The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/03/2003 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting DECEMBER 3, 2003 6:30 P.M. This meeting is not televised. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Legacy Holdings /Legacy at Woods Edge /Planned Unit Development/Application Review B. Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Goals 7. OTHER DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Forestry B. Solid Waste Recycling /Recycling Day C. Environmental /Heron Issues 8. ADJOURN • Agenda Item 5A • Environmental Board Meeting Date: December 3, 2003 Topic: Background: Legacy Holdings /Legacy at Woods Edge Planned Unit Development Application Review The City of Lino Lakes and the Hartford Group applied on November 10, 2003 to seek approval for mixed -use development with residential and commercial buildings. A mandatory EAW was performed and reviewed by the Environmental Board on November 6' 2003. Included in this report are the following attachments: • • • Attachment Meeting on Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment Attachment • Attachment Attachment • 1, Corrections to the EAW following the Environmental Board November 6, 2003. 2, Preliminary Plat of "The Village ". 3, Boundary and Topographic and Tree Inventory. 4, Master Site Plan. 5, Master Grade Plan. 6, Plant Schedule. 7, Preliminary Senior Living Development Plan. 8, Preliminary Regent at Lino Lakes Senior Living Development. 9, Lino Lakes Planning, Legacy at Woods Edge. 10, Proposed Lighting Fixtures. The focus of this review is to obtain Environmental Board Comments on the submitted application information. No formal action is needed at this time Project Summary: In 1998 the City of Lino Lakes, following receipt of a grant from Metropolitan Council, hired California based Calthorpe and Associates to prepare a Mixed Use Master Plan for the Town Center Area. The master plan emphasized the following design objectives: The Legacy at Woods Edge Development plan emphasizes the following objectives: 1. A 65 -acre complex of buildings in a controlled setting. 2. An integrated mix of uses that respond to residents' needs. • 3. A gathering place that creates a sense of community, civic identity and pride. 4. A place that defines the unique character of the community. 5. An economic development initiative to increase the value of the commercial tax base. 6. A distinctive, consistent architectural style that promotes high quality, aesthetically pleasing commercial buildings. The plan is intended to provide all of the classic components of traditional neighborhoods- Civic, residential, commercial and recreational uses - within a human scale environment so that these uses interact as part of a greater plan rather than as separated destinations. The mix of uses is intended to implement the principles of the Livable Communities Act and the Cities Comprehensive Plan by creating a Town Center for the community and providing more diverse, life - cycle housing - including affordable and rental housing — within an active and interesting pedestrian- orientated community. The proposed project includes up to approximately 350,000 square feet of commercial development and 450 residential units. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The property is guided for mixed use development within the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Plan states that "the southeast quadrant of the 1 -35 W /Lake Drive interchange represents the Lino Lakes Village area. The village is intended to integrate a mixture of commercial, medium and high density residential and public uses in an attractive and cohesive design ". Environmental Assessment. Worksheet (EAW) An EAW was previoulsy prepared for the Village Project in 1998. A negative declaration was sited at that time. An updated EAW was recently reviewed by the Environmental Board and approved for distribution and public comment on November 10, by the City Council. The 30 -day review period for the new EAW started on November 24, 2003. No final action on the proposed development may occur until completion of the Environmental Review Process. Surface Water Management Runoff from the site currently drains to the south and east and ultimately discharges to Marshan Lake and George Watch Lake. Surface water concerns center around water quality and quantity issues • • The City's engineering consultant, SEH, Inc., is preparing the Master Surface Water Management Plan. The plan is being designed in accordance with National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and City of Lino Lakes, design standards. Storm water runoff will be treated through infiltration areas and retention ponds. The plan is proposing to utilize underground treatment chambers for infiltration purposes As with past projects, infiltration is a desirable practice if ground water pollution is mitigated by establishing at least 3 feet of sand separation between the bottom of the infiltration area and the seasonally high ground water table. This requirement can be met on the site. A P8 (phosphorous) analysis will be performed to demonstrate phosphorous loading reduction to George Watch Lake.. Best management practices for surface water quality should be initiated and integrated into the predicted phosphorous exports for the site. Best management practices should include periodic and timely sweepings to capture sediment laden phosphorous on impervious surfaces. A vacuum type sweeper is a better tool for removing phosphorous deposits on impervious surfaces. Best management practices should also include the elements sited in the plan for Market Place north of 35W. ttManagement/Housekeeping Practices/Target Sife These are used primarily in urban areas to keep impervious areas clean and are most effective when applied on a continuous basis either year round or seasonally depending on the nature of the problem. These controls are likely to reduce pollutants by 25 -50 %. Individual practices include: • Street Sweeping • Street Maintenance • Collection System Maintenance • Catch basin cleaning • Storm sewer flushing • Litter Control • Chemical Application reduction • Deicing materials • Pesticides and fertilizers • Safe Chemical storage improvement The entire area is in a Lino Lakes Environmental Handbook as a Lake Protection Area with the Tamarack swamp to the West a high priority protection area and buffer area to George Watch Lake. Treated water from the site will flow through a degraded tamarack swamp. There may be some opportunity in the future to restore this swamp in the future by working with Anoka County. The ditch that drains the swamp is North of the Village site. The ditch cuts through the basin • and appears to cut through an elevated rim that abuts the Lake. If the rim were to be restored to original grades, than the flood plane would be restored to original levels that supported the Tamarack swamp and some of the rare plant species one might find in this area. Common parking and underground parking reduces the required parking stalls substantially for Retail store and Service Establishments, and housing areas. Lighting Site lighting will need to constructed in accordance with requirements of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. All lighting must contain and 90 degree cutoff angle. The proposed street lighting fixtures are shown in Attachment 10. Rare and Endangered Species There are no rare or endangered species on the site. Tree Preservation A small area of oak woodlands on the SE side of the proposed development will be impacted. The entire area of woodlands on the SW side of the development will be impacted. There has been some discussion about moving some of the movable -size trees from this area into the new landscape. In all cases, city standards for tree preservation should be implemented. If trees are moved, than storage area needs to be designated until the planting areas are ready. (Usually tree removal happens before initial grading operations). Street/Landscaping The landscape /streetscape design is generic at this time. The city's engineering department is working on this. Staff suggestion is to add northern pin, Red and White /Burr oaks to the list of shade trees. There are also some disease resistant Elms now available that could be used. There is a very wide spectrum of annuals and perennials that could be added to the "Perennials" list for both the "Perennials" and Rain - gardens section of the Plant Schedule. The use of native cultivars adds more design flexibility. The shrub list could also be expanded to afford more flexibility to designing the roundabout and the park area. If the design intention of internal elements to the roundabout is to see through, than low plants should be used exclusively. If it the intention of the plan to not see through than taller shrubs and other materials should be added to the list. • All soils in planting areas should be protected from compaction. Sequencing and best management practices should address this. Regardless, the important issues are water availability, plant bed design, and maintenance. Irrigation should be available to all of the areas, even the raingarden areas. New plants in future redesign (even if they are native deep- rooted plants) need establishment water. All planting beds should be in a maintenance budget and schedule. Planting beds should be on a regular schedule for mulch maintenance. Native or raingarden areas should have a high degree of potted plants used in the initial planting. All tree areas should have water availability. If possible, CU Soils (structural soils should be incorporated into tree planting areas that have limited root space. CU Soils will enable longer lived, faster growing, and healthier trees in these areas. Planting baskets in the streetscape can be very nice, but again should have a drip irrigation line. These lines can be routed up lighting poles. Lighting the streetscape will most likely be desired. The use of lower intensity, directional accent lighting should be used. I think this can be designed so there is a minimum to no noticeable impact. The maintenance of all planting areas need to be incorporated into a well thought out common and master plan. This plan should be part of the BPM. BMP's should have a definitive and decisive implementation budget and schedule built into the project. Trails are an important part of this plan. All trails should be placed in a fashion that minimizes impacts to edge areas, at the same time instilling a high level of resource experience for users. For example, there is a blue joint wetland to the SE. The trail should stay off the edge , yet allow users to enjoy this feature, Environmental Board Comments: 1ijoiwrj • Revised 2/99 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Legacy At Woods Edge Development 2. Proposer: City of Lino Lakes and The Hartford Group 3. RGU: City of Lino Lakes Contact person: Patrick Sarver, The Hartford Group Contact person: Michael Grochala Title: Director of Land Planning Title: Comm. Development Director Address: 12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 112 Address: 600 Town Center Parkway City, state, ZIP: Eden Prairie, MN 55344 City, ZIP: Lino Lakes, 55014 Phone: 952.746.1210 Phone: 651.982 -2427 Fax: 952.746.1201 Fax: 651.982.2499 E -mail: psarver @hartfordgrp.com E -mail: mgrochala @ci.lino - lakes.mn.us 4. Reason for EAW preparation (check one) EIS scoping X Mandatory EAW Citizen petition RGU discretion Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number 4410.4300 and subpart name 32, Mixed residential and industrial - commercial projects. 5. Project location: County: Anoka City/Township: City of Lino Lakes NE 1/a Section: 17 Township: 31W Range: 22N Attach are copies of the following: • County map showing the general location of the `project; (Figure 1) • U.S. Geological Survey map indicating project boundaries; (Figure 2) • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features; (Figures 3 and 4) 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. The Legacy at Woods Edge Development is a proposed mixed -use development located in the southeast quadrant of the I -35W /Anoka County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 23 interchange, CSAH 23 is known as Lake Drive. The development will include 348,292 square feet of commercial/office, 450 multi - family residential units, and 38,000 square feet of civic uses (YMCA facility), on approximately 65 acres of land. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN Figure 1 General Location Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN Figure 2 USGS Topographical Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 3 Lino Lakes, MN Figure 3 Proposed Development Site Plan Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The proposed mixed -use development is intended to occupy approximately 65 acres of land located in the southeast quadrant of the interchange of I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH 23) in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (see Figures 1 and 2). Approximately 14.5 acres are already developed with the City Hall complex, Lino Lakes State Bank, and Fairview Medical Clinic. Project History In 1997 the City of Lino Lakes prepared a Master Plan for this area of the City. An EAW was completed and a Negative Declaration was issued in 1998 for the proposed development contained in the Master Plan. Construction of a portion of the original Master Plan development has been realized with the new government complex, containing the City Hall offices, police station, and an early childhood development center. In addition, two parcels along the westem boundary of the site that have been developed into the Lino Lakes State Bank and a Fairview Clinic. The undeveloped portions of the site are owned by the City of Lino Lakes and private parties. Hartford Group Inc. has acquired development rights from the site with the exception of a section of land that will be reserved for the proposed YMCA. A site development concept plan for the undeveloped portion of the site has been prepared. The proposed project includes the construction of up to 348,292 square feet of retail/office space, 38,000 square feet for a YMCA facility, and 450 multi- family residential units. Mixed Use Development Description The proposed site plan (see Figure 3) incorporates the above square footages and number of residential units into a series of buildings that have been located to minimize disruption to existing natural features such as wetlands and mature trees, as well as to maximize visibility and create a quality mixed -use development. The mixed -use development will inspire an energetic neighborhood and will provide a number of living, working, and service opportunities within the project area. The project includes an internal street network that provides access to the retail/office, residential, and civic buildings. Town Center Parkway will serve as a collector street, providing access to Lake Drive (Anoka County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 23) at the southwest comer of the site. The proposed local roadways will also provide corridors for public water, sanitary sewer, and other utilities necessary to serve the development. The clustering of structures has been employed in the proposed development for the purpose of preserving and enhancing sensitive land features on the site and for providing Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN parkland and open space. The proposed plan has the added benefit of avoiding wetland impacts on the site and of minimizing impacts to a grove of mature trees located along the eastern edge of the site. A proposed storm water treatment system will provide an efficient infiltration and retention system for storm water runoff from the site. Storm water ponds, vegetative grass filter strips, and infiltration cells will be utilized to retain and treat runoff from the site. These features will also provide aesthetic value and green space to the visually attractive integrated neighborhood. Initial site grading and construction is expected to begin in 2004. Full development of the Legacy at Woods Edge Development is expected to be completed in 2 to 3 years. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose is to provide all the classic components of traditional neighborhoods—civic, residential, commercial and recreational uses—within a human scale environment so that these uses interact as part of a greater plan rather than as separated destinations. The mix of uses is designed to implement the principles of the Livable Communities Act and the City's Comprehensive Plan by creating a Town Center for the community and providing more diverse, life -cycle housing — including affordable and rental housing — within an active and interesting pedestrian- oriented community. The development is a cooperative effort that will leverage public and private investment to create sustainable value, beth ecologically, economically and culturally. