Laserfiche WebLink
166 <br />Council Meeting <br />March 22, 1982 <br />The Clerk asked what should be the direction of the advertisement - what will the <br />major items to be discussed; <br />Mayor Benson said it would be to assist in the development of a Zoning Map and <br />Zoning Ordinance in order to implement the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mayor Benson asked Mr. McLean to take this information back to the Planning and <br />Zoning. <br />Mrs. Elsenpeter amended her motion to request that all persons submitting their names <br />for appointment to this task force, include their name, address, telephone number and <br />whether the person is resident, business person or a developer. This response to be <br />in writing. Mr. Kulaszewicz seconded. The Amendment carried unanimously. The original <br />motion carried unanimously. <br />ATTORNEY's REPORT <br />Mr. Hawkins reported on the Council's request for his review of the Charter specifically <br />in the area of Initiative and Referendum portion. Mr. Hawkins reported that Section 5.01 <br />is worded giving the people more powers than the State law allows. <br />Mr. Hawkins felt, that even though there is no severability provision in the Charter, <br />the fact that this section is invalid, it does not invalidate the entire Charter. His <br />recommendation to the Council is they make a recommendation to the Charter Commission <br />that they review that section and revise it to have it comply to the Minnesota Statutes <br />by eliminating the provision that deal with Resolutions and measures being subjected to <br />referendums. <br />Mayor Benson asked if there were any questions and Mr. Weible questioned the wording <br />'measures' - he did not feel this was in the Charter. Mr. Hawkins read it to him <br />from the Charter. Mr. Hawkins went on to discuss the difference between an ordinance <br />and a Resolution and to repeat that this language is too broad. <br />Mr. Hawkins suggested this matter and several other small items that need to be changed <br />be done by mutual agreement, and the changes be adopted by Ordinances. <br />Mr. Schumacher suggested that there be a joint meeting with the Council and the Charter <br />Commission be held once the codification is completed, and go through this together. <br />Public Improvement Financing Policy - Mr. Hawkins discussed this policy with the <br />Council and for the information of the public. This sets forth the manner in which <br />bonding will be provided for developers and the methods of repayment. There are also <br />provisions for the securing of payments. <br />It was suggested this matter be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for review <br />and to consider input from the Task Force. Mayor Benson felt that there should be a <br />full Council for consideration of this policy. <br />Mrs. Elsenpeter felt that at the last Council meeting, Mr. Hawkins had been instructed <br />to formulate this material for adoption before the bids are let on the Lakes Add. #7 <br />project. The general consensus of the Council was that that project could be either <br />approved or disapproved regardless of the action taken on this policy. <br />Mr. Schumacher asked for some direction as to what is to be expected of the developer III <br />on the Lakes Add. #7 project - his understanding was the project had been delayed in <br />order for the Attorney to put these documents together and have ready for adoption at <br />this meeting in order for the bids to be considered at the next meeting. <br />