Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />The developer has submitted a new preliminary plat for your review. The <br />Preliminary Plat meets all of the City Requirements (inside growth area, MUSA <br />area, asking for no variances, meets zoning requirements, etc.) <br />Analysis: <br />This plan is a minimum acceptable plan in terms of greenway considerations. <br />The plan will work for a minimum consideration of a greenway with room for a <br />trail. However, environmentally we are trying do accomplish as much as we can <br />with buffering, and capturing unique resources. <br />A number of environmental issues could be improved in this proposal with the <br />use of a Conservation Development approach. The approach would involve <br />MNRAM (Minnesota Rapid Assessment Methodology) assessment of wetlands, <br />meeting with the TAP (Technical Advisory Panel) of the Bureau of Soil and <br />Water, and hopefully enabling some flexibility in moving some of the wetlands on <br />the East side of the property. Through this redesign, it is believed that we could <br />create more functional and valuable wetlands, maintain the desired spaces for <br />houses for the developer, while increasing the amount of green space available <br />for greenway. The developer has dropped the number of proposed lots to 56 on <br />this plan from 64 on the original plan. We might also be able to save more of the <br />tree areas using the Conservation Development approach, and be able to <br />incorporate some very functional surface -water treatment features such as rain <br />gardens. A stewardship program could be initiated through the establishment of <br />a trust -fund and association fees. The trust fund would ensure the care of <br />Conservation Areas in the development. The Homeowners Association would <br />own the Conservation easement. <br />The original concerns of the Environmental Board still hold. Since at this writing, <br />we do not have soil boring information, there is no way to discern whether <br />pond /infiltration areas are 3 feet above the seasonally high water table. Also, <br />there are no approvals from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The wetland <br />delineation was accepted by the watershed. In my opinion, there are some <br />questionable wetland areas that were omitted from the delineation. Plant <br />indicators in these areas include Spirea, Royal, and Sensitive fern. <br />Options: <br />1. Conditional recommendation of approval <br />2. Recommend Council not to approve. <br />