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? X Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. The proposed development is part of a Master Plan for the site that was completed by the City of Lino Lakes in 1997. An EAW for the Master Plan (also known as the Village Development) was prepared in December 1997 and a Negative Declaration on the need for an EIS was adopted in 1998. Since that time, a small portion of the Master Plan has been developed. The City Hall complex, which includes the City Hall offices, police station, and an early childhood development center, has been constructed in the southeastern. portion of the site. Furthermore, the Lino Lakes State Bank and Fairview Clinic have been constructed on the westerly edge of the site. The remaining portions of the Master Plan (residential and commercial/office development) have been modified for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development and therefore warrant additional environmental review due to the increase in residential units and in area of commercial/office space. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN • • 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage 65.3 Acres, approximately 14.5 acres have already been developed with the City Hall complex. Lino Lake State Bank, and Fairview Medical Clinic. Number of residential units: 0 unattached 450 attached Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): 348,292 total sq./ft. Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet): Manufacturing None Other industrial None Institutional 38,000 Agricultural None Office: 139,400 Retail: 208,892 Warehouse None Light industrial None Other commercial (specify): Building height ; If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings As indicated on Figure 3, buildings #2, #4, #5, #9, #11, #12, #13, and #14, are proposed to have up to three stories and buildings #6, #7 #10 #16, and #17 are proposed to have a maximum of four stories. The buildings are located throughout the site and are proposed to have commercial development on the first floor, while the upper floors would be utilized for residential units and/or office space. The existing buildings within the project area have structures that are typically 1 and 2 stories in height. Buildings 1 through 5 fall within the Marsh= Lake Shoreland District and will have heights less than 36 feet. 8. Permits and approvals required. List all known Local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of government Local City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes Anoka County Anoka County Rice Creek Watershed District Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Council State MPCA MPCA Type of application Status EAW Approval/Record of Decision Preliminary Plat Approval Rezoning/PUD Approval Final Plat Approval Site Plan Approval Building Permit(s) Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Work Within CSAH 23 R/W Final Plat Review Land Development Permit Approval Sanitary Sewer Extension Livable Communities Grant Sanitary Sewer Extension NPDES Construction Permit To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Determined) To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained I Awarded To Be Obtained To Be Obtained Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 7 Lino Lakes, MN MN Dept. of Health Watermain Extension To Be Obtained MN Dept. of Transportation Final Plat Review To Be Obtained 9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify . any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Existing Land Uses The southerly end of the site is developed with the Lino Lakes City Hall complex that includes the City Hall offices, police station, and an early childhood learning center. Two existing businesses are located along the west side of the site. The Lino Lakes State Bank and Fairview Clinic have frontage along Lake Drive (CSAH 23), but receive access on Village Drive, which is a backage road connected to Town Center Parkway. The northern portion of the site is currently occupied by Arctic Sandblasting Company and one single- family residence and is bound by I -35W on the north, the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park on the east and CSAH 23 on the west. This privately held business has been in operation since 1975. The commercial business consists of several structures, service roads, and includes a large semi- tractor trailer storage area. Access to the business is along a service road that intersects with Lake Drive north of Fairview Clinic in the vicinity of the I -35W access ramp. Both the business and existing single - family residence will be removed during construction. Adjacent Land Uses The southern property line for the proposed development is bordered by the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park and a small residential development consisting of seven single - family dwellings. The eastern property line is bordered by the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. Land uses on the west side of Lake Drive include an Amoco service station, limited residential development, and undeveloped property that is currently zoned for commercial development. The northern side of the project area is separated from existing commercial and industrial uses by I -35W. Compatibility The I -35W interchange area is designated in the City's Comprehensive Plan as the City's Town Center. Commercial land uses are proposed for all four quadrants of the freeway interchange. The project area is intended to serve as both a commercial and civic focal point of the community. Proposed land uses are consistent with existing and future uses in the area. The existing sandblasting business and single - family residence will be removed as part of the project development. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) has been conducted for the site. A copy of the Phase I ESA is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. The assessment identified three elements of concern that will be further evaluated at the time of construction, including the following: Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 8 Lino Lakes, MN • Two above - ground storage tanks; • A storage areas for cars and other vehicles; and • The site has been used as a sandblasting facility for over 25 years. According to the ESA, the site does not have a high potential for any environmental hazards, beta The assessment revealed no indications of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the site. 10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development. If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) developed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was used to complete an inventory of land cover types at the site. Figure 4 depicts the MLCCS cover types of the project area. The MLCCS inventory data was analyzed and synthesized. The cover types were placed in broader categories for comparing the pre- and post - development effects as depicted in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 5. Table 1 Land Cover Type Conversion Cover Type Before After Wetlands 6.5 6.5 Impervious Surfaces 22.7 30.0 Wooded/Forest 9.4 4.8 Urban/Suburban Landscaping 25.4 22.9 Other (ponding) 0 1.1 Total 65.3 653 Source: City of Lino Lakes, MNDNR, SEH, and Hartford Group. The Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resources Inventory Report, 1999, was also used to identify existing cover types. A copy of the report is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. 11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. Because the proposed ' development is in the vicinity of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, there is a variety of wildlife in the study area due to the largely undeveloped nature of the park and the diverse types of cover. The park contains some of the most significant native wildlife habitat in the metropolitan area. Marshan Lake is located in the park and is approximately 400 -feet south of the City Hall Complex. George Watch Lake is also located in the park and is approximately 500 -feet east of the site. Wetlands, woodlands, and grasslands provide habitat and cover for many common species found in the area. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 9 Lino Lakes, MN Figure 4 MLCCS Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 10 Lino Lakes, MN Figure 5 Post —Development Land Cover Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 11 Lino Lakes, MN The proposed development will incorporate several measures to minimize impacts on the park and associated fish and wildlife in the study area. Approximately 1.6 -acres of a grove of mature trees currently located on the eastern side of the site (adjacent to the park) will be maintained. The proposed development will include natural open space areas and vegetative buffers between the development and the park boundary. Furthermore, the development will include storm water treatment best management practices (e.g. detention ponds, infiltration cells, vegetated swales and filter strips) to minimize water quality impacts, because runoff from the site will ultimately run through the park and into George Watch Lake and Marshan Lake. The wetlands on the site and natural areas along the eastern boundary will be preserved and will continue to provide habitat for numerous waterfowl, amphibian, reptiles, and upland wildlife species. Two infiltration basins along the north side of Town Center Parkway that were constructed in anticipated of future development, but never utilized will be removed by the project. These basins will be replaced elsewhere on the project site. b. Are any state -listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? X Yes No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB 20031064. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. A search of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) Natural Heritage Database was recently requested to determine if rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the project area. The results of the database search show four known occurrences of rare species or animal aggregation sites in the search area. A Bald Eagle nesting site has been documented immediately east of the project site within the Wargo Nature Center, which is approximately 3/4-mile east of the proposed development. No Construction is proposed within close proximity of the nest. - _ . _ _ - - - • - = - - - - - - • . According to the response from the MNDNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, given the location of the project area and the presence of existing wetlands, a botanical survey of the project area was recommended. The Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report was completed in 1999. Additional biological field investigations were conducted on July 9, 2003 to determine if any occurrences of rare plant species are present on the site. The results of the biological field survey conclude that there were no rare plant populations encountered and that the proposed development will not directly impact any rare plant species. The MNDNR response letter and database search results, and documentation from the recent biological field survey are included in Appendix A. 12. Physical impacts on water resources. WM the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 12 Lino Lakes, MN impoundment — of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? Yes X No. If yes, identify water resource affected and give the MNDNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI: Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. Electronic National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping along with a Wetland Delineation Report for the Tagg Property, dated June 2003, were used to identify wetlands on the site. The proposed development will not require the alteration of any wetlands on the site. 13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? X Yes _No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and MNDNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), completed in May 2003, identified two water wells on the Arctic Sandblasting business site. One water well is associated with the house located on the southeastern portion of the site and the other well is located north of the sandblasting buildings. All wells located within the project area are proposed to be abandoned in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health standards as part of the project development.: A complete copy of the Phase I Report is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. The proposed development will be served by the existing municipal water supply and will not require installation of any wells. The installation of sanitary • sewer, storm sewer, and watermains may require isolated dewatering in order to install the underground utilities. It is unknown at this time the extent of dewatering that will be required. If substantial dewatering is required, the responsible party for the development will be required to obtain a permit from the MNDNR. Development of the site will require connection to the City of Lino Lakes water supply system. The municipal water system has a firm capacity of 5.135 million gallons per day. The current average daily water use for the City is estimated to be 1.0 million gallons per day. The proposed development is anticipated to have an average demand of 150,000 gallons per day. No additional water storage facilities are planned within or as a result of the project. 14. Water - related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 -year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? X Yes _No. If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 13 Lino Lakes, MN The City has adopted shoreland and floodplain ordinances that regulate development within these designated areas. The MNDNR has approved these ordinances. The eastern and southern portions of the site are located within the designated shoreland zoning districts for George Watch Lake and Marshan Lake, respectively (see Figure 6). The Shoreland District extends 1,000 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of public waters. The height of structures within the Shoreland Districts shall be limited to thirty -six feet. The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park boundary separates the project area from the OHWL of George Watch Lake and Marshan Lake by approximately 800 -feet and 250 -feet, respectively. Given the distance separation and forested nature of the regional park property, no visual impact to the public water bodies is anticipated. Additionally, there will be no disturbance of Shore Impact Zones. Both George Watch Lake and Marshan Lake are classified as Natural Environment Lakes. Impervious surface coverage of lots within the Shoreland District of a Natural Environment Lake cannot exceed 60% for commercial/industrial development and 35% for multi - family residential. The proposed impervious surface coverage within the Marshan Lake Shoreland District is classified as commercial development and has been calculated to be approximately 43% of the total area within the Shoreland District boundary. No impervious surfaces are proposed within the designated Shoreland District of George Watch Lake. Stormwater management will be handled in conformance with Rice Creek Watershed District and City of Lino Lakes requirements as discussed in Question No. 17 of this EAW. The proposed project does not lie within a delineated 100 -year flood plain. 15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? _Yes X No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: 39.2 acres; approximately 69,000 cubic yards. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. According to the preliminary grading estimates the site will require approximately 9,585 cubic yards of fill to implement the proposed site plan. Approximately 14.5 acres were previously disturbed when the City Hall complex, bank, and clinic were constructed. Cumulative Cut Volume Cumulative Fill Volume Net Difference 69,314 cubic yards 78,899 cubic yards 9,585 cubic yards Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN 14 Figure 6 Shoreland Zoning District Boundary Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN The proposed development site is characterized by gently rolling topography, but contains some areas of slopes approaching 12 %. The construction of local roads, utilities, and development may require extensive grading and landscape manipulation at specific locations within the site. Erosion will present a hazard in slope areas if soils are exposed and left bare during construction activities. Construction of the project will disturb more than 1 acre of land and therefore will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A likely requirement of the NPDES permit and a requirement of the Rice Creek Watershed District is that a storm water runoff and erosion control plan be prepared for the site. The proposed plan will include the collection and treatment of runoff through grass swales, temporary sediment basins, storm water detention ponds, silt fencing, and vegetative filter/buffer strips (utilizing existing vegetation or manufactured materials). These control and treatment techniques will be utilized throughout the site and will be appropriately located to protect wetlands located along the eastem side of the site. Furthermore, City policies and standards for controlling erosion and sedimentation will be required. These standards are consistent with the MPCA Best Management Practices for. Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas, the BWSR Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook, and the EPA Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP). Vegetative filter strips will be used around the eastern and southern boundary of the site to help control erosion. As stated in the Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development, filter/buffer strips provide an important function in minimizing erosion, reducing direct runoff of storm water into vulnerable ecological resources, and help sustain wildlife populations through suitable habitat. The City and the developer will coordinate efforts with the Rice Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and the City's Environmental Board to ensure erosion concerns are addressed. 17. Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any storm water pollution prevention plans. After additional impervious surface area is created by the construction of buildings and pavements, the rate and volume of surface water runoff will increase during storm events. Therefore, a surface water management plan for the development is being proposed that will retain storm water runoff on -site for the purpose of improving water quality and incorporate infiltration to reduce surface discharge and promote recharge of the groundwater. To comply with City and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements, the surface water management plan has incorporated rate control, which will ensure that there is a 0% post - development increase in runoff rates from the site. The development proposes to construct a drainage system within all the street improvements and parking areas to convey runoff to proposed ponding areas and infiltration cells (green space or underground storage chambers). Subsurface chamber technology takes advantage of the soil's inherent filtration and renovation capabilities to store and treat storm water runoff while providing the flexibility to plan for additional buildings and green space. To maximize pollutant removal efficiencies, the water quality control structures will be designed and constructed according to NURP, the City of Lino Lakes, and Rice Creek Watershed District standards. Appendix B contains Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 16 Lino Lakes, MN a water quality technical memorandum that outlines the ability of the site plan to provide adequate retention and infiltration of surface water runoff. Based on the water quality analysis, the proposed development has maintained adequate area for the retention (ponds) and infiltration (natural and underground chambers) of surface water runoff. Before construction can proceed, both the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District must issue permits to satisfy surface water management regulations. The project will eliminate two existing infiltration basins along the north side of Town Center Parkway. These basins will be replaced elsewhere on the site. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. Runoff from the site currently drains to the south and east and ultimately discharges to Marshan Lake and George Watch Lake. Following development of the proposed site, storm water will be treated through infiltration in open spaces or subsurface chamber technology and through retention ponds that will meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) guidelines, City of Lino Lakes policies /criteria, and Rice Creek Watershed District rules and regulations. Storm water rate control and treatment will occur prior to any storm water being discharged to receiving water bodies (See Figure 7). Therefore, water quality in the receiving waterbodies will not be adversely effected. Treated storm water will either be naturally infiltrated into the groundwater or will be discharged to existing wetland basins located on and/or adjacent to the site. Water from these wetlands eventually will enter George Watch Lake, Marshan Lake, and the remainder or the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes system. 18. Water quality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Normal domestic wastewater /sewage will be generated from the site. Some commercial developments may result in flows of waste associated with restaurants or other eatery type uses. Estimated sewer flows are based upon the wastewater flow rates of 100 gallons per day per person (residential) and 40 gallons per day per employee (commercial). The projected sewer flows will be approximately 120,000 gallons per day (average) or 470,000 gallons per day (peak). Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN 17 Figure 7 Storm Water Management Plan Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 18 Lino Lakes, MN b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. All wastewater will be discharged into the City's collection system, thereby avoiding any direct discharge to receiving waterbodies. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. The sanitary sewer flows generated by the proposed development will not exceed available reserve capacity of the City of Lino Lakes and Metropolitan Council's sanitary sewer system. Improvements that will be necessary include the extension of gravity sanitary sewer lines to serve the development. At the nearest downstream Met Council Environmental Services metering station (Station Number 211), located at North Road and Lakeview Drive, the average design flow is 1.16 million gallons per day (MGD) and the peak design flow is 3.6 MGD. The City is currently producing an average flow of 0.42 MGD (420,000 gallons /day). d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. Not applicable 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 2 feet minimum 15 -20 feet average; Approximate depth (in feet) to bedrock: 230 feet minimum 250 feet average. Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. There are no known geologic site hazards to groundwater within the study area or in close proximity to the proposed site. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 19 Lino Lakes, MN Based on information obtained from the Soil Survey of Anoka County, the following soil map units are contained within the project area and are shown on Figure 8. Map Symbol Cu Iw Se SoA ZmA ZmB ZmC Soil Map Name Cut & Fill Land Isanti Fine Sandy Loam, 0 -2% slope Seelyeville Muck Soderville Fine Sand, 0-4% slope Zimmerman Fine Sand, 0 -2% slope Zimmerman Fine Sand, 2 -6% slope Zimmerman Fine Sand, 6 -12% slope Drainage Class Variable Very Poorly Drained Very Poorly Drained Poorly. Drained Excessively Drained Excessively Drained Excessively Drained A Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was completed in May 2003. A complete copy of the report is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. The geotechnical explorations were primarily conducted on the northern portion of the site. On -site soil borings typically encountered approximately 6- inches of sandy topsoil over lacustrine deposited sands. However, several borings encountered sandy fill beneath the topsoil to depths of 4- to 9 -feet. Groundwater was observed in six borings at depths ranging from 15- to 20 -feet below the surface. The combination of excessively drained soils and a relatively high groundwater table creates a potential for groundwater contamination. The site will be connected to municipal sewer and water systems to eliminate two potential sources of contamination. At this time, the proposed use of the site does not involve the use or generation of hazardous chemicals. If chemicals are to be stored on -site, they will be stored either indoors or in self - contained facilities to eliminate the potential for spills and subsequent groundwater contamination. 20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge ' and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. There are no known hazardous wastes associated with the proposed development. Any demolition debris created by razing of existing structures during construction will be properly disposed of at an approved landfill. The City does not provide solid waste collection services for residents and businesses. Residents and businesses contract their solid waste removal needs with independent garbage haulers that are licensed by the City. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 20 Lino Lakes, MN Figure 8 Soils Map Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 21 Lino Lakes, MN The City has established a curbside recycling program. All commercial and residential haulers are required to offer recycling Typical recyclable materials include plastic bottles and certain other plastics, newspaper, glass, aluminum/metal cans, corrugated cardboard, household batteries, magazines, catalogs and other paper products. Some haulers accept used motor oil and automotive batteries in addition to the curbside recyclables. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. No toxic or hazardous materials are expected to be used or present as part of the commercial/office or residential developments. Some toxic materials may be sold through retail businesses and approved methods of handling, storage, and disposal of these materials will be required. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the site in May 2003. A complete copy of the Phase I Report is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. The assessment revealed the following environmental conditions in connection with the site: • Two above - ground storage tanks, likely holding petroleum products, are currently located and in use along the north end of the site; • An area of cars and miscellaneous vehicles are located on the northeastern portion of the site; and • The northern portion of the site has been used as a sandblasting facility for approximately 25 years. The above - ground storage tanks will be removed as part of the development and remedial action will be taken if necessary. Further evaluation of the soils in the vicinity of the above- ground storage tanks and the vehicle storage area will be conducted to determine if any petroleum releases have occurred or whether past land uses may have adversely impacted the soils on the site. The proposed commercial and residential developments are not expected to have petroleum or oil storage tanks. The land uses associated with the commercial development are expected to be retail and/or restaurant types of uses. 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added 1,352 . Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) 275. Estimated total average daily traffic generated 11,839. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence 1,155 (the peak hour is 4:30 -5:30 pm). Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 22 Lino Lakes, MN Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. A memo detailing the traffic analysis for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development is attached in Appendix C and provides further analysis of the forecasted traffic volumes and conditions in and around the proposed development. The proposed development site plan (Figure 3) depicts a number of buildings listed as commercial/retail/office with the option of multiple floors. Based on a preliminary review of commercial, retail and office markets, it has been assumed that these buildings would have retail on the first floor and office on the second floor except for those clearly defined as housing. Where housing has been shown in the building type, all floors above the first floor are considered to have some type of housing. AM and PM Peak Hour trip generation rates were developed for the proposed development as well as the existing facilities (City Hall complex, Fairview Clinic, and Lino Lakes State Bank). Trips to /from each building have been assigned to the street system within the development. This provided a tabulation of traffic volumes at various locations within the development, as well as at the intersection of Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive (CSAH 23). According to this analysis, the Peak Hour traffic volume is 1,155 trips, which occurs from 4:30 -5:30 pm. Based on the traffic analysis, a concept transportation improvement plan was developed for the Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive intersection. On Town Center Parkway, the plan includes three outbound lanes to separate left turn, through, and right turning traffic and also includes two inbound lanes. Signalization of this intersection would also be necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service. According to the 2020 Ttraffic Volume Forecast in the Lino Lakes Transportation Plan, traffic volumes on Lake Drive are anticipated to increase to over 17,000 trips per day. Regardless of the proposed development, improvements to Lake Drive are expected in the future. However, to accommodate the full development of the Legacy at Woods Edge Development, several additional improvements to Lake Drive will need to be made. The concept transportation plan has proposed the construction of two southbound left turn lanes between the intersection of Town Center Parkway and the I -35W bridge. Furthermore, traffic signals at Town Center Parkway and both ramps to I -35W are anticipated. To signalize the south ramp intersection, the existing off ramp and on ramp intersections, which are now separated, need to be aligned to a single intersection, which would require the reconstruction of approximately 400 -feet of the on ramp. Figure 9 depicts a conceptual layout of the proposed improvements to Lake Drive. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN 23 • • CITY OF IN OKES Lake Dave — ceomeeoe 11 el7.mxd 11/07/200300 Legacy at Woods Edge Development Proposed Lake Drive Geometrics 150 300 600 Legend ---- STRIPING Traffic Signal ........ BRIDGE OPT2•LAKEDRIVE Source: Anoka County, Lino Lakes, and SEH. I:I Coordinate System: Anoka County, NA003, Feet Figure 9 20. Ultimately, the capacity on Lake Drive past the Town Center Parkway intersection will need to be expanded. This will require additional lanes on Lake Drive and the reconstruction of the I- 35W bridge. Turn lanes will be necessary at the interchange ramps to accommodate future traffic as well as full build -out traffic from the Legacy at Woods Edge Development. In the interim, between the reconstruction of the bridge over I -35W and the development of portions or all of the Legacy at Woods Edge Development, an intermediate intersection needs to be developed that has been described above. The traffic volumes for the year 2020 along with full build -out of Legacy at Woods Edge Development, including traffic from the Lino Lakes Business Park will be part of a simulation program that is being developed. Results of the traffic simulation as it relates to the regional transportation system will be shared and discussed with Mn/DOT and the Anoka County Highway Department. A parking analysis was completed to determine if the site plan has provided adequate parking space for the proposed level of development. The analysis segmented the site into four zones to compare the availability of parking spaces to the potential demand within each zone. Based on the analysis, the site has adequately addressed the parking demands within each zone. The southeast portion of the site will rely upon a cross -use agreement with the YMCA and retailers to account for approximately 40 additional spaces. Furthermore, the analysis indicates there would be approximately 405 underground parking stalls associated with the multi - family residential development. 