My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/11/1983 P&Z Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Minutes
>
1983
>
05/11/1983 P&Z Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 1:36:59 PM
Creation date
7/21/2014 11:22:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
05/11/1983
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning and Zoning Board <br />May 11, 1983 <br />Page -3- <br />Mrs. Klaus asked if this was mainly to offer access to the lake? Will there <br />be docks? Mr. Bruggeman said possibly. <br />Mr. McLean felt there would be a problem with accumulating a lot of material <br />on this property and there would be a traffic problem. He also felt that <br />if the landowner wanted he could sell his lake lot to someone living outside <br />of Lino Lakes. Mr. Bruggeman said he would combine titles of the house lot <br />with the lake lot so this could not be done. <br />Mr. Prokop felt the land was very low and marshy and was under the impress- <br />ion that the area was designated by the Department of Natural Resources as <br />a northern pike spawning area. Mr. Bruggeman said it was a spawning area. <br />Mr. McLean said his personal feelings are that there is a safety problem <br />with this proposal and common docking would be more feasible. <br />Mr. Prokop noted that this area is designated as Rural (10 acre minimum) <br />in the proposed zoning ordinance. This subdivision would not be consistent <br />with this ordinance or the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mr. McLean noted this item does not need Planning and Zoning Board action <br />and it is the feeling of the Board that this is not a feasible plan. <br />ler here were several residents from West Oaks in the audience and they voiced <br />opposition to Mr. Bruggeman's proposal. <br />PROPOSED ORDINANCE - LIMIT TIME ON BUILDING PERMITS <br />Mr. Kluegel explained that at the last Planning and Zoning Board meeting <br />the Board had asked him to come to them with a suggestion on a proposed <br />ordinance for setting time limits on building permits. <br />Mr. Kluegel explained the City is currently following the state building <br />code but a stricter ordinance can be adopted by the City setting time limits. <br />The problem of temporary occupancy permits was discussed. Mr. Kluegel <br />explained he can issue a temporary occupancy permit when the safety and <br />health situations in a building are met. <br />Mr. McLean asked if it would be possible to put a time limit on a temporary <br />occupancy permit? <br />Mr. Goldade said he favored some sort of time limit, however, he felt people <br />who build their own houses need every encouragement. <br />Mr. McLean felt the phrase "good and satisfactory reason" for extending the <br />time limit for a temporary occupancy permit was too liberal. He felt City <br />Attorney, Hawkins could add tighter language to this passage. <br />IIIThe proposed zoning ordinance was consulted and there was a definition of <br />"Temporary Occupancy" in this ordinance. Mr. McLean suggested maybe the <br />temporary occupancy portion should be eliminated from the proposed zoning <br />ordinance. Mr. Prokop asked how then would you take care of a "hardship <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.