My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/28/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
08/28/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 11:03:52 AM
Creation date
8/1/2014 10:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
08/28/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 31, 2002 <br />Mr. Udhe stated that the lots cost 30,000 dollars each. He also had to work with <br />the airport. There was an ongoing issue of people wandering onto the runways. <br />He anticipated that they would be asked to put up a fence. <br />Grundhofer asked about the two dotted lines that went across the plan. Mr. <br />Johnson answered that it was the maximum building height of 25 feet and would <br />accommodate a two story building required by the airport. <br />Vice Chair Schneider noted that there were no hangers proposed. Mr. Johnson <br />responded that there were 11 pads, and those lots would be reserved for people <br />would want pads with their lots. <br />Asleson inquired if there were any special conce <br />Mr. Johnson answered that it would be a t <br />had met and exceeded the requirements. <br />would fully disclose. The hanger area wo <br />traffic over the pipeline. <br />a paved surface. They <br />with the design and <br />Grundhofer stated that Outlot B was a wetly <br />be addressed with the homeowner. Mr. J <br />conservation easement. <br />ted to know how it would <br />that it was under a <br />Asleson commented that the coup abash s o ghat the area was City land, <br />but it was probably an error. <br />Grundhofer asked for specifics etn the cons' ation easement, would it require <br />buffering or signage She was iuerned about people dumping yard waste in the <br />wetland. Mr. + + a were th `, e had the impression that signage was less <br />than succes <br />Asleso <br />calls coming <br />was not as mu <br />tined that the <br />ncause nei <br />e working under the present zoning laws. He had <br />s police the wetlands that had signage. There <br />the look of the signs. <br />Mr. Johnson stated tha. ditions 7, 8, and 9 needed to be developed. Some of <br />the things discussed to be preserved were in the 6th Addition. <br />Donlin noted that Mr. Udhe was very fair and forthcoming. She expressed <br />disappointment that the conservation planning was not ready for implementation. <br />The oaks needed to be addressed and the oak savanna needed to be preserved. <br />The width of the roads could be reduced, which would reduce the cost for the <br />developer. <br />Mr. Udhe indicated that he would save the trees, but the entire area was required <br />• to be graded according to the ordinances in effect. <br />6 Draft Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.