22. Vehicle - related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. The Legacy at Woods Edge Development is not anticipated to have substantial air quality impacts or cause air quality related concerns. The forecasted traffic volumes generated by the site are lower than the volumes of traffic typically associated with carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations approaching state air quality standards. A detailed air emission analysis was not completed for this project. According to the Mn/DOT Hotspot Screening Method Flow Chart (see Figure 10g), the benchmark annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT), which is 77,200 trips, would not be reached nor does the proposed development site affect any of the MPCA monitored locations or top seven intersections in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Hotspot screening is a microscale analysis that primarily addresses localized emissions of carbon monoxide (CO). In addition, large projects such as shopping center or mixed -use developments no longer need to apply for an Indirect Source Permit to the MPCA, as the MPCA has eliminated the Indirect Source Permit Program. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 25 Lino Lakes, MN Figure 310 Hotspot Screening Method Flow Chart Subject Project Greater Than The Benchmark AADT? (77.200 AADT) YES NO Project Involves /Affects Short List of 3 MPCA Monitored Locations, Or Top 7 Intersections? Do Hot Spot Analysis NO No Analysis Needed YES 23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone - depleting chemicals (chloro- fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Stationary sources of air emissions will include only natural gas space heaters. The emissions from these units will not have a substantial impact on the ambient air quality. 24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? X Yes _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Construction related impacts such as dust, odors and noise have been considered. Some air pollution is expected to be generated during times of construction. These temporary impacts will be present only during construction. The only existing receptors that could experience impacts are those residences located immediately south of the site. Temporary construction Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 26 Lino Lakes, MN impacts to these receptors are anticipated to be minimal. Following the complete build -out of the site, air pollution will be generated by traffic moving along the local and regional street system. Dust is expected to be generated by on -site construction equipment during times of construction. Dust generation will be minimized by enforcing best management practices during construction along with any other applicable permits required by the City of Lino Lakes. Practices that may be enforced include: 1) minimizing the periods and extent of areas being exposed or graded; 2) watering construction areas and haul roads during periods of high winds or high levels of construction activity; 3) minimizing the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces; and 4) covering and/or spraying material piles and truck loads. No substantial odor sources are expected within the proposed development site. Noise will be generated during the construction of the public improvements (e.g. roads, sewer, water) and during the construction of residential and commercial/office buildings in the development. A variety of equipment, such as scrapers, loaders, dozers, backhoes, and trucks, will be implemented to construct the proposed improvements. These types of equipment have average noise levels in the range of 74 to 91 dBA at 50 -feet away from the source. A number of factors can affect noise attenuation; however, it can be generally estimated that a certain sound will decrease by 6 db for each doubling of the distance from the poise source. City ordinance regulates the daytime hours of construction to minimize noise impacts to adjacent areas. Increased traffic noise is another element that was considered for the proposed development. However, the associated increases in traffic volumes are not anticipated to cause a substantial change in noise levels. Traffic noise increases must be 3 decibels or greater in order to be detectable by the average human ear. A 3- decibel increase occurs when traffic volumes double (100 percent increase). The only sensitive noise receptors near the proposed development are a small group of existing residential properties located south of the site. Noise mitigation is not proposed at this time because construction noise will be temporary and all City and County roads in the area are exempt from state noise standards. The only nearby road that is not exempt from State noise standards is I -35W. Noise levels along the local roadways are not anticipated to exceed State noise standards, nor are they anticipated to be greater than noise levels that are commonly experienced within a residential and commercial area. Furthermore, adequate building setbacks and acoustical site planning techniques may be further considered in the placement and arrangement of buildings to shield more sensitive land uses from noise impacts. 25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _Yes X No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes X No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? X Yes _No Scenic views and vistas? _Yes X No Other unique resources? X Yes _No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 27 Lino Lakes, MN Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding archaeology and historic resources in the area. The SHPO completed their review, acknowledged that the overall area contains a large number of recorded sites, and recommended no further study is necessary at the site. A copy of the SHPO correspondence letter isn attached in Appendix D. Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve is located immediately south and east of the proposed development. The park is owned and managed by Anoka County and is also known to have archaeological and environmentally unique features. The site plan has been designed to maintain natural buffers between the park and the proposed development, minimizing potential impacts of the development on the park and park users. Furthermore, the development is being planned to include -trail links to provide use of the park by development residents, the YMCA, and other visitors to the Town Center. 26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? _Yes X No; If yes, explain. Only routine visual impacts associated with construction activities and typical urban development are anticipated by the proposed development. The study area contains gently rolling topography. There are views of scattered wetlands and Marshan Lake along the southerly boundary of the site. This area has already been developed with the City offices, police station, and early childhood development center. The proposed development will change the nature of a portion of the site from open space to one that is suburban in nature. The type of development and potential visual impacts are similar to other suburban settings in the met el:kali-area:- The Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, May 2000, will be utilized to guide the orderly and integrated development of the site, which includes a mix of land use (retail shops, office spaces, housing, recreation, community facilities, and open space). The Guide emphasizes the importance of creating attractive gathering spots, commons areas, and comfortable walking environments for visitors and residents. Furthermore, the Guide identifies the importance of maintaining a sense of place by incorporating tree -lined boulevards, natural drainage swales, open spaces, appropriate building materials (wood, masonry, and stone), landscaping, and architectural standards. A copy of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide is available for review at the Lino Lakes City Hall. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? X Yes No. S If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 28 Lino Lakes, MN The development is subject to the policies and recommendations set forth in the following plans: • City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan » Land Use Plan » Sanitary Sewer Plan » Transportation Plan » Surface Water Management Plan • City of Lino Lakes Subdivision and Platting Ordinance • City of Lino Lakes Shoreland and Floodplain Ordinances • Master Plan — Village Development, 1997 • Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide • City of Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development • Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan The City of Lino Lakes has an existing comprehensive plan, which includes a land use plan and several other planning elements. The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the project area for mixed use development and includes the Master Plan for this site, developed in 1997. The City's Comprehensive Plan specifically states the following: "The southeast quadrant of the I- 35W/Lake Drive interchange represents the Lino Lakes Village area. The Village is intended to integrate a mixture of commercial, medium and high density residential and public land uses in an attractive and cohesive design." The Legacy at Woods Edge Development plan emphasizes the following objectives: 1. A 65 -acre complex of buildings in a controlled setting. 2. An integrated mix of uses that responds to residents' needs. 3. A gathering place that creates a sense of community, civic identity and pride. 4. A place that defines the unique character of the community. 5. An economic development initiative to increase the value of the commercial tax base. 6. A distinctive, consistent architectural style that promotes high quality, aesthetically pleasing commercial buildings. The proposed mix of residential and commercial, civic, and recreational uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Village Master Plan. The City's Zoning Ordinance provides for mixed -use development through the use of the Planned Unit Development process. Additionally, the Village Master Plan included design guidelines that are being implemented as part of the proposed development. The City also has a surface water management plan that must be consistent with the larger plan for the Rice Creek Watershed District. The proposed project has been reviewed for consistency with the surface water management policies and the site plan has included natural site infiltration as recommended by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 29 Lino Lakes, MN 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? X Yes _No. If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) The proposed development site is presently not fully served by the level of physical infrastructure required for the proposed development. Therefore, extension of roadway and utility lines will occur as a result of the project. The only existing infrastructure provided in the area include roadways (Town Center Parkway and Village Drive) and sanitary sewer and water that currently serve the City Hall Complex. 29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). There are no related or anticipated future stages of this project. Additional development and redevelopment of land throughout Lino Lakes is anticipated. The City recently approved an EAW for a 30 -acre Marshan Lakes Industrial Park development, located approximately one quarter mile southwest of the Legacy at Woods Edge Development. The transportation infrastructure improvements required for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development have taken into consideration the needs of the industrial park development. Development is anticipated to continue in the Lino Lakes Marketplace Development (Super Target, Kohl's, etc.), which is located in the northeast quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared and adopted for the development in 2001. 30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. All potential environmental impacts have been addressed by items 1 through 28. 31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN 30 The analysis conducted to address the preceding questions did not reveal any substantial impacts that would require further investigation prior to proceeding with development of the site. The permits and approvals listed in the response to Question #8 will be obtained at the appropriate times during the project development process. The relevant issues related to the development are: wetlands, erosion/sedimentation, water quality /storm water management, traffic, and land use compatibility. Wetlands The proposed development will be designed and constructed in a fashion as to avoid impacting any wetlands on the site. Erosion/Sedimentation Construction of the project will disturb more than 1 acre of land and therefore must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A storm water runoff and erosion control plan will be prepared. The collection and treatment of runoff through BMP's such as grass swales, temporary sediment basins, storm water detention ponds, silt fencing, and vegetative filter/buffer strips will be utilized to avoid and minimize potential erosion impacts that may result during construction activities. Water Quality /Storm water Management A surface water management plan for the development is being proposed that will retain storm water runoff on -site for the purpose of improving water quality and- incorporate infiltration to reduce surface discharge and promote recharge of the groundwater. Based on the water quality analysis, the proposed development has maintained adequate area for the retention (ponds) and infiltration (natural and underground chambers) of surface water runoff. Before construction can proceed, both the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District must issue permits to satisfy surface water runoff regulations. Traffic Traffic forecasts indicate that improvements to Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive (CSAH 23) are necessary to accommodate the full build out of the proposed development. These improvements include additional turn lanes, installation of traffic signals, and the realignment of the southbound on ramp to I -35W. The traffic volumes for the year 2020 along with full build -out of Legacy at Woods Edge Development, including traffic from the Lino Lakes Business Park will be part of a simulation program that is being developed. Results of the traffic simulation will be shared and discussed with Mn/DOT and the Anoka County Highway Department. Land Use Compatibility The proposed development is compatible with surrounding land uses and is consistent with the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan for this site. Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 31 Lino Lakes, MN RGU CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Title Date Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651- 296 -8253, or www.mnplan.state.mn.us Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 32 Lino Lakes, MN Appendix A MNDNR Natural Heritage Database Response Letter Rare Plant Survey Results Memorandum, July 14, 2003 Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 33 Lino Lakes, MN Appendix B Review of Water Quantity and Quality Technical Memorandum Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 34 Lino Lakes, MN Appendix C Legacy at woods Edge Traffic Volume Analysis Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT Lino Lakes, MN 35 Appendix D State Historic Preservation Office Letter Legacy at Woods Edge Development EAW DRAFT 36 Lino Lakes, MN P E W 11\14RY PLAT OF: THE O. 2 FOR: THE HARTFORD GROUP, THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, AND THE YMCA GRAPHIC SCALE f 0004. b. A MLI.p.1 Sea II. n•. P. 11.• _- s,.- 44 ----I a ; '- .� ad :P. k� 1 i PM Mt / / '4• /X i/ lP F �X ,,,,,,,,N, 96 0 mo / , .� i r a -2•' ,a,;' f 2 s 4•, ,r ' � ► (/� ► +�V :Sg,>R %kr "lAace. SKETCH' ' 58941'i19 "6 68:.15 11•1141•8 of PA MO IMO ' 1∎11 M,In 1 ii EV ...w....+1SC10. M+. PEW saxM Mt _cdMMOOMP MMIt02LN 2Wait /ixmlr GCTd - Tbl....+.y.4 • MSS* ...L Raevi ..M/.P.W 6..M9 M PAIL MAWS AA E01M0/.v4 PoM.u• NI.•00u M ..*MM/ Nu v011700 M M 0047 N Ile Lam 11.. Mnol IM Om - A AN re AAA a• •1.y mom. W M•INM bb 000 •b4• b • 0.8008• PM Pm I.m..n1M,.b, M .54.031 N MIL - A«%.1•• M001�w no nN *hew - y1•P.••.000.1 N no 00800401 w. M So MOM* M AMM M 1y tAl /.• 40 .NM 11/03p1. - POPS O1 WPM, Dom M .MID My foil F*A«Iy (.440 .4y M6 AIl1•. • M.b) -M w ..0.0..0.0 W« « M•M4 W 1.M •MM. E[I91 • 9.41410. Mem. A* O 4.Iw •.a Mon. SA •wr4 M ly .I.«,..•1 Lam Se VW 4.77,1 In AA I t M•0. IW M rsN F.I.LO• PAIS SMOLA - wL1yl -•j Incian.• 11.12ao@rr t1P3PTO7M44 • 1•ISQi/sl �`- .Z5,0�LiLi IIMIS 4M MI:E;NIDI MSC, ,a FA7SSI t4MIi' f7E S ti"ri �i1•E:� #1t& fSIND114t_Jfra a41 AI �.�:4IMM is_ I.a� • .M p�,1� M IMN..�sel 01•10 t$ M 11 r.. A, Ibw. 33. �*SIMN isi 0 M aw11 .. N 1* Qfi•fLb.1. .5000 InfNh��.gMrlMY. MJtiYyww~wi.. wl.34 M«L• pleRe onMA oweM� w P.P.'S,. PAOLA 1M MMN 040001*WLM.SLr•w WPM O«ur00 Map RAuM► A. Pm SA. Ml. M111 OM«M• 118 008 MOM mom 11.. M MI N•M O..b.w of M•.M M PM D Pon «w ..n.... MOM NPol. N da N4WSol Om IP MI Poo 4. 000,.wwl u* N M. WM. P• Mwn N 111. LN .APN 6.8.91.. MM /On MwM■ 9M M M MC. Whlion 4014.110 memo IM MO .