to <br />change the amendment to read as follows: <br />Section 901.03(19) - "In all zones, any sign or light <br />whose glare or intensity is of such a nature that it <br />impedes or interferes with the use of adjacent <br />properties or interferes with the flow of pedestrian or <br />vehicular traffic, it is considered a nuisance and will <br />not be permitted." <br />MOTION: Mrs. Klaus moved to table the glare ordinance <br />issue until the above proposal can be typed, presented <br />and considered by the P & Z Board. Mr. Cody seconded <br />the motion which carried unanimously. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.