05/21/1980 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

May 21, 1980 Planning and Zoning Board - Page Two - Mr. Reinert suggested that Mr. Kluegel inspect this prrpperty, talk to Mr. cher - work with Mr. Nelson, the adjoining property owner and the builder present this to the Planning and Zoning Board in a positive manner. Mr. okop so moved to table for this action. Seconded by Mr. Heath. Mr. Heath also said he did not think a variance would solve this problem. Mr. Doocy asked that Mr. Kluegel also make some measurements for determining the location of the existing structures. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Bennett Hildestad was the next on the agenda. He was not present. This was moved to table by Mr.Doocy, seoconded by Mr. Heath. Motion carried. Mr. Kock's application for a varaince to transfer a 5' foot strip of land in order to maintain the side yard set back for an addition on their garage. This All papers are in order. Mr. Heath moved to recommend approval of this. Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schultz had requested a variance for along driveway in order to construct him home due to the existence of a drainage easement on the front of the lot. Mr. Heath moved to recommend approval of this variance. Seconded by Mrs. Schwankl. Motion carried unanimously. The Richard Carlson lot split was considered next. This land is located on the corner of Hodgson Road and Linda Street. Mr. Carlson owns two lots and this split would leave one -half of each lot in a new parcel. Mr. Prokop moved to recommend approval of this request with the stipulation the existing build- ings meet all City requirements as to setbacks. This would split Lots 1 & 2 into two lots, one being the E4 of Lots 1 & 2, the other being the W4 of Lots •& 2. Seconded by Mr. Heath. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Robert Smeed appeared before the Board for a variance to have horses on a parcel of land of approximately 3 acres. Mr. Smeed presented a petition signed by persons on Ware Road and he also has a letter from his neighbors stating that he has accessto their property for keeping the horse. This would be a total of approximately 5.5 acres. Mr. Smeed presented signed leases. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that the fence that has been constructed is on the right -of -way and must be moved. Mr. Smeed has been informed of this by the building inspector. There was discussion on the possibility of these leases being withdrawn - what happens to this variance at that point of time. Mr. Heath moved to recommend approval of this variance with the condition that no more than two horses be kept on this property. Seconded by Mr. Johnson (arrived at 8:35 P.M.). Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Roy Stanley was present to present Sunset Oaks II. This land is proposed for industrial use and Mr. Stanley wants to develop as residential, Mr. Stanley felt that there is no way this parcel of land will be developed into industrial. He felt this should be developed as resendential. Mr. Schumacher read the letter from Mr. Short setting forth the reasons this land should remain as industrial in the Comprehensive Land Plan. The matter sewer bening in that area by 1990 and the availability of I35W was cited. so, The amount of buildable industrial land remaining in the City. Mr. Short recommended this area remain in the Industrial zoning as designated in Comprehensive Plan.