* N 401•00. N.NM 01 SO nom M N MI SF* 1) Moo MX mom.* OM PA feed M. pm' N w SAVA A W OM MOM. :=1,1/ M.Mi I.Miy. OMV lbw.. Asp* fee �M 4 17/47/4 YW LOP • N mN..n�wIIMA.y. Mw MN d• wPo.Mr�w`�Iac YA Po WwM M• Moo Dna fat MA "'N W 41A Is b. ..4w°k40.0*0A0 wA.M.lybA0M TM 1'Mb MM«w J0• am. 1.1041 MAO mom MAN Al N.sr Me al PA MlcA NIIIrr. rr Meq«..N /MMMMMI00lwMpwFp t• A•M •.•.4.•• M. not w M.. 1.M N M. Mom IT DOM mWMt W.le to Awl 05*waMlw MM .'V.wl MA MNM miff O MC A.M. 1l«. M.. MOM. MIS mop. ros wMMN Lr LM rm. 14.1401 E MILS W M N ••••••ml W{ .•M M. N 048 A =5/... moo MwwlA ..My M ..M PA w w P." MAP. w4L«M wrl 01 •fohl wove M se Me AsPo am IWO OM 001..•.. IMVIWi rie7r.Mw rU01r.1.101.a. 8.0 S'.�'•01wLpr�•O :w *In M NN MY M MI A. O PS a Solo CM SS Apse. M{ Moo fpnor .IOW.11... *0Nw wb AM 4•.411..18 MWMc1 MI 10•.« N MMw MMM MM Mom of Min M to MOM 1..1.0{/.1/8 q�N I•.rw 1..i. WAr /..•.�On ie M+b./w PPM 11.-18 on p e44SEWSW S44 Ow. MS MOM. Si�.N W.r lI +4.... MP "OM Om Om ••monN NMh 0101.40. • • L.1fd( M 001NA00.w1. Mom •• O•p IO A[WM IA t AMP 4.11 fro= no ml _ Mo Moon�/yPN•t •QOM Ss O•i11.o.'M M .Mon b.w.M :...�M •N�•.�� A4..M..1. .. 7; =7* ",..41:.711,1112,1%%.` . E1mE MA Om M .M1 .1 A.N 6888 NM .M1 IM N M MM. MN M M M.IMS OMCN NNW I {IMM114 MP S4 Inn Mon Ohm. MO.Nb Moir ere Pr*A..004 'rte. MM M.p 41.mwOo. IIOMy ~Iffy •«1 MM arm/1 ••0 019... •• Pls.w. 078 or 1M 1y viva xg•M11.n 0114 AN 1 •n My ,SOMMI Jarmo APIA 4 Pm N Po MP N Mnn.•.IL •.1c 11`{•1.0111 11a INN • BIND ONb1TOp . LINIMSTOP AM. Mt RCLE PAAPAIIII 417014 111.14181.0. NArA.,7N71.Il uN KE w S • ,..,....„,... rr,� �9 u , t sE"i t ,,� .1a 1E i. Js1 3 �r 'Sq� !! %kr "lAace. SKETCH' ' 58941'i19 "6 68:.15 11•1141•8 of PA MO IMO ' 1∎11 M,In 1 ii EV ...w....+1SC10. M+. PEW saxM Mt _cdMMOOMP MMIt02LN 2Wait /ixmlr GCTd - Tbl....+.y.4 • MSS* ...L Raevi ..M/.P.W 6..M9 M PAIL MAWS AA E01M0/.v4 PoM.u• NI.•00u M ..*MM/ Nu v011700 M M 0047 N Ile Lam 11.. Mnol IM Om - A AN re AAA a• •1.y mom. W M•INM bb 000 •b4• b • 0.8008• PM Pm I.m..n1M,.b, M .54.031 N MIL - A«%.1•• M001�w no nN *hew - y1•P.••.000.1 N no 00800401 w. M So MOM* M AMM M 1y tAl /.• 40 .NM 11/03p1. - POPS O1 WPM, Dom M .MID My foil F*A«Iy (.440 .4y M6 AIl1•. • M.b) -M w ..0.0..0.0 W« « M•M4 W 1.M •MM. E[I91 • 9.41410. Mem. A* O 4.Iw •.a Mon. SA •wr4 M ly .I.«,..•1 Lam Se VW 4.77,1 In AA I t M•0. IW M rsN F.I.LO• PAIS SMOLA - wL1yl -•j Incian.• 11.12ao@rr t1P3PTO7M44 • 1•ISQi/sl �`- .Z5,0�LiLi IIMIS 4M MI:E;NIDI MSC, ,a FA7SSI t4MIi' f7E S ti"ri �i1•E:� #1t& fSIND114t_Jfra a41 AI �.�:4IMM is_ I.a� • .M p�,1� M IMN..�sel 01•10 t$ M 11 r.. A, Ibw. 33. �*SIMN isi 0 M aw11 .. N 1* Qfi•fLb.1. .5000 InfNh��.gMrlMY. MJtiYyww~wi.. wl.34 M«L• pleRe onMA oweM� w P.P.'S,. PAOLA 1M MMN 040001*WLM.SLr•w WPM O«ur00 Map RAuM► A. Pm SA. Ml. M111 OM«M• 118 008 MOM mom 11.. M MI N•M O..b.w of M•.M M PM D Pon «w ..n.... MOM NPol. N da N4WSol Om IP MI Poo 4. 000,.wwl u* N M. WM. P• Mwn N 111. LN .APN 6.8.91.. MM /On MwM■ 9M M M MC. Whlion 4014.110 memo IM MO .* N 401•00. N.NM 01 SO nom M N MI SF* 1) Moo MX mom.* OM PA feed M. pm' N w SAVA A W OM MOM. :=1,1/ M.Mi I.Miy. OMV lbw.. Asp* fee �M 4 17/47/4 YW LOP • N mN..n�wIIMA.y. Mw MN d• wPo.Mr�w`�Iac YA Po WwM M• Moo Dna fat MA "'N W 41A Is b. ..4w°k40.0*0A0 wA.M.lybA0M TM 1'Mb MM«w J0• am. 1.1041 MAO mom MAN Al N.sr Me al PA MlcA NIIIrr. rr Meq«..N /MMMMMI00lwMpwFp t• A•M •.•.4.•• M. not w M.. 1.M N M. Mom IT DOM mWMt W.le to Awl 05*waMlw MM .'V.wl MA MNM miff O MC A.M. 1l«. M.. MOM. MIS mop. ros wMMN Lr LM rm. 14.1401 E MILS W M N ••••••ml W{ .•M M. N 048 A =5/... moo MwwlA ..My M ..M PA w w P." MAP. w4L«M wrl 01 •fohl wove M se Me AsPo am IWO OM 001..•.. IMVIWi rie7r.Mw rU01r.1.101.a. 8.0 S'.�'•01wLpr�•O :w *In M NN MY M MI A. O PS a Solo CM SS Apse. M{ Moo fpnor .IOW.11... *0Nw wb AM 4•.411..18 MWMc1 MI 10•.« N MMw MMM MM Mom of Min M to MOM 1..1.0{/.1/8 q�N I•.rw 1..i. WAr /..•.�On ie M+b./w PPM 11.-18 on p e44SEWSW S44 Ow. MS MOM. Si�.N W.r lI +4.... MP "OM Om Om ••monN NMh 0101.40. • • L.1fd( M 001NA00.w1. Mom •• O•p IO A[WM IA t AMP 4.11 fro= no ml _ Mo Moon�/yPN•t •QOM Ss O•i11.o.'M M .Mon b.w.M :...�M •N�•.�� A4..M..1. .. 7; =7* ",..41:.711,1112,1%%.` . E1mE MA Om M .M1 .1 A.N 6888 NM .M1 IM N M MM. MN M M M.IMS OMCN NNW I {IMM114 MP S4 Inn Mon Ohm. MO.Nb Moir ere Pr*A..004 'rte. MM M.p 41.mwOo. IIOMy ~Iffy •«1 MM arm/1 ••0 019... •• Pls.w. 078 or 1M 1y viva xg•M11.n 0114 AN 1 •n My ,SOMMI Jarmo APIA 4 Pm N Po MP N Mnn.•.IL •.1c 11`{•1.0111 11a INN • BIND ONb1TOp . LINIMSTOP AM. Mt RCLE PAAPAIIII 417014 111.14181.0. NArA.,7N71.Il 50UNIDARY 4 TOPOGRAPHIC 4 TREE FOR: HARTFORD GROUP, INC. 12100 SINGLETREE LANE, SUIT11.4 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 553e44 -19 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE t V 7 T ( SI Ind tires r r Oa 03/1 of r IT. ty. a. Mn 1'EMT 'Y SURvE1' NTT 'M .9_ PHOTO 10 0 .000 T. 1 72./ I OsItH r •yI 12 nr �. .m• \ „pod .00. • <:... a A. sM / rW1 do rildod or -•d- - 7412-- _.. 11 .29 •M✓ ..M .w. ..a. y. , Mr_ 'y.n ...�i,dt'911,91 9 $ ' ,a - ; a WET LAND L t M• PHOTO 14 fA 8 eto A. • • 7.11. 80.9199, -A 0.90 0 1129) 1/9 •0v r Sr0« i), OM.1.. 71. Re. 92. bIZIM - bet Cad. d1.. - .24291. 0116.9 ON. romp. Id...N N 920 12[.4 00 F dm Mao 0.0 * 329999* N 2001 - 9mhf• On. on on 200.0 emus. 9F 7...0 +0 M.. MMbot V.9. 0«. ! N MN .st Lawn«0 ...dM.1.1^•2 0• 91.6. 0 AIy add d .0M1m 10 19•70 shwa 6.020. 117 S.Oyv M wN.e1 N 2..0,92 bow 229.°1 N a191 F..Me.a Mw1. 11.0..0 1619 . - OWN. d9. tent. 00 e9d . * 11000000 an..0 03110 Wad. 0.11.040. O1. MM. w. M. N ,90 001 boob N rd - M.1 I✓ 2./000 M doMr 009. TREE OETAL Meal. 091.9. .pos.-,-- Dom. Tn• 00..01 D.n✓w r... dew« in d9.« Od.T 150 192. awn... N 4921.0• e... Iewde .se 19201 emaeee 9.m We. 1 1 692.15 589,10) 'E 11094•09 11940e.1191p 1292. T ` WET LAND 1A• tre It /T 0 WO ! l N.O]r/r.0317 PV.CJ1le_en *Y-e000 -24x0 11.61302 09909 PO CS 10..92 F.s11de...1 17a. • 0* yin d.esewl M • +. O.M.. 1000 11044. 0.04 000 T .00 31.1 a 099291 WOO P. O 0..191 9692 Ugh, O 0.0191 09.180 ■ 0919291 IWII/ 90 ▪ Owe. Odd Ow 10 D«Nr 9109.0 991 ■ 0..991 9.9100* Sem O 001.091 O.IM. 000 0.92• Nod SM. °9900• 04 Om.. O.d 9•0 • 09-90011/16011 2-.•`9 O«.I.. 010049 9112 -4. OONr O0*ON 1190 - o- 09•••• S.Nq Snow -+...- 01092 Sy. 9.w D0e09 Wend PO.. 010••• 412.00 8..109 flrn l 92.191 0.. 0,. ?Mw O.M Odd. •m.N• 0000 991004. Gi'K 09Mw 3.0 /06 0.1.100 96d0 0*10 01 91.1 e9 We NOW /OM 91-0-0 mot .n u I hrb.9. MI ...on W.. t 91199..1 .w.unnr T9. 091 0.0 0!90009 II PA•1SA CRISTNG PROPERTY CESCRPTIZOIS B2912. olatom. MaNAW MI N M MI N. 7 /A9 UM Aww MwMMw. O«... SW.I d.02..00.. rY 91...9.012 n«. Xem �pArf.M 9.91 «Mrob F...Ye 0 a.t on OF. fo• OW. 01.1 ✓Cw.«wt IM. VW WO - 0919210.01. r Cr. 1. 04...10 n«M *1watF6..30A..�.010000 F..«I0..«N.1w� ..*4 ✓ .. FY+. 0.0 0 0 ▪ Arl.wrm.sl. MIA.N.w1 y d. .M .29.+.12 n. M r W er091 .mw AO 91 *209.* t9 rwd W tMMMN9Mw ...MO TM A'r Ym IS.111.90 21.0la .M ✓ .0.0.00.09 «....1« Mbo. O. ✓wd AM 91. .301 0600 .s1 011. 1 0 110 I61 Pwl..sw r . M✓ .M29} 2.Y. 1 7.92 w0.YtzMrdI 4M ti M� .r r /▪ .O DO OM, Idow Mw WMF. Mad 11...0112 0047. Cr t Idt Mind .N 1.0..0 y.Y• N do.00. If. lo O ✓11MrrgVann r1/;• n.�M Y M�M.e�irt Nw iww«I«y«�✓ H lo 0292 .«6M'A1.1101 Yri M✓ briMM..4.✓btw�1M ~ u«I.Nw l�imn�6lM Mw "...Tv,- WM• r10.9a *Mg sdaubs SS ...«w M NM M «W MI0 0Yr.. LrA'YdW«wr.wl6.1r.m91w0. 0092 ✓.//A9 12 bon w. W«le Fw.✓.wu1 919204 IMO M.N 02..0120 9921•• 17 ea Arm n+r ..?"M .w.g09• w.m w Mr F a r9.12"•.M.""•1Od �..x�� 0.0.92..0 A.w. reyrwlr... polfff 0*«12.. tMb 12.1l1 .0.° 10 M ...r ...I. 0 9dS IS *Iv I4.NrR My:.✓ 4ln rlrr r M A.e 920 me 991 M of � e . M e 0*.Oner M«r, 0.91 maw. 17. 61? S. *29911. 1 *9122. M IY rW t«.. dd. MOO 9191 wr IFi.�/n r S�SN •Y.«....yy r hoe OM b.* 901,00 .wM.bol iww fwH .p a. «. ✓MIS b Ognwo l dad Itr M M My. n woad MU dad/. .b eM 00 O. 00 /V On. N.M. IM!l1M M. YNw. Of on* 921 InyCrMwM: M«. n•. ]. M wdnt 91. nI.Cd 104 I.d .91.190.99 I«C Mom 9921 W 9 n9.✓..M.O r.29 dadd 100 pr O.000..«Mwr. fat 50.0 1.07 19.• bog km. Mg. S..n aOWIffIw O..SMi rim. 0009* mldal.1 Mr. I• •a..r 0. *ea *MO Mlaia f01 W.MMrM°~isLSM. nom I...b' MI d q R F Yyw✓y M0920.00 0 to.y Ws o IM fI1mA /30044 0..✓0.11101A2 e0.4Aww 0..92 .......N �f .0007.end. N bN .r Md 6.rF... 0.1. A ./0... 4 017 +1W Iw 0odd 012«0 by dowry Moto uemc X00 F.. Odd 9902.. r M, W F Id 1*929 A4 CAW o.d■ rvbol r OWbo SO 00041 .Od 1A. .O..INYMr '.. ew 00...0.•YrM�9 F.;wwe.«a. 0009000 I. ��«...FY.w0•14.0 O./r. t� 9102...«. ido.r.:.r.00 .90.s1µ1. 109111 aW«A 2020 W..W Ow. ilww!R11MYY.w..I N/M! GAME ▪ IY19 910 M r 9. 01.0.910.. 0 OM 100 MM M .1 WWI AMiw.12CNo .Ww 6 Po 0* r OwIM I) MN 349192. 08 = dYO..Y •/w0..%Y.d1.1 ..10-�7O..0* 000 wl...u..wl 1 9000 9010 1901 92 99919 PI91 w /2201 w w0.aeyoft wen. Y MY0.1 SPII'.OF0 610 0011 001 waly92.0.12.0 SW Sw.e.r 0100 . la.. N b1. 9.1 N Min I MO 6 SON*, INC. um, 111111114,real tee 1.100141tO 1 W1. W C■COS Mak PN 09004 a11.11........0lvw...e . n SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS Bou AR1 4 TOPOGRAPHIC 4 THE _ Y NTOIR`- SURVEY •FOR> — IdARTFORD._C ROUP, INS 12100 SINal -ETREE LANE, SUITE 114 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 -1933 VICINITY MAP NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE =; -w 011 w1n /rr Tea n, M 71, llow itintat I • new ) 1 lank • M A TRd� f1ETAL On.lx Median ' ec°e �1 6.5.. Ax 0.x64* ¢ dxlxTex *0..6316,43.50 Thaw Are yarr law ti": of 6, ..a..l xe Might of 1'0 3 I4*el wag - bow5.x505d ISM tii caw dSMnIt, ixn.hj A. APTS tt a..au.m - Txt3 (WAWA stn) _ IODTE9 - S Owl M1a. ep.1 - NAM va¢eel WMm ryehy.r Adana M .He er c¢ RIM Sane e.u.x 1140 and 49.1. MS - era4fd ended as n aware! Oarox - N8son. ax M4+a1 .in•.1 Me bode N nb v.. ie.Annka NNxxnarn remnba are. m0 Niue la Mw Aeon ewe. My amp b arrxl M and Yn 5.44 e e I lwuwv xmwwxt r wham., MN 313. - alvenK M 1 lr. aN eMr wrists Mparwnla 6450/ ehlN/ MAW. 5061 had. den mam inn n the h4 416 rak W era - Sao Welt N t.kxM M PedeH do ..* . L 11.4olesbno 11nemm.l Sawa A On.d . Sn 11eaasn4 t.l 8 0...0 tea emew0 i. ..50x.. Omwp 0435506 El Neale. 1.0 .w. wk acnon. 3634 sty PaN P Dolan. Then 6 /4 • Senates On ads a nrnr San(, sea a bona calla On m Oar.les reran... On d Dana. Sa'4..y lever 1x4d0 m denotes Cal. Saki * • Onnloo Awn S... I11A0 * 04 O.xnx WIr 110 Z( daxle. rev Mmxl Onelx O* Coro sn �• -- ows at* The Oaehr wlxnrr —•— Dnex 3340.0 Tame 0.rrlw Sum Sower —.� Oen* 0.0.14 f mymow garrotes &Mad 11.148. o.wex nw on. omen* Omer O.nelx G onelx s.rWex hrwMa rood Ml 4. Wwln bn, 4 r"" r 1 / • / /33':6*_ J0 „a` .,, / r- / / ,..w / • I __y. / / / i Jag ®_ - , / /�4 / 1 1 L / 1 / / 6 / / h. /'_•0'~61 \\. / / 0 / 4 // / / / / / / 0 / / / / / r r / Gale / /'C•1Nf m4* 614 44075 NW:OvajW51)4Vm.O1)lJwwW,eete'S ) 111616.01 14301 M 611 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS PirAtittleArr t4 ARONITECTIENOSEER DEVELOPER ®® 11.*/ WI, Y Si Om wail Wail] %O +. k In We b.. 114*11. Y1YM.R.ION STRUCTURAL ENGINEER N. olio t, 1h1 MYNA, 1M WM OVJNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC HUD PROJECT NUMBER: 000 -00000 WASTER SITE PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 1JNOLAI*,l BIBOrA ISSUE: 11/10/03 - O01 030171 L REV. TM WEST 0 No REV. nos Neu SHEETTIILE: ant PLAN SHEET NURSER: C -1.0 • Orr rxr-s- r r T` r ___�,- - ` (� ill ■ e ,,,�• �.`` t� G ICI )1 I ,ter p"-_. •�� I ��, ►I�I�I' `'`111 i � � _4_- �� -.� _ _11 �'j ;��Ij� 1111 8117' : } �� _.� ' /► I . \\� \\ /�" fM» �� 1I'. 1 /S2 1 ,',. 1 / / ) L • r 11 11 LEGEND 4T PM= /our. A6M R 10180818 SLT FENCE OIN1N _c 601 ROCK CONSTRUCTION RNTRAINCE YrrPOa1RY caner KI T RM' KI E W800 RECAYIMOADO S D. 11e.0 Urn Far Crane Pod. Shedd 80 I -r 9tt D. Appagab 51m,NA1 B. Racal N A Lap, At L.eat 8 bas Tdd. D. A9P.pab Shoed 8. AYtOf SO FM b LAVA MC SIwW M Al A Lea Dm Ndh Of Tu Plop...d Real M4111IE1141X0 TM Rack Pod 8.00 0¢atloay Mohlanenee IA Ronan Ta41g 08 PAM Onto P.wd Ikeda Mb May R.Wf. Pablo Tap Or olg NR 0.491000 Rod Or R.nWwl A.d. T.10*00 9w Of T. Pea ® COIIMIR La W. 818181080 MWI. MC. MORIQIe/DDNTpP/T,AwND ent=LL.DN81NSNIOMA@ AMININIML CONTRACTIIII RESPNNNMPM NO'RY8R ALL YPRTPRATR IIRHY COPMNN, A181810888STMOIIRCALL PM WATCH Of 1111A1N011111NI M1PORIAIM SittRILIGINDLRENSIDDEER WORM LNiUN'BO@A1@TIM8LY RINONNMRPACNRDUOIRILNI1M AA8 @P@AMM, miao % PN1NO11NtL ORnuawLO@ONTAL) L R 11NY /ONTO @ RMISSOM 8801 YL@GTIOR. AO W T0M HOLD LM8Y11N8I SHOULD RAMIS &IL SURFACE 1LNDLYROTN@ ®TO 11tO11CNNN101,1N11L MOM TANS RACE AT MO 71111111111111118.88181 @R1AT@a SCRAM TO P1100011IA 08017711,HAIR OU PACE 88111 TO M 01IMNO MANUAL PDR C01187111/010111811121311.1. UMW CALLN W AL1N1N0 RNCN@ OP CONNNRI1011 M1N1 181/011/0 IM 1 ®MN MCOD MACH. SMNtT10MPNNINAINNY (81 TNNYLBM481. 1pN0@M W.ODILOTOPM CePZTNNR-0ROC1Y N181L@■I@RATMIAIN78NDIN /1119171/UL GRAMM L LOLO TAC NINPT NS P4 SPLCM81,TNN YNiIRN ry URN YIL r P1AM MOCCNN TIMNINNTYIN.81MNN1AMNM[OIOPPRY! OCIANIRLfRAAN0IW 11OTOCg00MA•OOIOINIICRLTNI 1101111181188111101118 SIR API@ NOPNNN17f. LARANNLOINIML @ P@MATM 118!11081 Yt1NN1 @AC@ AM ANPNIMNMASMANIR YNATOOKA@MC. 4AYALALY182880L 811811.@ LRNAOTOAN@MIII110RO•Yp{ MOUES OOMOLM110 WCPAD AREAS MMRNC@J iM11@M110NL ►MT. LAMAS /41.119111/1•11111881.0880/ LI @NIAI@NNT @0818100 NmS00CI PNNINANNLLIIIMMIMLNIIA ZIER MITSM RINDDI E .ODw1ONMO.R.MA,MRR IMMIX MSTMlRPARMNMBMEMLLYTNTRIYNDPM I MOYL M IRP@ 4NCIN NICT II LOOM= MID IELMNIST MOW 0AW 08,NICLNNR. LMAIIRATO@ SODOM 811080 @!@R ®18108 80181@8@ 1111N� OF IFM4MPNIIL®1MOVIOY ®NROM 5PNORTO WINO TIE IKID, NOMEWL LMt TIE .101118811111111 ND SINILD@AAMIRM AM M NMMTIIR®1OMDM1 1NILY. LON 888•/101811 OROMAIM,MN MNW or =cum= R•1LMSODNMNO@ P@BMDOMENIBRe NA @WN@T 80D 01080 @ LM IM MO LMN P90/YG W ID M NR@ R LAl70lMSM• LAMM SHOULD @TAIL DOIMOILMTO 811088111 80011ONRAR111I181818MAO0110E8/I811 RD1+Nt4 M800 TM @@ WTMMSOTNATM ML NNMN ®4 RCM 'SLOW KM 1.18 MA@@tl OPAOLWAIL RAMPALL WATER =MO Mi DAY PN,YO POLLMYNO SOD RACNI08T 8811080LNPR FILLONM TINS MUS DAY EITANptNRPM81D.NAT@ABIBNSARR11/1 MORAN MSMATR NOMRON min nourzows. u LMNNNOOOMNON011MTAANTANN1A88 0MBNTOyJNC1@. AM 08180807 @ AT INPlM 11NR=NCO R PNN.Y ROHM. OMMLYTNOTDTHRIN MAP1INS00R1M. LN M=NEU OF C1NClARA11111 PLOWNINUALLY MID FOLLOWS OMAR UMW MAIN DIM SPANM0I18080. PANPiLY. ARCHRECTIENGINEER DEVELOPER P T1iiw1 UCTURAL ENGINEER Fj HOma8 Inearponslal n ha1 .a Z10414-31. OINNER LEC3ACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC a" 143w P 'HLI@ PROJECT MOO PROJECT 80118]1: 000 -00000 MASTER GRADING PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNDLAR@,MDTRISOTA ISSUE w10a - tm wwmu. p REV.THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THUS SHEET SHEET NUMBER: C-2.0 _geenngGOnPoi� a. r Cer1111011I uw. RMf/?RO.awF. I . ANIMMETWOGINIM/PIANNINI la Plant Schedule SCALE: r. 1W Shade Trees Autumn Blaze Maple Northwoods Maple Swamp White Oak Hackberry Skyline Honeylocust Little Leaf Linden Ornamental Trees Pinkspire Crabapple Serviceberry Shrubs Bush Honeysuckle Gro -low Sumac Shrub Rose Roundabout Red Pine Bush Honeysuckle Perennials Little Bluestein Prairie Dropseed Black -eyed Susan Purple Coneflower Butterftyweed Lupine Monorda Sedum Rainwater Gardens Plnkspire Crabapple New England Aster Cardinal Flower Indian Grass Blueflag Iris Little Bluestein ARCHRECTlENRNEER DEVELOPER , 74161Z9 ,w; ,...1��.. i�i!rM��ii Rilw.S Ill" +1. Mr=. MY J. Sner ENOMEER FJ No minion k PPaotw wW sP OWNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC F HUD PROJECT NUMBER: 000 -00000 • MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE I.NDJ.ANBS.JYN¢BOTA ISSUE: II/1a/Ot - tlR .I.RITAI. REV.THISSHEET 0 NO REV. MS MEET SHEETNUNBER C -3.0 RECEIVED NOV 1 0 2.003 CIO OF LINO LAKES ENGNEER .wrr.t.O... W00DS EDGE, LITC PROJECT HUO PROJECT NUMBER: ODO -00000 PRELIMINARY SENOR Lima DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE • ISSuft n /m. 3 - Ct1Y wry 7TN, REVAM axeer O ND REV TIeS aHEEr MEErNUMBER C-4 ■0 LEGEND ALTRI= W n �RIRQ M\L INUN -01 ■OWN PPM �Y VAMP SLT FENCE MOM 7..X411 601 ROCS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE revm ur Warr anTafNrR.NYV BEAM RDm1/NUM4DCM D. RAM Used Per Dana) P. Shwas Be I -Y 51A. lA. A977.040 D-- a /land b A /aasr At trot I Inch. 714th. 711. 4977.7.7. Weld De I81.01 50 Rot b LAn707 And grind 0. At A A1. A. Width Of A. Propose, Rood. IMRLRIIAICC The Rach Pad No* oa. -1.no1 At Alts.. 7. 