My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/10/1986 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1986
>
02/10/1986 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2014 12:40:18 PM
Creation date
10/14/2014 11:21:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/10/1986
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
274 <br />Contractor <br />C. W. Houle, Inc. <br />Richard Knutson, Inc. <br />Austin P. Keller Construction <br />Arcon Construction Company <br />Winona Plumbing Company' <br />Barbarossa & Sons <br />Minn -Kota Excavating <br />Kenko, Inc. <br />L & G Rehbein, Inc. <br />Northdale Construction <br />Lametti & Sons <br />Progressive Contractors <br />COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 10, 1986 <br />Page Five <br />Bid <br />$ 911,944.50 <br />$ 973,619.55 <br />$1,075,364.50 <br />$1,075,652.51 <br />$1,077,638.20 <br />$1,090,796.40 <br />$1,095,095.90 <br />$1,149,297.30 <br />$1,152,163.70 <br />$1,199,883.25 <br />$1,213,000.00 <br />$1,261,307.55 <br />The engineer's estimate for the project was $1,074,637.00 and <br />the engineer recommended awarding to the low bidder, C. W. Houle, <br />Inc. Mr. Toddie stated that he had worked with this contractor <br />in the past and he rated the contractor as reliable and competent <br />stating that past experience has shown quality work and schedule <br />adherence. Mr. Volk, when asked, stated that he had experienced <br />no problems with C. W. Houle. <br />MOTION: Mr. Marier moved to award the bid to C. W. Houle for <br />$911,944.50. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. <br />When asked if there would be any foreseen schedule adherence <br />problems, Mr. Toddie stated that the bids were submitted with <br />an understanding of the planned schedule and that he anticipated <br />the schedule would be met, particularly in view of the fact that <br />a $600 per day penalty would be charged if not met. Mr. Toddie <br />felt that even though the awarding of the bid was slightly behind <br />schedule, the contractor would still be able to begin construction <br />according to the schedule. <br />On the vote, motion carried unanimously. <br />RESOLUTION #03 -86 <br />A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOW BID AND AUTHORIZING THE <br />IMPROVEMENT OF RICE LAKE ESTATES <br />WHEREAS, <br />WHEREAS, <br />pursuant to the advertisement for bids for the <br />improvement of Rice Lake Estates from North Road West <br />of the City limits to Lake Drive, South on Highway <br />#49 to Rice Lake Estates, bids were received, opened <br />and tabulated according to law, and <br />it appears that � . �,� of <br />7. <br />, <br />is the lowest responsible Bidder. <br />LLL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.