Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning and Zoning Board <br />April 13, 1983 <br />Page 4- <br />Mr. Goldade asked that Mr. Hanson be supplied with a list of requirements to be met before <br />he returns to the Commission for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit. <br />Mr. Ostlie asked the reason for extending the runway? Is it to allow larger air planes to <br />land? Mr. Hanson said the state requirement is 2,000 feet for a runway and it is for safety <br />reasons. (He did not say anything about landing larger air planes.) <br />Mr. Schumacher asked that Mr. Hanson give the Commission a copy of the Metropolitan Airport <br />Commission approval. <br />A five minute recess was called at 9:00 P.M. <br />DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL - RICE LAKE ESTATES - DONALD SPAGENSKI <br />Mr. Zack Johnson, a planning consultant, appeared for Mr. Spagenski who was also in the <br />audience. He explained that they wish to present the concept at this time, not asking for <br />plat approval or zone change approval, but asking for feelings and comments about this de- <br />velopment proposal before they go into more detail engineering and bring back a preliminary <br />plat. <br />Mr. Johnson explained the analysis process regarding the land and how the proposal was de- <br />loped. He had larger more detailed maps with him for his presentation and explained the <br />ation of the Park Land on the east, Hodgson Road on the north, the City of Circle Pines <br />on the south and the proposed commercial development on the west. <br />He explained they wished to avoid major cut or fill operations on the land, leave it as <br />natural as possible. He further explained the area is proposed for multiple family on the <br />proposed zoning map. Also the severelimitation of the site due to steep slopes and wet lands <br />were addressed. Trees and vegitation are proposed to be distrubed as little as possible. <br />The proposal is for about 120 to 130 homesites on 432 acres. About 10+ acres are undevelop- <br />able, 6+ acres are to be right -of -ways, 1 acre for a convenience commercial site. There <br />would be 25 - 26 acres left for single family development, an average lot size of 9,400 <br />sq. ft, smallest lot size, 7,800 sq. ft. Approximately 30% of the developable site will <br />be 7,800 sq. ft. lot sizes. <br />This will be all single family, corner occupied homes in the price range of high $40,000 to <br />law $50,000. <br />Mr. McLean pointed out the proposed ordinance requires a minimum of 9,000 sq. ft. lot sizes. <br />Mr. Johnson said he is asking that the Board consider variation of lot sizes to better re- <br />tain the natural amenities of the land but keeping the total site to an average of 9,400 <br />sq. ft. <br />Mr. Johnson explained these lots will have municipal sewer and water. The smallest house <br />will have a minimum width of 24feet and minimum sq. ft. of 1,050. Some lots will be at a <br />ttle higher quality and will have higher quality homes placed on them. <br />' <br />0 <br />r. McLean and Mr. Prokop felt they wished to adhere to the 9,000 minimum sq. ft. lot size and <br />70' front footage size required by the ordinance. <br />