7177* 1.777 7 0 MN Onto 11.1 Rea. APIA Mqt. P177. Tap X117 RM AdAWnd RAM Or Rq-.1 An/ Yl Of Po Pod. COPYROR TOOK. IOJOTO- 6IIa1R. M. MOMICIP/MNMAMLAMAM MAMA, OI ILUINIBRp9N API APPN11W1E CLIMAAIOR■ NB79Nt7PCP I MPYLA ALL APPROPRIATE MLMICOMPAE/. AND IU7 U1RNACKL PORLOCAIOI Of MRRw1MiN1Y110IAtAYA. ssetaripsEsessiest INAOII SCALE 1'.730' L ALL SLUM OYAIY WAN i1AMMNMSIAW 11NNMYL MEP R .i PST 170AA1 TNMPA AMNTu.iS PIMA LOPES LONTWlli1 MOULD NASA THE SOLIMPFACI MNNLY IIWNw®W RIMYAINROPF ISRLUMW TAMPS PYCN.AT110111!A1ALROPY ELAOY 0111CRAPUG TO PYOMM A HOOD.. SAAIA wVACL AMR TOUR°RADOS MINAS. FOR CI11 IUUPANY1®ILL .. w YNS ILIACLNML110DON0 L ALL SAW K1M ®LRAIIYp COINIINC11011 MMf E NYSOIr =HIM AM 01010 NAM POD OR MOOD NM LAIMPT/ (OR LYRALMRJ.ALLOMREUGAIRASOINYR OPTS SEES NIKPOPSMT MALL EIlMOlp1Y1DNYPAI11Y1APTS RPIDL MOW LMDVIM AMMO Au.MTt 7.q. 1MOIpnJINN SIRLM PLUMP OCRMSAPTMI ANINI LINGI ®IWINANIIIICIOPOP/MI OMEN En IF !Ammo W 110TOCOYIY MTODYRMIUGLRYI SCwNI/ ®ME! ARE NOYSY1R 111YwMLOR OPAL E SPREAD AOMMAIIp 1LIMIA PER WA AIOANC O1MO YIMA/TRA MIfiSiRA1Y LAPO 4AYALALNTOPIOLLW L E lEAD1DAMIIMT1140w00PA PA OOINETN NOWPAAARWNIAAAYONNETENOYY PA0. L AMNKTNw1EMAKOPP OPi/ EYMIE NUR ERRIIORID TMY 100 0. R11Y RLAI1MIi pRLMYAYO} SEEDELIESIESSEDEEN O OYN /sIECONINDIMISIIIIL LAM SOL OUST Y PN@ANI NTE SAEMYGNATR =WPM I®NII.AN won I ewes ma l LWIR ®AN nualvLY PREOP PLUGS. MOMITC. i1111NRA10E 100PwRgOO E PROLJ ®TRMA POUNDS PER lIOLN P O SAPPY iNRLLIIAINTNN ®MYOSIN E 70I RYRtDIAYw11ESOLDNPMI1111MUM lEJO111II91Y ICO IMOLD pLLSA MAUSI, INA9RIW1OIREYOEIIYI WPM. 1.011LOP110Pi1 E •RAI1M, LRMANW OODIIEfMNUG 1701111.110 SOD EAAD E PUGGED waft 011 /1Q aura Y Eau PAOw.SE000RCLDEuiown 7YLNpINGYIBACL.MW 1fM1AIIRROW. L APIETE YO E LAD R IIODN E 1ARp OR ELL ES IO PE04 000000NSACT WPM SOD NO OD6APTMRRMLRIA.IIEIOD SHOULD NI VIAIIRE11110111AVUE MOIL 11DLRMMO AMORDMON Ile WE NW MAIIRAIAMR LNSIMAMMITDOF SFWTI RAllm I7 M I MRLMw 1114 L DAY PMYDPONOMMIAAODPIACEIMPIT 1® SOLI OW. POLIDNRN IPS PIMA IRLYEINIMIR6ITPM N*MATYNNMIlMIR1D P NTAIN AMMAN 110111IMMM1E RODTZMM. LYYM110YM11 DESK MAINTAIN MASI .PI OF SIMNEL AY IMMMgT MI MINIM IRLTYIOD •PRILYR001Yn USUALLY TWIG GPM AMOR PODIA LAIL P. POPE= AMP OF*OHMURA= ROMMI UALLYAND POL OMIAN MOM HOER. RAE II®IIYNIA OWW1 PERRY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DEVELOPER HARTFORD ® aiSrrwo 1 WP- /J-- Pw•.Ar. mud w past r se se q d IMuntM Waft' ./ Y 1 -Iy YAW �i - d�/11. YYst AMYL b11�TOO* a M.7tl11 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HOnuuMk Con=NMG.1 GA- Ip0rY11W Ma MOM .4 I..,SS A IONONST FNIn YIYIr- LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC HUD PROJECT NUMBER: 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE IRALLRESAIRN®OTA E Il /11/97 - AIT MMfL A REV. Ties WEEP 0 NO HEE1)65 MEET BNEET1) t GRADING PLAN SHEETNUNBEIt C -5.0 ® COP1'NO T SRO. MEMO SCUP. EIC ANIDEDS/IDOPRED/PUSPICES RC Noy 1 0 2003 CITY O L4140 LAKES PLANTING NOTES LALL EMNEIEED MERE IDYLL DE SENNA MAW D0ERSNEE MEL AU. EolEDUIN AUW AROUND SERDESDENALL RSODO®. S PLANES S ELLR DMJR AND SS6/VPER 44411ER2 ARSERS osNULL ucermrgam stns OP CLEAN MOLE SSEDOEDEAEDNOODENCN OVER PLUM MEDD GNUS DM AND AMMERTES AMU MALL ER SSSERED EMI UL SI ND. 4 ALLLMDNDIPRAERADSSLLEEMOML L nN LANESCME ARSERLT FOR THE PROS'T SHALL COORDINATE AND NERT van TImar= me WE OOIma= PR BSIAEEFOAl0N TRAERPLMU7 EEL ALLUDES VIABLE FOR TNANSPLANRES.as FLAMED AEDAND STADNPRIORTOANYLCOASnNK77DEACIDITY. PROPOSED 7RARMLANI TREE SOMME MALL L R DUERYOIED EY SSNlYSpMEN TRRTiL ALLONTNl1 ®IO SE MOVED LT ONCITOTNIR PNSLLOCATION AND PRUR7EDTDBRYRYMENNY. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DEVELOPER IME- HARTFORD I- 711. s qw S 1171. =WED Ms d ReE.f.Ay PEER I. Sarwr STRUCTURAL ENGINEER rajNan RN Wt n1. CenwMP i Incorporated PS IMMO. NS MUNN. MP OWN. WC PIN /NJ 111.0.1.111 OWNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC MO PROJECT NUMBOC 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNDUE" IIINNESIOIA ISSUE: It ACAS _ CRY SWIMS p REV. TM MEET 0 NO REV. TN a SHEET �T MBER C -8.0 e eenwma m- NMaal- Waft .e..xamI s/O.Wlms /nlrxws RETAIL SPACE - 23 TOTAL SPACES TOTAL CROSS AREA. 50.703 SO.FT. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE:I /16" CENED NOV 1 0 2003 cat 0 040 LAKES ARICHRECTIENINNEEE i. DEVELOPER rijk. HARTFORD 14* add Id ft m3' m m .4 .rrI fa °+` w e. a 2 ragCTURAL ENGINEER F. 1 Hanuaekak Co: -Mania Meorperaled aw0y ee aeat -ems - A{, ieFW -WI O LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLD PROJECT 1000 PROJECT NUMBER: 000 -00000 PREUMINARY REGENT AT UNO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT, AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNOLA0B6,MlN?00MA ISSUE: II /:o/a - an avow REILTNIS tow 0 No REV. TM! SHEET SHEET MAVBER A1.1 . COarala 2004 Warbe MOM% MC MWI.eR,O1 R,NAMON TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS - 38 TOTAL GROSS AREA 50.342 SOFT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/1.• = 1• -0• ECE VED NOV 102003 CITY Y Or LINO LAKES ARCHITECT/MIME= DEVELOPER HARTFORD IIMEIDEW VaStriraZra 1 bray ul/ V 1. . ii r MbM� 'Y �.:wr z odor - Mr Y r IAn1 MOWN. b. hIR STRUCTURALENmIEER Nonuuhok �r Ina Nolod ,MONKra 111:10 W.7 Fab bambaammaus OWtiER LEGACY EALLC r fl. PROJECT HUD PROJECT NUNSER: 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT. AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINOLA4*0*MNHS0OTA ISSUM 14/10/03 - e14Y ROHR REY.TFSS SHEET 0 HD ROAMS SHEET SHEETTDIE: OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUI&BEft A1.2 STRUCTURALENGt EER X _hak MearperWtl ■ ■■ wswiw�w • iuu aer -.r-rn WOCDr�S EDGE, AT LLLCC M.MH,Y PROJECT 1100 PROJECT MULE& 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOP AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE NHOIASISS M187ESOTA ISSUE: uNOPoJ - art IavRW REV. THIS SHEET O HO HEV. TINS SHEET SHEET HUMBER: A1.3 FOURTH FLOOR. PLAN STRUCTURAL. ENQEJEER Can Consultants o. * h Incorporated a aaais a 00004 MC i u araran LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC ,ar.r PROJECT HUD PROJECT NUMBER: CBB -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOP AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LJNOGRBB,MWNESO A ISSUE: 11/tONJ - CRP M•RM Q REV. THIS SLEET p NO REV. THIS MET SHEET NUMB Al.4 1611,- �l��,�Ole 1Il it �' II" usam ■ ■■m,�� 11111!Iv 11 II s�>1i111 � .11 .16,16■■■ _� t1Y►_ u1 u1 II- U■ ■IUU11.u1■■ .. 1., ..- .. ..11. ■ ■ ■ lu!U ■!!!! !!.!!u. 11 ■111 ■U_ '•11.1.1. .11.11.- {'`� , .r •■I11III fl• -I (mill 1U11111'.1...I.. .•.iii.. ii iii.. __■ , - ■ II MIMI ■ ■1111 u ■u11'11 ■1 ■ ■. umu uwu i■ ■i a ■i1Rnruul ■ ■I ■ ■ NW11111■ ■•11■■ ■ ■. uwu =uwu ■ :; 111111!!! .l ..wn =..w.. A 1616 _u.■1u -nm... -I1 ■I 11 ■!'�' - Woman", 11 u■ 11 " 1:0 11111 X11.1■ ! °_11 .1.11 -- comma 2201. name amour. .1G VIEW OF BUILDING FROM PARK _ SCALE:1/16' - V -0' - . [1it1IIl1itftl111i.1t1,:1a:._ -•1111111111111111111110- 11 m 11 11 111 ■. 11 111.. 111111 IV 11 u■ ■I 11 u. ■1 1. 0..1 AS ■.. ■ um 11 1■ 111 11 11 1111 II 11 111 11 .1 111 11 . 11 111 1111 I 1 11 11 11 NUNN 11• • mom IMMO . 1616 NHL w u 1616■.. `= I,111111',IIi�IIII11 llj'II` - -1 11 `:iii 93VEL a 9GIVa. uii 11 .11 .1 11.111 .1 11 ..■ 11 11 111 11 un■o 11 BIM 11 11 .1. 1. 1616..... 11 1111 II 1111111 11111 1. .. ■1■ 1. u■uu .1 111 .1 11 111 11 .1 111 .1 ■■ ■u 11 11 ■O ■. 11 p. 11 ..... 11 ■ •.• 11 11 11■ 11 111 11 11 1 11...1. 11 MIMI 11111•°, LJ1111111• ■1111111• L ■1; 1 1 i' 1. ■ i N IIO IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII!I111111 II IIIIIIII 1.. . • .t1 • _ 111111111111111 �,�;�!i4•1 16 16 . 1�mll ,lll'Illf�fl'I'IIIIIIIl1��Ipl/ � ■.c.r..nn..uma I. }lla` . ■. / / ■■11■ril I6- 111G11.1111114111111 =4 ■r -el:V ■11111mill ..1111. lulu .. Ion u■■111■/1 uu!n1 - -111111111E - .■�11® 1616..... vun m1■■IU11I■■ ■\1111.11"1.■ ■111.11 •• ■•••• 11.1E iiii : ■1 ■ii i1 1111111....111 ........ ..1 n n i1..,R111111.. I1:1 1111111 Ili' 1 .1 1111.= RECEIVED NOV 1 0 2003 CITY OF LINO t LAKES ARCFITECTI.IISRIEER DEVELOPER NEMMI r 'wi10°rn 11001, ea101/016Ww. -- O " W ftwl up ++Fume .. S' 1.�`.``m .rr...... 11.1ns .1. .■.1610 110.1111 Nam 10101116 A• .R! STRUCTURAL ENGINEER .,..,..16.»11 OWNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC PROJECT I.W PIOJECT MINIM 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPM AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE ISSUE: 11/10/03 - 01Y 11w1. A REV THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. TW. a■Er !SHEET NUNEER: A3.0 [1IJ11 ;I�IIIII':_ 1 i, ;IIIiII! _tall, ��.' IL 11111! ilil�ulII1I111Ii11��1�11�' 1�1 ,111% 1 1 VIEW OF BUILDING FROM PARKING LOT 1tilllil '111TH I'CIJllilti, . 111•1 11 11 11•1 11 1111111 IL III 11 1. 1111111'.11111_ 11 .1 IIfII' 11111 11111 11. 1.11111 .. 111 .1 1111111: ® comma 2113. 11111no1M 0no1■. MC. 111..11 ■I.1111 11 111 11 ■I 111 11 -11 111 11 -1I 111 11 1111111 -II n•1 MI 11 .1. 1. 11 111 11 1.ill I■_ ■111111 11 i111.- ■1111 1I 1111..11 -1I III 11 A :::: 1111 II 11 "" 11111111 Iill111111111111111111,11111111111111111 illi!I'� it I I II [ 1'1 I I I I I� �� II'I'LI lii':41I� 111 ilI ARLNTE CTEiGN EER _ DevoOPEe I magittnes rararnst aey Y N. = m 4•w. I.1- Mir HOW =VP 11 be Mb INC 1 Row STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Nunuuhok ConuNonh Incorporated M mama cc e.uo�aaaiM OWNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLD W ■ 1 li PROJECT HUD PROJECT NUMBER 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR DYING DEVELOP AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE IJNOIALEI,3@0.1001 CITY OF LINO LAKE:: ISSUe: 1I/10,03 - C111 INCH 0 REEnes SHEET 0 N REV. Tun SIEET SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A3.1 1;11Pla��yi:utll 1 "'111111 w ■ ■■ ■ scHACt I ■.. 111 L ❑ - �1ICON o ��II■• o■I W� ��■�L-�_ .�X 124 ,d1116 ��1►�l� is �!a i... M —II ■7u..7 ��SIEI,��SE ■�IIELI�� =.IIEI I ■■ UI u■uu an MI ■I.. ■...■ ■I■ ■AEI ICI ■7.0 ■7 a u. u_I■ URE'�E■■■■ ■� uwu —nwu —_ ill■ _ - u.0 u u u■ n '■I ■:IEESE ■I ■ ■IIE11■ - - -_ EISI,111 Inn Ell ARCHRECTENSINEER DEVELOPER HARTFORD 7•.M .+r Y W 7k..w.■7i W�M�.1.Ywtl STRUCTURAL ENGINEER incorperoOE 1 21M13/111N St • 0m sr-rn OMB LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LIZ ungeWiTIce ZATAWBOI PROJECT HUD PROJECT NUMBER 000-00000 PREUNINARY REGENT AT UNO LAKES SENIOR LIVING DEVELOPMENT AT LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LMOGI®d,MRiitlOTA ISSUE: )7 /10/07 - 07! Woof REV.INS SHEET O N *REST= SHEET SHEET NUMBER: A3.2 00•111.1. 2065. 1 AVIUM IIiiiiii11111 .1,i _ •IIR�II•i• am Be minim •.11111pen!!!! !_ _. =II.111•E MEM II ■I 11111 ■11111■an's ■1■11 .11..1. e___ 11mi••1 e1111 —ii ii nil- -. ■I 1111.611111 1111B. n on n n MIMI no IN in my 1111 ■I11.um onus 11 us ■:_ �■11111rtuu 1111 •••1.11 ■ 111111■ /. 1■1.111 1Won .n. eitornaarentaindotar{MI.. • — :I liIUllltilt#Bt(III t--J ;r:.1 ,IIIItIRlUHIUIlIii VIEW OF WESTSIDE OF BUILDING 3 scA1.E:1 /1' - 1 -0' 1 ra ��u !IlIIII:I:GIt�it ,;', �i 1 ii ilI�I,4■1 / 111111111.11 ■■ I I U i 11 ..1 1 BM AV 1 • .1 1 11 •1 uuln -■uu u— 11111'.1 1■.. ■11 11 111 11 ■1111 11 Ell 11111 mem I1�11! l!![!! 5- ■11l■1i611 Nil 1111i 11 .1 11111111111111 ::9RU2a9GN�1C41H111111l1111 • • 1111 11 111 II 1111'1■ 11.1 1■ 11 111 11 11 ■.1' ■ 1 ■■ ■n 11 ■■ ■11 // 1O 11 II 11 1.1 11 1111..11 ■.111 ■1 11 w • ■L■I�■i — ■L■ ■J■ RN it •i IaJ11 it IZI u®� *Iola llII[1.1li r1- �rlil% !!111% 1I .IIIIlII1I ilift STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Fj. Coehok Consultants incorporated elra. • Mt 701-111111.631 • 4111104 OWNER LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE, LLC 1r '■�i'1a... a1''i1�i. PROJECT NOD PROJECT NUMBER, 000 -00000 PRELIMINARY REGENT AT LINO LAKES SENIOR UVING DEVELOPMEP• AT • LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE ll1/OL.RBI,mairs .rA ISSUE: 11/10/11 - .m ROW/ REV. ins SIEET 0 NO REV. Tons sum ewer NUMBER: A3.3 LEGACY AT WOOD EDGE Pervious/Impervious Coverage: this development will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development, so the percent of pervious /impervious surface is not held to any set figure. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance does note the following guidelines for PUDs in Section 2, subd. 10: • Residential: a minimum of 50% of land subdivided for development shall be reserved as common open space. • Commercial or Industrial: the PUD design will result in greater landscaped pervious area than the base zoning district standard. (Note: the following are Zoning District impervious /pervious requirements: Residential: 65% impervious, 35% pervious Neighborhood & Limited Business: 65% impervious, 35% pervious General Business: 75% impervious, 25% pervious Light & General Industrial: 85% impervious, 15% pervious) As noted in the narrative for the proposed project, "Legacy at Woods Edge includes the open space elements proposed in the City /Calthorpe Plan, including a 1.5 -acre park in the center of the site, a 1 -acre park south of the senior building, and the wooded wetlands on the south, southeast, and east borders. Most of the area in the southeast quadrant remains woods and wetlands." Parking Requirements: it should be noted that plans for the site are still preliminary in nature, and so square footage totals for building space and number of parking stalls are subject to change. Requirements per Ordinance: Proposed for Site: • • "Retail Store & Service • • Retail: buildings 6 & 7 contain 50,703 Establishment ": at least 1 off - street sq.ft. of retail space (first floor), with approx. 150 parking stalls immediately surrounding the buildings, and further common parking available. Multi - Family: buildings 6 & 7 contain parking space for each 200 sq.ft. of floor area. "Townhome" or "Multiple Family Dwellings ": at least 2.25 spaces per unit. In projects involving 8 or more units, City may require additional clustered guest parking spaces. approx. 150,00 sq.ft. of residential space, comprising 114 units (2x1- 4th floors), with underground parking provided (number of stalls not available at this time). Lighting Requirements: lighting fixtures for the site will be similar to those used at the Marketplace complex on the other side of 35W. Further details not yet available. No NOWT /D Luminaire The DMS10 luminaire consists of a spun and cast - aluminum exterior housing with large built-in cast - aluminum mounting adaptor/heat sink and flat, spun - aluminum skirt. It can accommodate ballasts up to 400W. When used with a decorative luminous ring (LR option) or luminous dome (LD option) the 250W or 400W ballasts must be remote in the mounting or pole base. The lens assembly,thanksto silicone gaskets along the lens and frame, keeps the housing watertight and is secured by two quarter -turn captive screws. The (ens pivots, providing easy access to the lamp and/or ballast. Lamp Guide DMS20j40 Wattage DMS10/30 DMS10/30 Options LDILR 70 MH 100 MH 175 MH 250 Mil 400 Mil* 35 HPS 50 HPS 70 HPS 100 HPS 150 HPS 250 HPS 400 HPS* • • • • Remote ballast in mounting or pole base. * Consult factory as this wattage requires a remote ballast in a special pole base. 400 MH must use a reduced jacket lamp. DMS10 a, DMS20711, DMS30TM and DMS4O luminaires accommodate H.I.D. or incandescent lamps as shown in the above table. The UL or CSA- recognized CWA -type ballast features a -30F ( -34C1 lamp- starting capacity, a power factor of 90% or better and a regulation of lamp within t10% of rated input voltage. HPS ballasts operate within ANSI trapezoidal limits. The luminaire's lens frame, secured by two captive quater -turn screws, pivots along an hinge to permit easy lamp and/or ballast access. The ballast is integrated in the hood of the luminaire, on a unitized ballast tray, or is remote in the mounting or the pole base. Ordering Sample Similar to the DMS10,the DMS30 is distinguished by its bell- shaped spun - aluminum skirt. The DMS20, on the other hand, features a smaller mounting adaptorthan the DMS10, accepts ballasts of no more than 175W and is not available with the LD and LR options. The DMS40 is similar to the DMS30 except for its smaller mounting adaptor. lt accepts ballast up to 175W only and is not available with the LD and LR options. DMS1O, DINS* DMS30 and DMSM luminaires are UL and CSA approved Optical Systems SG optics Segmented cut -off reflector system set in faceted arc - image duplicating patterns SG1: Asymmetrical (I) SG2: Asymmetrical (II) SG3: Asymmetrical (III) SGO: Symmetrical (V) 21/16" 0 I.D. (52 mm) z n . of C N 24" (610 mm) EPA : 1.00 sq.ft Weight : 40 Ibs (18.1 kg) DMS10 Mountings IF A 180° bent section of extruded aluminum 23/8" (60 mm) O.D., mechani- cally assembled to the side of a pole. • Accepts no ballast. 180° bent section of uded aluminum 23/8" mm) 0.D., welded to ast- aluminum pole aptor and a flat rolled uminum spiral. • 2 ballasts, max. 175W (1,./)JI SGFM: Forward -throw (Gear lamps not included) SE optics Small hydro - formed cut-off reflector system set in faceted arc -image duplicating patterns are also available in type III, IV and V distributions. Please consult factory for details. For further information, refer to the Photometric Guide. A23/8" (60 mm) round aluminum arm welded to a 41/2" (114 mm) O.D. pole adaptor. The moun- ting is complete with two bent decorative rods, spheres and a cast -alu- minum luminaire adaptor. • 2 ballasts, max. 1751N. 0 NM A 180° bent section of extruded aluminum 23/8" (60 mm) O.D., with cast - aluminum decorative spirals, and a pole adap- tor. The mounting slip fits into a 4" (102 mm) pole. • Accepts no ballast. OM 1 i Two straight 1 5/8" (41 mm) O.D. aluminum side -arms welded to a 4" (102 mm) round aluminum pole adaptor and to a cast- aluminum luminaire adaptor. • 2 ballasts, max. 100W. Lamp 100 HPS Luminaire Optical System Voltage Mounting & Configuration DMS30 SG3 120V IF-1A Pole R80 -15 Finish Options GN -TX FS -LD Lumec reserves the right to substitute materials or change the manufacturing process of its products without prior notification. 