Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 6, 1999 <br />Dan was directed to contact Dennis Cheesebrow to determine if he would be available to <br />attend an all day goal setting meeting on Saturday, February 6, 1999 at Wargo Nature <br />Center. The same format used in 1998 will be used. <br />DISCUSSION OF MINUTES, KIM SULLIVAN <br />Kim clarified the process for discussion of items on the Consent Agenda. If a Council <br />Member wishes to discuss an item on the consent agenda, that item should be pulled from <br />the consent agenda at the time the agenda is set. Marilyn added if a Council Member <br />would like to reconsider a motion, it must be introduced by a Council Member who voted <br />for the motion and the reconsideration must take place on the same day the vote was <br />taken. <br />Kim noted the minutes policy was discussed at the last wor <br />was described as follows: 1) every set of minutes is to be <br />formally approved; 2) "DRAFT' minutes will only be <br />staff associated with the meeting covered by the "D <br />requested by anyone reviewing the minutes, thos <br />strike through/underline so they can be iden <br />minutes will be clearly labeled "APPRO <br />follow Robert's Rules of Order and includ <br />and the decision and action taken; 6) <br />approved within 30 days of the m <br />seconds a motion, and 8) a reco <br />utes policy <br />DRAFT' until <br />e members and <br />3) if revisions are <br />clearly marked with a <br />approval; 4) approved <br />minute format should closely <br />tement, summary of discussion, <br />official meeting minutes must be <br />uues the Chair to indicate who makes and <br />d tape must be kept for two (2) years. <br />It was noted that everyone 9 s minutes must be aware of the new policy. <br />Any corrections to cil minutes must be given to Marilyn by noon on <br />Friday before the Co i . eeting. If the minutes are still an issue they must be pulled <br />from the co v € s lyn will note any changes that are made. <br />DISCUSSION b = TS (INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS), <br />JOHN POWELL <br />John explained the City must follow the most restrictive ISTS ordinance. At this time, the <br />Anoka County ISTS is the most restrictive. Since ISTS rules have been changed, he has <br />requested and is awaiting receipt of the Anoka County ISTS. The City will have to <br />change their ISTS Ordinance. A new Ordinance will be developed within the next month <br />or so. <br />The City will communicate the ISTS changes and the new Ordinance to residents via the <br />City newsletter. Staff will also develop a reminder of the three (3) year inspection cycle <br />schedule to residents. <br />2 <br />