My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/01/1999 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
1999 Park Board Packets
>
11/01/1999 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 2:33:54 PM
Creation date
7/24/2014 12:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
11/01/1999
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 9, 1999 <br />residents in the past. <br />Council Members will determine the sale price of the lot based on the response to the <br />questions just listed. <br />This matter will be on the June 23rd work session agenda. <br />RESHANAU TRAIL DISCUSSION, RICK DEGARDNER <br />This matter was discussed at a joint City Council and Reshanau Lake Homeowners <br />Association meeting on March 2, 1999. Since that time, flyers were sent to the entire area <br />asking for comments regarding the current location of the trail around the north end of <br />Reshanau Lake and the proposed Mallard Lane trail. About 60% of those responding to <br />the flyer indicated that they would be supportive of the Mallard Lane trail and not <br />supportive of the condemnation of an easement for the current trail. Letters were also <br />received from residents outside of this neighborhood. <br />Condemnation of an easement could cost well over $100,000 . t d Lane trail <br />will cost about $52,000 if a matching grant is obtained. Th- 1 :. • all is <br />expensive because a boardwalk would be needed to lesse h: z p.• • the wetlands. If <br />the City is ready to construct the Mallard Lane trail e ° that the County is <br />ready for their trail construction projects, the bi trail construction with the <br />County. That would result in a 10% - 20% sa : 3 gs f • he ity. The County is expected to <br />start their trail construction program to - •ring. <br />Mr. Palcher, one of the prope <br />actually located on his pro <br />with Mr. DeGardner an <br />Palcher felt the lo <br />direct all traffic to <br />s ace' t to the current trail, noted that the trail is <br />so o his neighbor's property. He has been working <br />operative in working out an alternate plan. Mr. <br />handle this matter is to construct the Mallard Lane trail and <br />1 when it is completed. <br />Mr. Palcher was toldRhat some people would continue to use the current trail. Mr. Palcher <br />would object if large numbers of people keep using the current trail. <br />Funding for the Mallard Lane trail is still unresolved. The City has applied for a matching <br />grant, which means that the City still must fund approximately $52,000 for construction <br />costs. The City will know if the grant has been award within the next 30 days. At this <br />time, Council has not determined the use of the $27,444 unreserved fund balance. This <br />money could be used to fund a portion of the City costs. <br />Planing and Zoning Board members Mr. Jamie Schaps and Ms. Donna Carlson entered <br />this meeting. Mayor Sullivan explained the discussion this evening. <br />Council Member Bergeson noted the need to purchase a $35,000 generator for the Fire <br />District. He was not sure the Council could designate the $27,444 unreserved fund <br />PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.