My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:09:56 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 11:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
09/26/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 18, 2001 <br />Grochala stated the wetland adjacent to the property was about seven times the size of the <br />plat, and asked if there was a connection for the animals to go. Chair Lanyon answered that <br />initially there could be an increase in the population, but ultimately they would die. <br />Grundhofer expressed concern that the temperature change as a result of the runoff could <br />cause problems for the frog and dragonfly eggs. Asleson stated that it would be difficult to <br />measure, but the shading in the parking lot would help cool the runoff. <br />Grochala suggested that it might bounce in the outlet. Asleson answered that the effects <br />were unknown. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that it would be worth it to monitor the outflow temperatures. <br />Grochala concurred that a case study could be done. <br />Asleson stated he took surface temperature readings on two occasions at George Watch <br />Lake and Marshan Lake. He found that the water temperatures did not fluctuate much in <br />George Watch Lake because the lake was so shallow it would never stratify. Chair Lanyon <br />concurred adding that freshwater systems were adapted to sudden changes; He continued <br />that most of the water would go through the infiltration ponds <br />O'Connell noted the area was zoned for intense commercial development. Grochala <br />responded that it was technically zoned a shopping center:, <br />Wessel pointed out that it was the only site in the City chosen for a shopping center. <br />Previously, there had been at least twelve plans, but no one was interested. <br />Chair Lanyon mentioned on p. 6 at the top there was another example of similar language, <br />and asked Grochala to work on the language for runoff and use it throughout the document. <br />O'Connell expressed concern over#he reference on p. 7 discussing filling the wetland. <br />Grundhofer asked about studies for restorati[ <br />urestorations on site Asleson responded that nothing <br />significant was planned on site:. <br />O'Connell inquired-about the City's response. Grochala indicated that they needed to be <br />consistent with the Master Plan, which called for an equal amount of public park as to <br />mitigation. He added that Anoka County was in support of it. <br />Wessel stated that there'was an agreement in effect where adjacent land could be accepted <br />for the park The City had difficulty giving up land for Anoka County. <br />Kukonen noted that a maintenance plan would go through the County. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.