My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/23/1998 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1998
>
11/23/1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 1:29:09 PM
Creation date
8/26/2014 12:20:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
11/23/1998
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT -28 -1998 11 :2? <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 612 464 4568 P.04/05 <br />2. Blending the existing rear yards in Birchwood Acres into the grading of the new project, <br />drainage along the trail into the park, and who would pay for it. 1 indicated that a culvert would <br />be required to convey water from the north side of the trail to the wetland pond on the west side <br />of WSLD, and that we could also grade the rear of those yards in Birchwood Acres to improve <br />drainage if the City approved. RC indicated that he would pay for such grading, sod replacement, <br />and sprinkler system replacement if approved by the City. <br />3. Pond design, depth, safety issues, and covenants to prevent filling of the ponds. I indicated <br />that the ponds and wetlands will likely be about 4 feet deep with gradual sloping sides, and <br />wetland vegetation surrounding them. The covenants and stipulations in the easement around the <br />ponds will not allow cutting vegetation, or filling the ponds. These would be enforceable by Rice <br />Creek Watershed District, and also by the City if it is named on the easement that surrounds the <br />ponds. <br />4. Who is responsible for enforcing the covenants. RC indicated that he is responsible until <br />100% of the development is sold, then a committee can be formed by the property owners in the <br />development to enforce the covenants. <br />5. Would the barbed wire fence be removed, and could a more appropriate fence be installed <br />around or along side of the ponds, or to separate the park from the Birchwood Acres <br />development. RC indicated that he would remove the barbed wire fence, but he would not install <br />any fences, and that individual property owners could construct their own fences if they so chose. <br />RC also agreed to plant groupings of pines strategically located along the trail west of WSLD <br />(with park Board permission) to help isolate the trail. RC also indicated that he would plant some <br />trees for screening along the Rawleigh property east of WSLD. <br />Safety Issues on West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street -- the Dominant Issue <br />6. Safety issues on West Shadow Lake Drive related to connecting WSLD with 62nd Street. <br />These concerns stem from the idea that, with the connection, traffic from Birch Street may cut <br />through WSLD to 62nd Street to Ware Road to Ash Street to Highway 49 in order to avoid the <br />intersection at Birch Street and Highway 49. Fears that WSLD would be a 50 mph speedway <br />were expressed, and a general consensus was reached that stop signs may be warranted along <br />WSLD if the connection is made. (A better choice for drivers wanting to cut through to Ash <br />Street would be to take Ware Road -- a straight shot.) <br />7. Safety issues related to the width of 62nd Street, and the increased traffic on 62nd Street with <br />the connection to WSLD, and general speeding in that area. Residents indicated that the narrow <br />street width, combined with excessive speed, make 62nd Street dangerous even now. Increased <br />traffic would increase the danger. Joe Barthel, 6272 Red Maple Lane, indicated that school buses <br />race around Red Maple Lane, getting up to 50 mph between stops. Others indicated that higher <br />speeds are regularly observed on 62nd Street, making it especially dangerous for pedestrians. <br />One person remarked that, You don't want to be walking along 62nd when two vehicles are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.