My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
04/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 3:52:25 PM
Creation date
7/30/2014 11:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1...,Favorable on initial look at expansionlsee comments above, <br />IPFINAL VOTE COUNT: <br />Board Member Yes No <br />6 <br />• <br />FINAL VOTE DATE: <br />January 31, 2001 <br />Formal Application made Planned Development Overlay <br />Maps and Drawings included in Packet <br />• Open Space issue on Development sketch is indicated in gray. Mr. <br />Goertz has indicated that he is open to a conservation easement with <br />native plant buffers and signage. <br />Landscape Plan indicates boulevard and landscape around the town homes. <br />• Wetland delineation Completed <br />• Natural Resources Lake /Shore Land Overlay District. <br />• Trees on site <br />• Future Commercial expansion area to south indicated. <br />• Ordinary High Water elevation 883.1 <br />▪ Wetland mitigation needed <br />• Infiltration basins indicated <br />• Implied Trail through a proposed greenway area(1992 -2001) <br />STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: <br />1 Good idea to ask for a conservation easement with signage in the area <br />directly east and west of the lake. Signage should be posted along <br />edge reminding 1 no mow /disturb) For this to work, there needs to be <br />covenants restricting use and providing for a management agency. A <br />minimum association fee should be set aside for management of this <br />area. A management plan should be developed. The management agency <br />should be the local environmental review board. <br />1 A Tree preservation plan has been submitted. A site visit and a bit <br />more detail may be needed. <br />1 .Shoreland Overlay district means that on a sewered lot, building <br />setback must be 150 feet from the ordinary high water level. This <br />needs to be verified. <br />• City Engineering has shown concern for the house pad elevations. Soil <br />may need to be imported to raise the pad elevations. Mr. Goerts has <br />indicated to me that they will need to fill only on two lots if a lift <br />pump can be installed near NE cul de sac <br />1 ... The trail proposal through the planned greenway area (conservation <br />easement area) may have physical barriers at the area circled in red on <br />• the enclosed GIS map. The county has indicated that they have abandoned <br />this idea. <br />▪ Ilnfiltration areas are indicated on the North end, and a 1 Treed) <br />swale overflow on the south central side will be preserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.