11/18/1981 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning and Zoning Board November 18, 1981 Page Two. 0 Mr. Schumacher pointed out that the City cannot be responsible for the selling of lots in this City. Mr. Doocy asked if the memo of August 21st is made available to all applicants for variance and Mr. Schumacher said he did not know. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that when this matter had been brought before the Council, this variance procedure had been adopted because they had felt this would be the most efficient manner in which this could be handled. Mr. Doocy noted the items that should be complied with - the 6 listed on the back of the application - and to keep in close contact with the Building Inspector. When the items have been completed, contact the office and he will be put on the agenda. Mr. Prokop asked for a contour map showing the elevation and Mr. Olson asked where he would get something like that? It was generally felt this could be had from the City Engineer. MR. Olson asked if he had to get a survey of the lot and Mr. Prokop said, not necessairly. Mr. Schumacher said a site plan is what is needed showing the location of the home and all the utilities. Mr. Prokop moved to table Mr. Olson's application for a variance until such time as he meets the stipulations in the Building Inspectior of August 21, 1981, also meets the requirements set forth at this meeting. MR. Doocy added, the recommendations of the Engineer and the Planner and the high water IIIlevel. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Prokop suggested that the owners of the lots on West Shadow Lake Drive be sent the letter of August 21, 1981 informing them of the requirements for construction. Mr. Prokop made this into a motion. Mr. Johnson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Olson said having people appearing before the Board unprepared, taking up time - he felt they should be better informed. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that all the information necessary for the application of the variance is printed on the back of the application. Mr. Zadutke was not present. Mr. Schumacher said this person was here and talked with him briefly noting the items he would need. There was no back up information for this request. Mr.Prokop asked if this would be a move in the right direction to allow the making two lots out of three? There were several items missing before this request can be considered. Mr. Prokop moved to table this matter and advise Mr. Zadutke provide the necessary itmes. Seconded by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried unanimously. There was discussion on the problems of contamination of the lake with the development of the lots along West Shadow Lake Drive. The Board was con- cerned with how these lots could be developed without endangering the lake. It was generally felt that many of these concerns will fall on the building inspector.