21/16'0 LD. (52 mm) r1 21/W H I.D. (52 mm) 1-1 21/16' B I.D. (52 mm) I-1 9 o =I �E ' — m w �(4 C EPA: 0.87 sq.ft. Weight :38 Ibs (18.3 kg) DMS20 Mountings PM A 90° bent section of extruded aluminum, 23/6" (60 mm) 0.D., welded to two 1" (25 mm) extruded alumi- num arms,two decorative adaptors and a 4" (102 mm) round pole adaptor. • 2 ballasts, max. 100W. p A 23/8" (60 mm) O.D. alu- minum arm welded to a 4" (102 mm) round pole adap- tor and a cast- aluminum luminaire adaptor, with decorative half- sphere. A structural 1/2" (13 mm) rod is welded to the arm and pole adaptor. • 2 ballasts, max. 100W. Configurations -o 1A o—o op 2 2A olo c-to 3 3B 4 EPA: 1.00 sq.ft Weight : 40 lbs (18.1 kg) DMS30 Poles 25" (635 mm) EPA:0.87 sq.ft. Weight : 36 Ibs (16.3 kg) DMS40 E rE Finishes 16 Standard Colors Available 12 aes The specially- formulated textured (TX) or non - textured Lumital powder coat is available in a range of 16 standard to colors. This unique coating of thermo- aia setting polyester resins provides a highly- durable UV- resistant exterior finish as per ASTM G7. Lumital coatings are specially formulated for outstanding salt-spray resistance according to ASTM B117 standards. s All surfaces are chemically treated using 1113 a four -step (aluminum) or seven -step (steel) process prior to painting. Consult Lumec for complete specifications. 244 4 1.22 2 SCL Special Color (liquid) SCP Special Color(powder) Provide a 4" (102 mm) square color chip. 0.61 It is possible to order smaller minimal quantities of powder paint at a pre- mium. Your representative will be able n to tell you if a powder coat paint can be developed for your project. Please note that where quantities do not warrant it, Lumec reserves the right to use an oven -cured liquid polyurethane finish. APR4 APR4 & LBC2 D bOtS BC:63/4' BC:63/4' (171 mm) 1171 mm) BC:101/2' BC: 121/2 1267mm) 1318 mm) Consult the Pole Guide for details and the complete line of poles. Options FS HS DL LD Luminaire integrated fuse House shield Polycarbonate drop lens Luminous dome (DMS10and 30 only) LB Luminous ring (DMS10 and 30 only) HB Hinged base (APR4&APS4 poles only) DR" Duplex receptacle (120 volts only) GR* Duplex receptacle with ground fault interrupter (120 volts only) PH Photoelectric cell LS" Provision for loudspeaker outlet BA* Banner arm IP Interior paint (pole only, consult factory for applicable poles) LBC Optional base cover * Consult factory for feasibility with cast - aluminum shafts. Base cover for APR4 & SPR4 poles only (replace standard base cover). Registered Lumec inc. Agenda Item 5B Environmental Board Meeting Date: December 3, 2003 Topic: Marshan Townhomes 2 "d Addition Background: Marshan Lake Townhomes Phase 1 was approved in 1995. Phase 2 of Marshan Lake Townhomes consists of 46 proposed attached units on a 4.05 acre site. The land area of the proposed development is zoned R4 High- Density Residential. Attachments: 1. Site Map Schoell & Madson, Inc. 2. Preliminary Plat Marshan Lake Townhomes 3. Stormwater Letter 4. Surface Water 5. Grading /Drainage /Erosion Control 6. Tree Preservation Plan 7. Landscape Details 8. Landscape Plan 9. MLCCS 10. City Planning, Marshan Townhomes 2 "d Addition /Parking, Impervious /Lighting. Analysis: Marshan Townhomes 2 site is in an area designated as a Lake Protection Zone in the Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. This means that extra care should be given to the management of surface water recources in this area. Protection zones are preexisting environmental conditions and should be shown on the existing conditions page. It is not shown. The MLCCS should also be shown on the existing conditions page. Please see MLCCS (Attachment 9). The MLCCS indicates "Short Grasses and Mixed Trees with 26 -50% impervious." There are no rare plant or potential rare plant on the site. The site consists of 90197.99 SF Impervious, and 50922.98 pervious. This amounts to 56 % pervious according to the developers letter (Attachment 2,10). Water flows to a created pond on the east side of the townhome complex. Surface water calculations for the pond were designed to include the entire site build -out. A Tree Preservation Plan is submitted as Attachment 6. All internal trees are proposed for removal. A tree preservation area is shown on the Lake Drive side of the property. Three elms shown as save trees should be removed. One of the elms is dead and the other two trees are hazards. There are 4 ash trees on the NW side of lot 2 that might be saved. The proposed grading plan shows a drainage swale in this area. The city engineer should look at this to see if the grading can be modified to save the trees. A landscape plan is included in this packet as Attachment 8. We require 1 boulevard tree per city street frontage per unit. The developer should escrow dollars to cover this cost. The developer is planting many more trees on the proposed lots. Placement of the trees on platted lots should give enough room to place the City boulevard trees in an area free of underground utilities. Suggested changes in species include: • Change Black ash to Green ash or one of the native oak species. • Colorado spruce to White spruce • Austrian pine to White or Red pine. • Autumn applause to Northern pin oak. Parking seems to exceed the required number of stalls by 80 (Attachment 9) There is no lighting plan submitted yet. Options: 1. Recommend approval with suggested staff and Environmental Board changes and comments. 2. Recommend not approving Recommendation: Option 1 Environmental Board Comments: ***4144"1 get i ..f.r 5)„....i,j4:_ft••,\.:,-,., .4.-3 // / **441b*/* , - . a. , , , s Z, 14 A ,..4.14:),- ,.• -, .: .(i/e- 1.141--...). ......4 1 / / et* iii ii 43 ',I. II ll MA rill Pt, 1,, ,.,..v.,..-t ":„..,::1- )., 1:::1 x /I , ININ - / - i ..T.I.:•:. ..,z0.4j,.... , i • !--• --,, / t , -• '. // / arlt* m r IN rai ... -../ ), .s. .....r 4...,.:. .0 , , 1 I ort-fil.;-z . fl..,.,., 4,..; / . 1,, ,, 1.4472,,,,/. „ 4 .:,,,,,r,,,ir.„,,, , ..f:. -4,' '` 1J` °r•, x.11/ i t. /; q • 1 loIHVITPUN 1111111r i j; ' 111/44, „.•••,,.., ::,f,,....:,444 i ,k111141pIllAryit , I . 1 / tblm ITN .7r::::, . -, . _77,- e: , k"' 1 / w*vit, w I if 1 1 Ea 0 ,iniiiii■J,E oils._ 7 174. ik lirill, � � I rrt"� -/' 1 `{�C1'`.. • f i i ; ; � �1 / e�l, , (1 I I 12 U•Ul' PLAN /I , ,' ire rillItiblir will 1 i ins mmIen 1 1 • •-•••• '. -i--- ' . L4Z...., .., I ' f , I I il.li.,11111 111 Mb 111111%111A- elid Fit II .r.,.,,iirl_ ir.,,,,,,,,,, ..... Yi -` 14UdTPLAN m.■oWww,.r,euogm.w AQUA LANE 11 =slim SIIE PLAN Sf1E PLAN RECEIVD • •wiMM.RM ■r.. Rim . maul. YMMR■MM�Yy /�w4 •PPM MOIPPw■• / /�rM�A w t 'XIS.. M. Ms.r •i:%ii w■+w. YM■{�w M ■.■r■ • .�wu'� iii .. rre�i1v1�Ofi ''ywwr�isi.m..n •�RMYr..p..M1.M.R.Ab . NOV 1 9 jFUNOIs : any 10610101 IMP . . e*Iiiel HOKANSON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP °1` PPM ST. M MARSHAN. LAKE TOWN HOMES #2 � p _. MANION Mai pmi 7M4177 40URNAM.. rn,cn�ia.w,.. DATE: 10-28-03 P por.w,. REVISION- 11-18 -03 i{�m6�r girfiat.rfi z CIRCLE 0018'08"W 0 POV1r6YJ6 A9 5'R bTYP 206 0) Vi ■ ■ 0 z N D: 0 N U 4) 0 v 41.1.1 ~ `` E. Line f the T, 31 BUILDTNeeSE rfilki t. Lot 2, Sec. Public Street 40 ft. min P Street (Non - arterial) - 30 ft. min u - 30 ft. min RIVA SIDE (Bu 18 ft min 25 ft min GROSS AREA: 176,361.76 sq. ft. 4.05 acre NET AREA 176,361.76 sq. f t. 4.05 acrr, e" Zoned: R -4 Guide Pion: Med Density Request to Reguide to High Density SITE DENSITY: TOTAL UNITS = 46 NET DENSITY = 46/4.05 = 11.36 UNITS /ACRE DESCRIPTION: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 2 of /1 • 54.52 • Lu cri N CO lirr P°1."?? e y/4 O f fr., n• ` OS s to fe �L b Oke un, FIvQ LEGEND il fgf"'Qy N: — —�1•?3 — — DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR — — DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK Sal Type ': ZMA, ZMB = Zinnernar/ pA Snn Y�f 87.02 00°18'08 "E cn t LOT AREAS: LOT /BLK 1/1 Area 32,88225 sq. Ft. 0.75. acres LOT /BLK 2/1 Area 32,093.33 sq. Ft. 0.74 ocres LOT /BLK 3/1 Area, 35,290.83 sq. ft. 0.81 acres LOT /BLK 4/1 Area 76,105.63 sq. ft. 1.75 ocres BENCHMARK: Top Nut Hydrant in N.W. quodra of the intersection of Aqua Lone and uo Circle. Elevation = 897.27 feet (N.G.V.. 1929) P1 0 e4 a- • • OCR Loo 0 1CNe r 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 E_• a .g0 m» a • Mfg 0v• °C 0v • c is m X o Cs 9 0 m E J nit 0 CITY OF LINO LAKES EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. G. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE SITE AND INSTALL UTILITIES. 1` 4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABIUZED WITH SEED. 500 OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. AU. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY. AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS WARN • TRAC SHALL CON +F ALL UNOE TS, PIPES, MANHOLES. TURES BE ORE DIGGINI EPLACE ABOVE WH�N • e CONSTR -CTION AT NO COST TO ER EPA IRINI R. ITIES 3LES, URIED OR STORM SEWER SEE UTIUTY PLAN STORM SEWER EE UTILITY PLAN 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. EROS! FENC N CONTROL 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY TH CONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS SHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED EXISTING STREETS AND. PAVED AREAS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS 0001 8'08 "W 11. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES AFTER EACH. RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAIUNC FENCES. 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. 4. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REOUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE. PREPARED. AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING GAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA: 651- 454 -0002 OR TOLL-FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1 1`6.` 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILJTIES ANO TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT / ` ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. [j,LC't 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOL ENCOUNTERED ON j.� • THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL�JD_(�• "�^�,•_ OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT^� G 146 S: (CONT). LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION 12. TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT-TO EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO 13. AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. FIN ISH ND AND SOD EL BELOW FL00k^it,�VATI0N. SLOP OF 6" IN-40-FM 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERBMLCov't. CONTROL �up�. & ERQ,SI CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FO ING AND SLOPIN GROUND SURFACE TTOQ� PROVIDE, SSMOO NIFORM DAIS%. CAAIfE�CTEIiRQjf THCTOJ8fUILQINC REQUIRED. EIS 14) FENCE CONTROL • - ESE WFHI IT , ... 4$4 N 0° T PONDING LOVIDE OWER t T9.GRADING PLANS ARE 54 52 6. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION, PAVEMENTS AND CUR AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. CONTACT ARCHITECT IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED. SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 7. AU. EXCESS MATERIAL. BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS. AIL ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF CONSTRUCTION SITE. ` ASTA ,Ig�15. INLL GUA TER. MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB ND T LEGEND DENOTES BOUNDARY UNE DENOTES DRAINAGE/ UTIUTY EASEMENT DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATERMAN DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING. DENOTES EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT 8. COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS. BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION ANO LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 9. REFER TO THE ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND SITE LAYOUT. 10. REFER TO UTIUTY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN. WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING AND STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 11. THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. -' - 996 EXISTIN Cj19Tc R --99 PROPOSED' DWJ1e f Of w^ �,-� U) - 0131:30 ODO000DO* EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE ORMIMEEETEEra PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PnVArk 1.00X: PERCENT OF GRADE PERCENT OF GRADE + vas PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION SOG DENOTES CURB CUT CONSTRUCTION. SAWCUT BITUMINOUS FOR CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS. RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. DENOTES SLAB ON GRADE if • I RECEIVED NOV 1 9 2003 Ci7Y OF LINO LAKES 0 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Es. N • • o eg 3d gI" •i Wes• =N° Z• a .4 0. [10'5 ZCZ <C 40 •42 00 CIZ ZO ST:1 05 F <O 10W M m E �• 0..4e 0 iSi ma 6 ail°. I C3 sig 0. • O Z m 8 • 1r8 I 41 N 00 SILT FENCE TO RUN JUST NEXT TO TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) INSTALL TREE 1312 SIGNS ALONG TREE PRESERVATION (TYP) A, 4 o.kkbie 00° SW. Cor. of Gov't. Lot 2, Sec. 20, fritakirovi.7rG TREE 1FcEp Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter in inches, three feet above ground level. The second number if any) denotes the number of trunks at that location (1 denotes a deod tree). Number following shrubs denotes it's diameter in feet. Denotes deciduous tree. (CD Denotes shrub. Denotes coniferous tree. 0""v•—• Denotes tree line. Example: BE.8.2 87.02 00°1808"E _ IV" Ofis t1-8 54.52 „STA 1.44kei -?; — ight of u.11 tine of ,4ake Driv A Denotes Ash HC Denotes Horse Chestnut AV Denotes Arbor Vitae IR Denotes Ironwood BF Denotes Balsam Fir JU Denotes Juniper BA Denotes Basswood Denotes Birch BE Denotes Box Elder BN Denotes Butternut BU Denotes Bush CA Denotes Catalpa CR Denotes Cedar CH Denotes Cherry CN Denotes Cottonwood DG Denotes Dogwood KC Denotes Kentucky Coffee U Denotes Lilac LO Denotes Locust IA Denotes Mople UP Denotes Hugo Pine O Denotes Oak PI Denotes Pine PO Denotes Poplor RO Denotes Russian Olive SM Denotes Silver Mople EL Denotes Elm SP Denotes Spruce FR Denotes Fruit TD Denotes Tree Deciduous GN Denotes Gingko TE Denotes Tree Evergreen H Denotes Hockberry WA Denotes Walnut WI Denotes Willow .LEGF.110 Denotes tree removal Denotes tree preserved Denotes tree preservation limits RECEIVED NOV 1 9 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 0 11( 30 60 80 SCALE IN FEET 0 0 44 —e Q 1- tO 0 4: E a • I:« « • mfr. • : • 31 fp •2= e • je 5 0 Z co 1 I. 1 e 0 • V r =GENERAL NOTES L LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (454 -0002) PRIOR TO STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATIONS WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 3. WHERE EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUBS MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE DRAWING OR NOT. THEY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED AND /OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED, ANY QUESTION REGALING WHETHER PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL, 4. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD (U000 AND DAMAGED OR RUBBING BRANCHES. 5. BB TREES AND SHRUBS ARE BALLED AND BURLAPED. 6. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK AND FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGUTATION 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON -GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OUNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. l0. WARRANTY FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. IL CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE WITH ALL REPLACEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OUNER CENTER TREE UPRIGHT IN PIT 1 =11 11 u II 11=ii 11=111 -11=11=11=. _ !�11 1111 =11=1 -11-11-11-11- , 11 -11- 11=11= s= =11=11=11=11=11:. � ' 11=11=11=1=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11 nN11.1 1I�1 =11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=.111=.11=11="11- , 11 ➢ =I1- ..11 1L=IL =11 :11 =11 111=11 =11 11 =,1� 11 ,11 11E11l ,11- .IIL 11. IL 11.E -11 ali:11 1L-. 11= FASTEN TREE TO 14 GUAGE PLIABLE ZINC COATED WIRE CONNECTED TO BLACK RUBBER BANDS (BUT NOT THROUGH). SECURE ALL ENDS FIRMLY AND NEATLY. STAKING (OPTIONAL) 2 "X2 "X9' WOOD STAKE 14 GUAGE PLIABLE WIRE 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO 6" OUTSIDE OF STAKE CIRCUMFIRENCE LAWN OR PLANTING BED EARTH SAUCER (3)2 "X2 "X24" LONG FIR STAKES PLANTING MIXTURE -SEE SPEC 6° LAYER OF PEA ROCK UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUE:GRADE NOTES • IT 15 THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • STAKING METHODS TO BE.APPROvED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. • NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. • SCARIFY BOTTOM 4 SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING. ODECIDUOUS TREE NTS = PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS L PLANTING BED PREPARATION: ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10'. AMENDMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED AFTER CULTIVATION. 