Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />from construction activities by silt fence. The developer should understand that <br />the City may ask for a more substantial tree protection fence in areas where <br />grading and construction approaches save areas. In addition to tree locations, <br />the map shows soil types, delineated wetlands, and flood plain areas. I have <br />supplemented this map with GIS Attachments 2, 3, 4, and 11. Trees for the most <br />part are smaller diameter Boxelder, and Siberian Elm typical of a previously <br />disturbed site. There are also select areas of Eastern red Cedar, Scotch Pine, <br />and White /Blue Spruce. <br />Significant Resources Considerations. <br />There are no documented National Registry plants or animals on this site. <br />Although not documented on the site, there are other areas of the City where we <br />have found rare plant communities that have the same ecologic signature as an <br />area on this site. See Attachment 11. Pinned areas on the map show areas on <br />the edge or in the flood plain on Iw soils where one expect these plants to exist. <br />This is one of the reasons the level one habitat /greenway area is shown dipping <br />into this parcel. One other site observation is the City Blandings Turtle Model <br />predicts Blandings Turtles breeding and activity areas to the North and East. <br />This site is an excellent place to start obtaining connectivity through the level one <br />habitat area to the designated Greenway area to the NE. A Conservation <br />Easement or Fee Title to flood Plain Wetlands on the North Side of this property <br />should be given. A rare plant survey should be required for this proposed <br />development area to substantiate any existing plants. <br />• It is unclear to me if the developer is showing the required 10 buffer around <br />wetland areas to the North. A wider buffer is preferable. <br />Type three wetlands proposed to be filled on the South side of the plan will have <br />to be mitigated on a two for one basis somewhere in the sub - watershed. I have <br />inquired with RCWD concerning their findings. All wetland mitigation area, pond <br />areas, and disturbed buffer areas of remaining wetlands must be seeded with the <br />City native seed mix. Signs along a requested Conservation Easement should <br />be placed on the boundary every 100 to 150 feet. All pond and infiltration, and <br />spillway areas must show a public access for maintenance needs. Forbays <br />should be incorporated into pond and spillway areas in order to keep sediment <br />out of existing wetland Native seed should be used at any spillway overflow <br />areas. There is a concern for the spillway over flow. The spillway is <br />questionably and empirically small and a good amount of surface water is flowing <br />to it. One might expect sedimentation to occur periodically into the wetland area. <br />We do not want this to occur. <br />The Pond area on the North and East sides are constructed into the flood plain <br />and possible rare plant feature area. The ponds /wetland replacement area <br />should be pulled out of this flood plain area and left undisturbed. The rare plant <br />communities commonly found in these areas are dependent on flood plain. It <br />