Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />August 10, 1983 <br />Page Three <br />He explained the operation and use of this tower and noted that this <br />will contain equipment only. <br />The request is for a small building to contain the equipment and a 150' <br />free standing pole. It was emphaized that this transmission will not <br />interfere with any other type of equipment. The immediate area will be <br />fenced and the grounds will be according to the requirement of this <br />Board. <br />There was concern with the 20' access easement - Mr. Kluegel felt there <br />was no problem with this. It was pointed out this is just a driveway <br />for a maintainance man who would probably only be in the area 2 or 3 <br />times a year. <br />This facility will not be expanded -nor can any other commercial firm <br />use this facility for transmission. <br />Mr. Goldade moved to recommend to the Council the approval of the <br />application for Transmission tower for a Conditional Use Permit for <br />Nothwest Amps at the site 2209 Phelps Road on the Acton property for <br />the reasons that it is in an industrial site and conforms with the land <br />usage of the area. Seconded by Mr. Cody. <br />Mr.Goldade requested that the driveway be of crushed limestone. this <br />stipulations was accepted by Mr. Cody. Motion carried unanimously. <br />41, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT - Mr.Jab'h Stine <br />• <br />Mr. John Stine of the DNR was here to discuss the Shoreline Management <br />Ordinance. This is a draft ordinance and has beenpresented to the P &Z <br />for their discussion. Mr. Stine presented the background on this require- <br />ment and the reasons why. <br />Mr. Stine discussed the requirements set forth in this ordinance for <br />the development of shoreline properties. He noted there are 15 potential <br />areas in conjunction with lakes and 14 areas classified as basins that <br />would be affected by this ordinance. <br />Mr. Stine pointed out that, in order for this ordinance to be approved <br />by the DNR, the City must change the lot size requirements from 11,250 <br />square feet to 20,000 square feet for J-et shore lots. <br />There was discussion on the 20,000 square foot requirement. Mr. Stine <br />offered the alternative of computing the available lots, if there was <br />no public lands and the number of lots with the public lands deleted. <br />Mr. Doocy moved to recommend approval os this Shoreland Management <br />Ordinance with the exception of the numbers on page 6 regarding water <br />front lots, changing the numbers presented in the Natural Enviornment <br />waters from 11,250 to 20,000 and the recreational development waters <br />from 11,250 to 20,000. No.3- Zoning Provision; No.1- single family detached <br />No B - sewered areas. Seconded by Mr. Goldade. <br />Mr. Stine pointed out there are some changes in a letter dated July 12, <br />1983. Mr. Doocy included those changes in his recommendation„ <br />