2. BACKFILL SOIL: USE SOIL EXCAVATED FROM PLANTING HOLES AND PROVIDE AMENDMENTS. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS INCLUDING ROCKS LARGER THAN 3" DIAMETER 3. FERTILIZATION: ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER SPECIFIED FERTILIZER- MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. MULCH MATERIAL: AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. MASS MULCH ALL PLANTING BEDS TO 3" DEPTH OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIvE 3' DEEP 51-1REDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER ALL EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES TO RECEIVE 3' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. 5. TREE STAKING: IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO STAKE AND /OR GUY THE TREES ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS. IT 15 THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE EVERY STEP NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND 51-4RUBS IN AN UPRIGHT AND PLUMB CONDITION AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE END OF THE PLANT GUARANTEE PERIOD ESPECIALLY WI-ERE VANDALISM, SOIL OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM. STAKING METHODS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE DETAILS AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. TREE WRAPPNG: WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR TI-115 PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12 -1 AND REMOVE ALL RAPPING AFTER 5 -L 1. RODENT PROTECTION: PROVIDE ON ALL TREES, EXCEPT CONIFERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. a PLANTING PLAN: ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED CAREFULLY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OvER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 5. > EDGING: ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE EDGING PLACED BETWEEN MULCH AREA AND ANY ADJACENT TURF AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ANCHOR ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 -14OUR PERIOD AFTER INSTALLATION. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE THEN WATERED WEEKLY, OR MORE IF NECESSARY, DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. II. ALL PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. VS 1l y ILt� 11111 1L a I =� X1.1 :11=1 I 1 0' 11=II= -. I U I 11 JI -II II 11 1=11 lI1L 1L llr -11 =1 - n�ll�u =tt =n �Ln =tr= tt5u= lr�tl= LAWN OR PLANTING BED 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO DRIPL INE SAUCER PLANT MIXTURE SEE SPEC UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" LAYER OF PEA ROCK NOTES: • IT 15 THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR I5 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • STAKING METHODS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLANTING. • NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. • SCARIFY BOTTOM 4 SIDES OF PIT. PRIOR TO PLANTING. 0 CONIFEROUS TREE =PLANTING NOTES 2. 3. ittnIvifose44-1- NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HA5 BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY AND ALL DIGGING.. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE. THEY SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHOULD ANY ADJUSTMENTS BE ADVISED. 5. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. 6. ONE SHRUB PER TYPE AND SIZE IN EACH PLANTING BED AND EVERY TREE SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE. 1. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL. SLAB, CURB, ETC. 8. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:l OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. S. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. 10. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION NOTES L LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A SHOP DRAWING ILLUSTRATING AN IRRIGATION PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER. 2. VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LOCATION. 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL SOD/SEED AND PLANTING AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL BE 100% IRRIGATED. THE IRRIGATION SHALL NCLUDE THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE AND BACK OF CURB WHERE NEW LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED. 4. ITSHALL BE 114E LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, NCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 5. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OLLNER W114 A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 3 LAYER OF 5HREDDED HARDWOOD MULCI-L LANDSCAPE FABRIC -SEE SPEC PLANT MIXTURE -SEE SPEC LINE OF PLANTING PIT WHEN PLANTED INDIVIDUALLY EDGER -SEE SPEC JF, 111_ c =.-: 1 11j11: 11-=111111 ===6' `�r,*l[ II' =Tr=nzJr III11 Blur IL=IL =SI =11 -11 7 1,�-- JI- 11 =11= IL =I --I 11=1=1 1111 = II-,11 =11 =1L II-11 II- 11=f=71=11 1-11=1-1=-11-11-1 ll=il 11.61 -1 =11 11. 111:11.115 LAWN OR PAvED SURFACE UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: • HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING (TYP). • SCARIFY BOTTOM 4 SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING. O SI -IRUS NTS NTS RECEIVED ,f NOV 1 9 2003 s CITY OF LINO LAKES • 0 0 N no Q" O - !! al Fs a 2N Hi r2i pi! 111 III)3 0 N S1 1 0 b 2 0 (rim FS A rivGw ✓l L% Y i • 1 MN SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE CODE Orr COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 12 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2 845 STRAIGHT LEADER Aeer x freeman!! 'Jerrersred' CAL. AND FULL GROIN 5 10 - AUTUMN APPLAUSE WHITE ASH 2" 546 STRAIGHT LEADER Fraxlnus americana 'Autumn Applause' CAL. - AND FULL CROON C 10 BLACK ASH I 2" 546 STRAIGHT LEADER Fraxlnus nlgra CAL. AND FULL CROWN D 10 RED OAK 2" 545 STRAIGHT LEADER Qu4rew rubra CAL. AND FULL CROON E 10 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE LS" 646 MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Betula x 'Crimson Frost' CAL. AND FULL CROWN F 14 THORNLESS HAWTHORN 15" 54B MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Crateagus crusgall1 var. InermIs CAL. AND FULL CROWN G 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea qlauca 'Gamuts' HT 14 16 COLORADO SPRUCE 6' CANT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea puigens HT I 11' AUSTRIAN PINE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE PT, us nIgra NT QUANTIT ES SHOUW IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SNOIIN CN THE PLAN. OCT 2 8 2003 CITY OF r , x <; A . `: WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES. CABLES. CONDUITS. PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES. OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. 0 1 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET m c 0 O 0 R O Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services www.schoellmadson.com gragtemeetir Schoell & Madson, Inc. 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55305 -1525 Nov. 18, 2003 City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Marshan Lake Condominiums Stormwater Pond Calculations This letter is in response to the "incomplete" letter received from the city. Schoell and Madson, Inc. provided the city with a letter dated Oct 28, 2003. This letter indicated that the runoff from the proposed development would contribute to an existing pond just east of the site. Schoell and Madson Inc. reviewed the pond calculations for the existing pond and confirmed that the pond had been designed to include the above stated parcel at full development. Below is a recap of the original letter dated Oct 28, 2003 along with additional supporting evidence. General Project Description The proposed project consists of 46 attached residential units within a project area of 4.05 acres. The project area is located just east of Lake Drive and north of Aqua Lane. Refer to the attachment for the project location map. Stormwater Management Existing Conditions The site is flat with a maximum difference in elevation of only five feet. Currently, the site is used for agricultural purposes and several buildings occupy the site. The majority of the site drains to one of four catch basins located on Aqua Circle. The remainder of the site sheet drains to a swale on Lake Drive or Aqua Lane. The storm sewer on Aqua Circle discharges to a stormwater pond just east of the proposed project. Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Employer 10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 1 • Minneapolis, MN 55305 -1525 Office (952) 546 -7601 • Fax (952) 546 -9065 Proposed Conditions` This project proposes 46 attached residential units. When the development adjacent to the proposed project was built, the stormwater pond was sized to incorporate this project site, assuming full development. Schoell and Madson, Inc. received the stormwater calculations and a grading plan for the adjacent site. The total area contributing to the pond was verified to be 19.5 acres. Refer to Exhibit "D ". The CN used in the calculations was 85, which is consistent with townhomes with hydrologic group "B" soils. An exact impervious /pervious analysis also was prepared for the proposed site. Refer to Exhibit "A ". The pond volume stated in the report was also verified to be accurate. The dead volume was confirmed to be 1.93 acre -ft and the storage volume confirmed to be 5.0 acre -ft. This report, prepared by R. Nelson Engineering, is attached. Schoell and Madson, Inc. has also prepared a HydroCAD model of the site. Refer to Exhibit "B". If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please feel free to give me a call at 952- 847 -9622. Sincerely, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. JAAck Sara Garland CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 -year 10- year 100 -year Inflow 18.03 cfs 42.73 cfs 71.48 cfs Outflow 3.31 cfs 8.84 cfs 12.43 cfs Pealc Elevation 887.06' 888.03' 889.08' If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please feel free to give me a call at 952- 847 -9622. Sincerely, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. JAAck Sara Garland CITY OF LINO LAKES • Marshan Condos Project #: 63506 -004 Impervious Areas Calc. & CN - Proposed Conditions Total Site Buildings Drives Cont. to Pond Total Imperv. Pervious 5845.68 (SF) (SF) (SF) 329.49 141120.97 90197.99 50922.98 295.85 295.85 295.85 CN 295.85 98 Impervious 295.85 61 Pervious 295.85 85 IRCN* 15228.11 • 328.8 296.84 296.84 296.84 296.84 296.84 296.84 5858.9 295.85 295.85 295.85 295.85 295.85 295.85 13063.87 10895.78 332.56 295.38 295.38 295.38 295.38 4314.51 332.56 295.38 295.38 295.38 295.38 10895.05 10693.84 374.24 325.68 320.65 311.52 307.27 2745.2 50082.81 40115.18 «Subtotals 90197.99 «Total * This is consistent with R. Nelson Engineering's Report which used an RCN of 85. Eb'F A'1 Attachment IV 0 CO CO el 2 w CO CO Ca I0 = 0 O° G7 0 -.V Y J J C C L L L L c c C C '1911F W N O Marshan2_MLCCS • Attachment 9 Marshan2_MLCCS Cattail marsh Limnetic open water Lowland hardwood forest Native dominated temporarily flooded shrubland Other exposed /transitional land with 11 -25% impervious cover Palustrine open water Pavement with 91 -100% impervious cover Saturated non - native dominated graminoid vegetation Semipermanently flooded non - native dominated vegetation Short grasses and mixed trees with 26 -50% impervious cover Short grasses and mixed trees with 51 -75% impervious cover Short grasses on hydric soils Short grasses with 51 -75% impervious cover Parcels s MARSHAN TOWNHOMES 2ND ADDITION PLANNING INFORMATION Parking Requirements: Ordinance controls parking in the following ways: Requirements per Ordinance Proposed for Site • "Townhome, Quadraminium, Multiple • • Totals were figured based on the following calculations: 2.25 stalls X 46 units = 104 required stalls Actual stalls to be constructed is 184 Family: at least 2.25 rent -gree spaces per unit. In projects 8 units or more, the City may require additional clustered guest parking spaces based upon calculation of required demand." Pervious/Impervious Coverage: Ordinance controls impervious coverage in the R -4, High Density Residential District in the following way: Requirements per Ordinance Proposed for Site • Impervious is limited to 65 %, with pervious at 35% • Impervious at X %, with pervious at X% Lighting Requirements: Ordinance controls lighting in the following ways: Requirements per Ordinance Proposed for the Site • Light Intensity: is limited to 1.0 foot • A photometric lighting plan has not yet been submitted by the applicant. candles at street R.O.W., and 0.4 on any adjacent residential property • There is no information about light • Fixtures: "shall contain a cutoff which fixtures at this time. directs and cuts off the light at an angle of 90 degrees or less." • Pole Height: maximum height of the fixture and pole above the ground grade is 30 feet. Density Requirements: Requirements per Ordinance: Proposed for the Site • Zoning: the property is zoned R -4, • Density for the site is described as 11.36 units per acre High Density Residential, which notes density should be "within a range of 6- 12 units per acre based o the buildable area." (46 units /4.05 acres = 11.36) • Comprehensive Plan: the City's comp. Plan guides the property as medium density, which is defined as "3 - 6 units per acre." Agenda Item 6A Environmental Board Meeting Date: December 8, 2003 Topic: Goals Summary: Each year the Environmental Board develops a set of goals. Attached are the Environmental Board Goals for 2003. It seems like some of the 2003 goals are tied - together, and have slowed because of administrative issues (such as greenways program, and high priority land protection /acquisition). I will update you on these issues at the meeting. Attachments: 1. 2003 Environmental Board Goals Seek funding and agencies to. help with land acquisition for open space, wildlife habitats, greenway corridors, and to protect high ecological value areas:. . City of Lino Lakes Quarterly Newsletter Time Line 2003/2004 Working Days Quarter Months Covered Process Needed Deadlines Summer 2003 Fall 2003 June Article Prep. 9 April 1 - 11 July lst Draft 5 April 14 -18 August 2nd Draft 8 April 21-30 Final Revisions 7 May 1 -9 Printing and Mailing 10 May 12 -23 Last week of May (5) May 26 -30 September Article Prep. 9 July 1 -11 October 1 s` Draft 5 July 14 -18 November 2nd Draft 9 July 21 -31 Final Revisions 6 August 1 -8 Printing and Mailing 10 August 11 -22 Last week of Aug. (5) August 25 -29 Winter 2003 December Article Prep. 8 October 1 -10 January 1st Draft 5 October 13 -17 February 2nd Draft 10 October 20 -31 Final Revisions 5 November 3 -7 Printing and Mailing 10 November 10 -21 Last week of Nov. (5) November 24 -28 Spring 2004 March Article Prep. 7 January 1 -9 April 1st Draft 5 January 12 -16 May 2nd Draft 10 January 19 -30 Final Revisions 5 February 2 -6 Printing and Mailing 10 February 9 -20 Last week of February 5 February 23 -27 City Council Meeting (2nd & 4th Monday) January 12, 2004 January 26, 2004 February 9 February 23 00 .4 March 22 CNI Q N Q May 10 May 24 June 14 o0 N N July 12 July 26 August 9 August 23 September 13 September 27 October 11 October 25 November 8 November 22 December 13 December 28 January 10, 2005 January 24, 2005 February 14, 2005 City Council Work Session (Wednesday before Council mtg.) January 7, 2004 January 21, 2004 1 February 4 ir d J'ebruary 18 4- etsy 1 March 3 March 17 L tudd N ra May 5 - P-, June 9 N g Q ti July 7 July 21 August 4 August 18 September 8 September 22 October 6 October 20 November 3 November 17 December 8 December 22 January 5, 2005 January 19,2005 I February 9, 2005 Planning & Zoning Board (2nd Wednesday) December 10, 2003 January 14, 2004 February 11 March 10 a May 12 June 9 v .. August 11 September 8 October 13 November 10 December 8 January 12, 2005 Park Board (1st Monday) December 1, 2003 0 0 N N February 2 March 1 vl May 3 June 7 July 12 August 2 No Meeting October 4 November 1 December 6 January 3, 2005 Environmental Board (Last Wednesday) November 19, 2003 EDAC Dec. 4 December 17, 2003 EDAC Jan.8 January 28, 2004 EDAC Feb. 5 February 25 EDAC March. 4 March 31 EDAC April April 28 EDAC May 6 May 26 EDAC June 3 June 30 EDAC - No Mtg. July 28 EDAC Aug. 5 August 25 EDAC Sept. 2 September 29 EDAC Oct. 7 October 27 EDAC Nov. 4 November 17 EDAC Dec. 2 December 29 Application Deadline (Monday four weeks before P &Zmtg.) November 10, 2003 1 December 8, 2003 1 January 12, 2004 February 9 March 15 N .r a Q May 10 June 14 July 12 August 9 September 13 October 11 November 8 December 13